TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S.W. 36 (Tex. App. 1914)

25 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Steele v. St. Joseph's Hospital
    60 S.W.2d 1083 Court of Appeals of TexasApril 29, 1933

    E. 649 ; St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App. Dallas) 164 S. W. 36 ; Nicholas v. Hospital, 281 Mo. 182 , 219 S. W. 643 ; Roberts v. Kirksville College of Osteopathy & Surgery (Mo. App.) 16 S.W.(2d) 625 . The case of St. Paul’s Sanitarium v.

  2. Baylor University v. Boyd
    18 S.W.2d 700 Court of Appeals of TexasMay 15, 1929

    St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36 ; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 588 ; Koenig et ux. v. Baylor Hospital et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 396 .

  3. Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium
    229 S.W. 588 Court of Appeals of TexasMarch 23, 1921

    We will not burden this opinion with the citation of authorities of foreign jurisdictions, but call attention to these Texas eases: St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S. W. 36 ; Scott v. All Saints’ Hospital, 203 S. W. 146 ; Ry. Co. v.

  4. Enell v. Baptist Hospital
    45 S.W.2d 395 Court of Appeals of TexasDecember 10, 1931

    Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36, 39 , writ of error denied by the Supreme Court. See, also, 6 Cyc. 975.

  5. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. Hughes
    130 F.2d 810 D.C. CircuitJune 30, 1942

    St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App.1914, 164 S.W. 36 (paying patient allowed to recover for selection of an inexperienced nurse to perform a particular task). Virginia: Hospital of St. Vincent of Paul v.

  6. Roosen v. Peter Bent Brigham Hospital
    235 Mass. 66 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtFebruary 26, 1920

    St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S. W. Rep. 36 . This view at first sight is apparently supported by Illinois Central Railway v.

  7. Tucker v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'n
    68 So. 4 Supreme Court of AlabamaFebruary 11, 1915

    Paul's Sanatorium v: Williamson, (Tex. Civ. App.), 164 S. W. 36 , the rule is stated to be in that state, as to the question directly here at issue, in accord with contention of the appellee.

  8. Morrison v. Henke
    160 N.W. 173 Wisconsin Supreme CourtMarch 13, 1917

    Warner, 75 Wash. 470 , 135 Pac. 235 ; St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36 ; Perry v. House of Refuge, 63 Md. 20 ; 2 Cooley, Torts (3d ed.) 1011-1013; 1 Jaggard, Torts, 184; 2 Dillon, Mun.

  9. Southern Methodist University v. Clayton
    176 S.W.2d 749 Texas Supreme CourtDecember 15, 1943

    See St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36 (er. ref.); Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium (Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 588 (er. dism.); Baylor University v. Boyd (Civ. App.) 18 S. W. (2d) 700 ; Enell et al v. Baptist Hospital (Civ. App.) 45 S.

  10. Watkins v. Southcrest Baptist Church
    399 S.W.2d 530 Texas Supreme CourtJanuary 5, 1966

    See St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ. App., 164 S.W. 36 , error refused; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, Tex. Civ.App., 229 S.W. 588 , error dismissed; Baylor University v. Boyd, Tex.Civ.App., 18 S.W.2d 700 ; Enell et al. v.

  11. Medical & Surgical Memorial Hospital v. Cauthorn
    229 S.W.2d 932 Court of Appeals of TexasDecember 31, 1949

    Clayton, supra, and St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 36 , e. r.

  12. Sessions v. Thomas D. Dee Memorial Hospital Ass'n.
    78 P.2d 645 Utah Supreme CourtApril 25, 1938 Dissent

    W. 775 ; Texas: St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex. Civ. App., 164 S. W. 36 ; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, Tex. Civ. App., 229 S. W. 588 ; Baylor University v. Boyd, Tex. Civ. App., 18 S. W. 2d 700 ; Steele v. St.

  13. Williams ex rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.
    75 S.E.2d 303 Supreme Court of North CarolinaMarch 25, 1953

    Columbia Hospital, 98 S.C. 25 , 81 S.E. 512 ; St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 36 ; Weston's Adm'x v. Hospital of St. Vincent, 131 Va. 587 , 107 S.E. 785 , 23 A.L.R. 907 ; Wharton v. Warner, 75 Wash. 470 , 135 P. 235 ; Roberts v.

  14. Texas Harvester Co. v. Wilson-Whaley Co.
    210 S.W. 574 Court of Appeals of TexasJune 22, 1918

    Heard, 164 S. W. 36 . [2] In support of the contention that J. B.

  15. Hotel Dieu v. Armendariz
    167 S.W. 181 Court of Appeals of TexasMay 14, 1914

    See, also, St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S. W. 36 , by the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals, which is practically to the same effect.

  16. City of San Antonio v. Santa Rosa Infirmary
    249 S.W. 498 Court of Appeals of TexasJanuary 24, 1923

    Appellee also cites St. Paul's Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S.W. 36 , decided by the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fifth District.

  17. Penaloza v. Baptist Memorial Hospital
    304 S.W.2d 203 Court of Appeals of TexasJune 14, 1957

    St Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 36 (Writ Ref.); Enell v. Baptist Hospital, Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W.2d 395 (Writ Ref.); Steele v. St. Joseph’s Plospital, Tex.Civ.App., 60 S.W.2d 1083 (Writ Ref.); Southern Methodist University v.

  18. City of McAllen v. Gartman
    81 S.W.2d 147 Court of Appeals of TexasFebruary 13, 1935

    W. 588, 590 ; St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36 ; Baylor University v. Boyd (Tex. Civ. App.) 18 S.W.(2d) 700, 701 ; *149 Koenig v. Baylor Hospital (Tex. Civ. App.) 10 S.W.(2d) 396 ; Enell v. Baptist Hospital (Tex. Civ.

  19. Koenig v. Baylor Hospital
    10 S.W.2d 396 Court of Appeals of TexasOctober 25, 1928

    S.) 1206; St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36 ; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 588 .

  20. Ewing v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.
    239 S.W. 251 Court of Appeals of TexasFebruary 25, 1922

    As upholding this position, the main cases presented are: St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson (Tex. Civ. App.) 164 S. W. 36 ; Armendarez v. Hotel Dieu (Tex. Civ. App.) 145 S. W. 1030 , 164 Ky. 810 , 176 S. W. 181 , and (Tex. Com. App.) 210 S.

  21. Yost v. Texas Christian University
    362 S.W.2d 338 Court of Appeals of TexasNovember 16, 1962

    See St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 36 ; error refused; Barnes v. Providence Sanitarium, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W. 588 , error dismissed; Baylor University v. Boyd, Tex.Civ.App., 18 S.W.2d 700 ; Enell et al. v.

  22. Davis v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.
    196 S.W. 603 Court of Appeals of TexasApril 9, 1917

    W. 1030 , and St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S. W. 36 , to support his allegations of liability of the hospital association.

  23. Clayton v. Southern Methodist University
    172 S.W.2d 197 Court of Appeals of TexasMay 7, 1943

    St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 36 , writ refused; Armendarez v. Hotel Dieu, Tex.Civ.App., 145 S.W. 1030 ; Hotel Dieu v. Armendarez, Tex.Civ.App., 167 S.W. 181 ; affirmed in Tex.Com.App., 210 S.W. 518 ; 8 Tex.

  24. Killen v. Brazosport Memorial Hospital
    364 S.W.2d 411 Court of Appeals of TexasJanuary 10, 1963

    Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W. 36 , writ den.; Medical and Surgical Memorial Hospital v. Cauthorn, Tex.Civ.App., 229 S.W.2d 932 , err. ref., n. r. e.; Clayton v.

  25. George v. City of Houston
    465 S.W.2d 387 Court of Appeals of TexasFebruary 25, 1971

    .); St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Williamson, 164 S.W. 36 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1914, error ref.); Medical & Surgical Memorial Hospital v. Cauthorn, 229 S.W.2d 932 (Tex.Civ.App.-El Paso 1949 error ref., n. r. e.); Felan v. Lucey, 259 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.Civ.App.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list