TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Sauter v. N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R., 66 N.Y. 50 (1876)

12 citing cases

  1. 53 N.E. 435 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtApril 17, 1899

    Sauter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 66 N. Y. 50 . McDonald v. Chicago & Northwestern Railroad, 26 Iowa, 124, 140 . Central Railroad v. Richards, 62 Ga. 306 . Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Allison, 86 Ga. 145 .

  2. 118 U.S. 545 Supreme CourtNovember 1, 1886

    R. 8 Ex. 221; Sauter v. New York Central Railroad, 66 N. Y. 50 ; McDonald v. Chicago & Northwestern Railroad, 26 Iowa, 124, 140 ; Central Railroad v. Richards, 62 Georgia, 306.

  3. 123 Ala. 233 Supreme Court of AlabamaNovember 15, 1898

    Y. 200 ; Sauter, Admr. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co., 66 N. Y. 50 ; Tiffany Death by Wrongful Act, § 76; 1 Sher. & Red. on Negligence, §§26 et seq; Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Jones, 83 Ala. 376 . Reversed and remanded.

  4. 83 N.E. 184 Illinois Supreme CourtDecember 17, 1907

    City of Janesville, 68 Wis. 50 ; Sauter v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co. 66 N. Y. 50 ; Vicksburg and Meridian Railroad Co. v. Putnam, 118 U. S. 545 .) Mr.

  5. 267 F.2d 135 Second CircuitMay 22, 1959

    R., 1876, 66 N.Y. 50 ; Thompson v. Fox, 1937, 326 Pa. 209 , 192 A. 107 , 112 A.L.R. 550 ; Selleck v. City of Janesville, 1898, 100 Wis. 157 , 75 N.W. 975 , 41 L.R.A. 563 .

  6. 121 N.E. 413 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtDecember 30, 1918

    Sauter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 66 N. Y. 50 . Variety Manuf. Co. v. Landaker, 227 Ill. 22 . Reed v. Detroit, 108 Mich. 224 . Seeton v. Dunbarton, 73 N. H. 134. Lyons v. Erie Railway, 57 N. Y. 489 . Goss v. Goss, 102, Minn. 346.

  7. 104 So. 653 Supreme Court of AlabamaApril 9, 1925

    Sauter v. New York Central, 66 N. Y. 50 , 23 Am. Rep. 18 ; Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Bluhm, 109 Ill. 20 , 50 Am. Rep. 601 ; Pyke v. Jamestown, 15 N. D. 157 , 107 N. W. 359 ; Stover v. Inhabitants of Bluehill, 51 Me. 439 ; Loeser v.

  8. 55 S.E.2d 88 West Virginia Supreme CourtMarch 8, 1949

    (N.S.) 116; Sauter v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., 66 N.Y. 50 , 23 Am. Rep. 18 ; Paine v. Wyatt, 217 Ia. 1147 , 251 N.W. 78 ; Lane v. Southern Railway Company, 192 N.C. 287 , 134 S.E. 855 , 51 A.L.R. 1114 ; Keown v.

  9. 39 Mo. App. 233 Missouri Court of AppealsApril 13, 1889

    Railroad, 66 N. Y. 50 ; Railroad v. Buck, 96 Ind. 351 -2. At the argument of this cause before us, defendant’s counsel criticised plaintiff ’ s instruction number 4, and, as we think, unjustly.

  10. Banks v. Braman
    80 N.E. 799 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtApril 1, 1907

    Sauter v. New York Central & Budson River Railroad, 66 N. Y. 50 .

  11. 105 F. Supp. 9 S.D. New YorkJune 9, 1952

    See Restatement of Torts, Sections 457 — 459; Sauter v. New York Central and Hudson R. R. Co., 66 N.Y. 50 ; Jensen v. United States, supra, footnote 6 hereof. . Mayo v. United States of America War Shipping Administration, D.C., 82 F. Supp. 61 ; Christo v.

  12. Lewis v. State
    112 Misc. 667 New York State Court of ClaimsJuly 15, 1920

    Sauter v. New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co., 66 N. Y. 50 ; Austin v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 108 App. Div. 252 ; Schell v. Plumb, 55 N. Y. 592 ; Beecher v. Long Island R. Co., 53 App. Div. 324 ; Farley v. Union Mutual Life Ins. Co., 41 Hun, 305 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list