TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Bute v. Potts, 18 P. 329 (Cal. 1888)

8 citing cases

  1. 235 N.W.2d 187 Supreme Court of MinnesotaSeptember 26, 1975

    S. 601 (1927); Bute v. Potts, 76 Cal. 304 , 18 P. 329 (1888); Brown v. Shyne, 242 N. Y. 176 , 151 N. E. 197 (1926). Cf. In re Tug Management Corp. 330 F. Supp. 486 *426 (E. D. Pa. 1971). But see, Whipple v. Grandchamp, 261 Mass. 40 , 158 N.

  2. 497 P.2d 1354 Hawaii Supreme CourtJune 2, 1972

    App.2d 85, 93-94 , 338 P.2d 607, 611-12 (1959); Bute v. Potts, 76 Cal. 304, 305 , 18 P. 329 (1888). In the present case, Dr.

  3. 105 N.E. 178 Indiana Court of AppealsMay 15, 1914

    Potts (1888), 76 Cal. 304 , 18 Pac. 329 ; Holtzman v. Hoy (1886), 118 Ill. 534 , 8 N. E. 832 , 59 Am. Rep. 390 . 12. 20. We have examined the questions presented in relation to the evidence and instructions given and refused and find no reversible error.

  4. 338 P.2d 607 California Court of AppealMay 1, 1959

    Potts (1888), 76 Cal. 304 [ 18 P. 329 ], There the defendant physician was unlicensed and the court declared: “The fact that he had or had not certificates and diplomas as a physician and surgeon is no proof either that he had skill as such or lacked it.

  5. 8 So. 2d 37 Supreme Court of FloridaMay 8, 1942

    Bute v. *Page 541 Potts, 76 Cal. 304 , 18 P. 329 ; Holtzman v. Hay, 118 Ill. 534 , 8 N.E. 832 , 59 Am. ap. 390." Spearman Redfield on the law of Negligence, Vol. 3 (6th Ed.) pages 1629-30, par. 614A, say: ". . .

  6. 197 S.W.2d 798 Tennessee Supreme CourtNovember 30, 1946

    In Bute v. Potts, 76 Cal. 304 , 18 P. 329 , the Court said: “. . . A certificate or diploma could be no proof that he (defendant) acted with skill in attending a given patient, or that he did not so act.

  7. 37 L.R.A. 830 Supreme Court of IowaApril 10, 1897 Dissent

    Bute v. Potts, 76 Cal. 304 . The fact thata doctor is reputed to be negligent and uuskilful cannot be allowed as proof to establish negligence or unskilful treatment in a particular case, Stevenson v. Gelsthorpe, 10 Mont. 563 . X. Who judges of shill.

  8. Hardy v. Dahl
    187 S.E. 788 Supreme Court of North CarolinaOctober 14, 1936

    Bute v. Potts, 76 Cal., 304 ; Janssen v. Mulder, 232 Mich., 183 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list