TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Hayes Williams v. Treen, 671 F.2d 892 (5th Cir. 1982)

84 citing cases

  1. 684 F.2d 1159 Fifth CircuitSeptember 7, 1982

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 897 (5th Cir. 1982); Barker v. Norman, 651 F.2d 1107, 1120 (5th Cir. 1981).

  2. 690 F.2d 827 Eleventh CircuitNovember 1, 1982

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 896 (5th Cir. 1982). Aside from affirmatively asserting the defense, defendants must prove that their acts fall within the scope of discretionary authority. This involves a question of fact. Id. at 897 .

  3. 546 F. Supp. 726 D. OregonAugust 31, 1982

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 896 (5th Cir. 1982); Gullatte v. Potts, supra, 654 F.2d at 1012-14 ; Harris v. City of Roseburg, supra, 664 F.2d at 1127-28; Lock v. Jenkins, 641 F.2d 488, 499-500 (7th Cir. 1981). See also Wood v.

  4. 840 F.2d 1194 Fifth CircuitMarch 15, 1988

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 895 (5th Cir.1982), and its rationale was expressly adopted in Ryals , albeit before the Supreme Court’s action. Finally, Ryals was followed in Henry v.

  5. Jensen v. Conrad
    570 F. Supp. 114 D. South CarolinaAugust 24, 1983

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892 (5th Cir.1982). 6 After thorough analysis of the policy objectives which prompted recognition of the good faith immunity defense, the Fifth Circuit ruled that state officials who violate clearly established state law are not entitled to

  6. E.D. TexasNovember 7, 2025

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 900 (5th Cir. 1982); Cuvillier v. Taylor, 503 F.3d 397 , 402–03 (5th Cir. 2007).

  7. Davis v. Scherer
    468 U.S. 183 Supreme CourtAugust 16, 1984

    Treen, 671 F. 2d 892 (CA5 1982), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 1126 (1983), that had held that official conduct in violation of an explicit and clearly established state regulation was per se unreasonable. 671 F. 2d, at 899 .

  8. 679 F.2d 1115 Fifth CircuitJune 23, 1982

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892 , 900 n.16 (5th Cir. 1982). 82 . 452 U.S. at 343-345 , 101 S.Ct. at 2397-98, 69 L.Ed.2d at 66-67 . 83 . Id. at 345 , 101 S.Ct. at 2398, 69 L.Ed.2d at 67 (quoting Gregg v.

  9. 729 F.2d 362 Fifth CircuitApril 13, 1984

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892 , 896 n. 6 (5th Cir.1982). In any event, the magistrate clearly made none of the findings necessary to determine whether these defendants are entitled to good faith immunity. See id. at 896-97 .

  10. 927 F.2d 844 Fifth CircuitApril 2, 1991

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892 , 900 n. 15 (1982). In this setting, where the inmate was not in imminent danger, this Court has interpreted the causation element to require a showing that the infliction of harsh conditions was “unnecessary and wanton.”

  11. 542 F. Supp. 1331 N.D. New YorkJuly 9, 1982

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 899-900 (5th Cir. 1982). [16] Harlow v.

  12. 714 F.2d 1372 Fifth CircuitSeptember 22, 1983

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892 , 900 n. 15 (5th Cir.1982) (“Of course, while the defendant officials are not entitled to an immunity, we do not mean to suggest that upon remand, the defendants must be found liable. In this case, there is a host of defendants ....

  13. 174 F.3d 530 Fifth CircuitMay 14, 1999

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 901 (5th Cir. 1982) (“mere negligence in giving or failing to supply medical treatment would not support an action under Section 1983”(emphasis added)); see also Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d 1235, 1246 (5th Cir. 1989).

  14. Malek v. Haun
    26 F.3d 1013 Tenth CircuitJune 10, 1994

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 900 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1126 , 103 S.Ct. 762 , 74 L.Ed.2d 977 (1983).

  15. 254 F.3d 545 Fifth CircuitJune 15, 2001

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 901 (5th Cir.1982). Disagreement with medical treatment alone cannot support a claim under § 1983. See Norton v. Dimazana, 122 F.3d 286, 292 (5th Cir.1997).

  16. 750 F.2d 405 Fifth CircuitJanuary 14, 1985

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 895 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1126 , 103 S.Ct. 762 , 74 L.Ed.2d 977 (1983).

  17. 20 F.3d 187 Fifth CircuitMay 10, 1994

    F.2d 892 (5th Cir.1982). 5 .

  18. 699 F.2d 744 Fifth CircuitMarch 7, 1983

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 900, 901 (5th Cir.1982) (a state official who knowingly deprives a prisoner of vital medical treatment violates constitutionally protected rights). See also Estelle v.

  19. 754 F.2d 1311 Fifth CircuitMarch 15, 1985

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 896 (5th Cir.1982); Jackson v. State of Mississippi, 644 F.2d 1142, 1145 (5th Cir.1981).

  20. 221 Cal. App. 3d 1072 California Court of AppealJune 28, 1990

    Treen (5th Cir. 1982) 671 F.2d 892, 900 .) “California state courts should apply federal law to determine whether a complaint pleads a cause of action under section 1983 sufficient to survive a general demurrer.” (Greene v.

  21. 701 F.2d 909 Eleventh CircuitApril 1, 1983

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 896 (5th Cir.1982). Here, Duggan injected this issue into the lawsuit by making it the basis for his motion for summary judgment and accompanying memorandum of law. 14 .

  22. 138 F.3d 767 Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 1998

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 900 (5th Cir.1982). Picray relies on the Hewitt v. Helms line of cases, which hold that “a State creates a protected liberty interest by placing substantive limitations on official discretion.” Kentucky v.

  23. Beard v. Baum
    796 P.2d 1344 Alaska Supreme CourtAugust 3, 1990

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 900 (5th Cir. 1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1126 , 103 S.Ct. 762 , 74 L.Ed.2d 977 (1983). Beard also alleged that the state and the individual appellees in their official capacities violated section 1983 on the same ground.

  24. 572 F. Supp. 1401 N.D. GeorgiaSeptember 13, 1983

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 900 (5th Cir.1982); Chavis v. Rowe, 643 F.2d 1281, 1289 (7th Cir.1981); Williams v. Board of Regents, 629 F.2d 993 , 1000 n. 11 (5th Cir.1980).

  25. 693 F.2d 566 Fifth CircuitDecember 14, 1982

    Treen, 671 F.2d 892, 896 (5th Cir.1982) (U.S.app.pndg.); Jackson v. Mississippi, 644 F.2d 1142, 1145 (5th Cir.1981).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list