Citing references
Opinions citing Polovy v. Duncan, 269 A.D.2d 111 (2000)
6 citing cases
-
75 A.D.3d 479 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkJuly 20, 2010
A lawyer’s representation of a business entity does not render the law firm counsel to an individual partner, officer, *481 director or shareholder unless the law firm assumed an affirmative duty to represent that individual (see Polovy v Duncan, 269 AD2d 111,
-
85 A.D.3d 1406 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkJune 16, 2011
v Duncan, 269 AD2d 111, 112 [2000]; cf.
-
294 A.D.2d 114 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkMay 2, 2002
Baer, Cullen and Dykman, and Irwin Silbowitz since none of these defendants represented appellant in the prior litigation (see, Polovy v Duncan, 269 AD2d 111, 112 ).
-
109 A.D.3d 747 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkSeptember 26, 2013
Contrary to plaintiffs contentions, nothing in the parties’ actions created an attorney-client relationship (see Polovy v Duncan, 269 AD2d 111, 112 [1st Dept 2000]).
-
27 A.D.3d 231 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkMarch 7, 2006
Polovy v Duncan, 269 AD2d 111 [2000]).
-
288 A.D.2d 10 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New YorkNovember 1, 2001
In light of the prior history of disputes and litigation between Senich and the cooperative, she could not reasonably have believed that the cooperative’s attorneys were representing her, in the absence of express agreement to that effect (see, Polovy v Duncan,