Citing references
Opinions citing Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 (1872)
15 citing cases
-
110 S.E. 560 West Virginia Supreme CourtFebruary 7, 1922
That holding conforms to the principle enunciated in Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 ; Wilmot v. Howard, 39 Vt. 447 , already referred to.
-
79 N.E. 797 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJanuary 2, 1907
In Hibbard v.
-
11 N.W. 392 Michigan Supreme CourtJanuary 25, 1882
Hibbard v. Thompson 109 Mass. 286 ; Geiselman v. Scott 25 Ohio (N. S.) 86; Potter Warner 91 Penn. St. 362.
-
62 N.H. 159 Supreme Court of New HampshireJune 5, 1882
Y. 459, 463 ; Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286, 289 . So far as the question of civil liability is concerned, there is no distinction, except it .may be in the measure of damages (Fay v. Parker, 53 N. H. 342, Bixby v. Dunlap, 56 N.
-
37 L.R.A. 830 Supreme Court of IowaApril 10, 1897 Dissent
Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 ; Hitchcock y Burgett, 38 Mich. 501 ; Chamberlain y. Porter, 9 Minn. 260 ; Geiselman v, Scott, 25 Ohio St. 86 ; Beb&r y. Herring, 110 Pa. 599 ; Linfcy. Sheldon, 45 N. Y. S. R. 165.
-
56 Ind. 497 Indiana Supreme CourtMay 15, 1877
Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 ; Scudder v. Crossan, supra.
-
68 Me. 552 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineDecember 19, 1878
Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 . See, also, cases and authorities before cited. The defendant, however, does not admit that the plaintiff stands in the favorable attitude supposed. He claims that upon this point the plaintiff’s case fails.
-
88 N.W. 839 Supreme Court of IowaJanuary 24, 1902
French, 92 Iowa, 695 ; Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 ; Rabe v. Sommerheck, 94 Iowa, 656 .
-
95 Ind. 376 Indiana Supreme CourtMay 14, 1884
Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 , cited by the appellant, where it was held that if the negligence of the patient can be separated from that of the physician, the patient may recover for such separate injury as proceeded solely from the distinct negligence of the physician
-
62 A.2d 174 Supreme Judicial Court of MaineOctober 26, 1948
Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 . The requested instruction was too broad and properly refused.
-
26 N.E. 415 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJanuary 10, 1891
Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286, 289 . Marble v. Ross, 124 Mass. 44, 48 . Davies v. Mann, 10 M. & W. 546. Tuff v. Warman, 5 C. B. (N. S.) 573, 585. Radley v. London & North Western Railway, 1 App. Cas. 754, 759.
-
80 P. 903 Oregon Supreme CourtMay 15, 1905
E. 354 ); Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 . 8. Now, to come again to the instructions: They relate to the patient’s observance of the directions given him by the *432 defendants.
-
291 Mass. 221 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJune 25, 1935
The case is closely parallel to Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 . The exception taken raises no question as to the correctness of the instruction given on the burden of proof in so far as it related to contributory negligence. G. L. (Ter.
-
25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 86 Ohio Supreme CourtDecember 15, 1874
Smith, 2 Pick. 621 ; Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 . This principle, as well as the evidence in the case, were entirely ignored, by the instructions asked to be given to the jury by plaintiff's counsel.
-
1 Hosea's Rep. 110 Ohio Superior Court, CincinnatiJuly 1, 1907
St., 362; Hibbard v. Thomson, 109 Mass., 286 .