TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 39 P. 95 (Wash. 1895)

30 citing cases

  1. 51 P. 402 Washington Supreme CourtDecember 21, 1897 Dissent

    "Wash. 648).

  2. 107 P. 869 Washington Supreme CourtMarch 25, 1910

    Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 , this court said: “This hospital was maintained and the physician provided for the sole purpose of relieving sick and injured employees without expense to them and without any intention on the part of the company

  3. 169 P. 828 Washington Supreme CourtJanuary 11, 1918

    Warner was held liable, but, upon the authority of Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co. and Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co., supra, the corporation was discharged.

  4. 450 F. Supp. 2d 1186 E.D. WashingtonApril 24, 2006

    Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648, 655-56 , 39 P. 95 (1895).

  5. 345 P.3d 811 Court of Appeals of WashingtonFebruary 3, 2015

    E.g., Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648, 655-56 , 39 P. 95 (1895). ¶26 The Supreme Court has twice cited Matsuda as recognizing liability for negligent hiring or retention. First, in Estes v.

  6. Court of Appeals of WashingtonFebruary 3, 2015

    E.g., Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 655 -56, 39 P. 95 ( 1895). The Supreme Court has twice cited Matsuda as recognizing liability for negligent hiring or retention. First, in Estes v.

  7. Malloy v. Fong
    232 P.2d 241 California Supreme CourtJune 1, 1951

    Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648, 655 [ 39 P. 95 ]; Tribble v.

  8. 260 P.2d 765 Washington Supreme CourtSeptember 1, 1953

    Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 ; Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co., 57 Wash. 658 , 107 Pac. 869 ; Wharton v. Warner, 75 Wash. 470 , 135 Pac. 235 ; Simon v. Hamilton Logging Co., 76 Wash. 370 , 136 Pac. 361 ; Bise v. St.

  9. 155 P. 153 Washington Supreme CourtFebruary 17, 1916

    Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 ; Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co., 57 Wash. 658 , 107 Pac. 869 , 29 L. R. A. (N. S.) 426; Wharton v. Warner, 75 Wash. 470 , 135 Pac. 235 ; Simon v.

  10. 135 P. 235 Washington Supreme CourtSeptember 20, 1913

    Ferry, supra; Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 .

  11. 70 P. 972 Washington Supreme CourtDecember 6, 1902

    The second ground is that the evidence is insufficient to make a case for the jury, under the rule of Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 ( 39 Pac. 95 ).

  12. 78 P.2d 645 Utah Supreme CourtApril 25, 1938 Dissent

    E. 363 ; Washington: Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 P. 95 ; Wharton v. Warner, 75 Wash. 470 , 135 P. 235 ; Bise v. St. Luke’s Hospital, 181 Wash. 269 , 43 P. 2d 4 ; West Virginia: Roberts v.

  13. 164 P. 943 Washington Supreme CourtMay 8, 1917

    Law (2d ed.), 802; 5 Thompson, Negligence, § 6717; Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 .

  14. 43 P.2d 4 Washington Supreme CourtMarch 28, 1935

    S.) 426; Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 .

  15. Miller v. Mohr
    89 P.2d 807 Washington Supreme CourtApril 21, 1939

    This instruction was in accord with the following decisions of this court: Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 ; Wharton v. Warner, 75 Wash. 470 , 135 Pac. 235 ; Magnuson v.

  16. 242 P. 372 Washington Supreme CourtJanuary 12, 1926

    Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 , it was said: “We there held that the corporation was a charitable institution so far as the hospital feature was concerned, and, even though the company did employ the physician to care for and treat the sick

  17. 72 P. 477 Washington Supreme CourtApril 29, 1903

    Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 ( 39 Pac. 95 ); Thompson, Trials, § 2415; Jones, Evidence, § 898; Anson v. Evans, 19 Colo. 274 ( 35 Pac. 47 ); McDermott v Hannibal & St. J. Ry. Co., 87 Mo. 285 .

  18. 151 P. 780 Washington Supreme CourtSeptember 24, 1915

    Law (2d ed.), 802; 5 Thompson, Negligence, §6717; Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 .

  19. 221 P. 979 Washington Supreme CourtJanuary 7, 1924

    Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 , wherein Judge Anders, considering a claim of liability against the coal company in maintaining a hospital for its employees, observed: “This hospital was maintained and the physician provided for the sole purpose

  20. 236 P. 1069 Montana Supreme CourtMay 18, 1925

    W. 69 ; Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal. Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 .)

  21. 79 S.E. 941 West Virginia Supreme CourtSeptember 30, 1913

    Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 ; and Quinn v. Kansas City &c. Co., 94 Tenn. 713 , 28 L. R. A. 552. To the same effect as above is Neil v. Flynn Lumber Co., supra.

  22. 303 F.2d 76 Ninth CircuitMay 15, 1962

    See, e. g., Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 P. 95 (1895), Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co., 57 Wash. 658 , 107 P. 869 , 29 L.R.A..N.S., 426 (1910), Simon v. Hamilton Logging Co., 76 Wash. 370 , 136 P. 361 (1913), and Engirbritson v.

  23. 113 P. 562 Washington Supreme CourtFebruary 10, 1911

    Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648, 651 , 39 Pac. 95 , this court said: “Where a complaint sets forth two causes of action, which may properly be joined, without separately stating them as required by the code, the proper remedy is a motion to require plaintiff

  24. 132 S.W. 112 Court of Appeals of TexasJune 26, 1909 Dissent

    Rep. 313 ; Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co., 10 Wash. 648 , 39 Pac. 95 ; 26 Cyc. 1082, and cases cited; also cases cited in 34 Cent. Dig. cols. 611, 612, 613.

  25. 85 P. 502 Oregon Supreme CourtMay 22, 1906

    Zeiler, 54 Kan. 340 ( 38 Pac. 282 ); Richardson v. Carbon Hill Coal Co. 10 Wash. 648 ( 39 Pac. 95 ).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list