TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Lindenbaum v. N.Y., New Haven, & Hartford R.R., 84 N.E. 129 (Mass. 1908)

127 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Warner v. Fuller
    139 N.E. 811 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJune 5, 1923

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . Hilden v.

  2. Commonwealth v. Sacco
    151 N.E. 839 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMay 12, 1926

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . It was proper, in redirect examination, to interrogate the witness further as to his recollection of what took place on the train and his certainty as to whether Vanzetti was the man.

  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Starks
    106 N.E. 646 Indiana Court of AppealsNovember 6, 1914

    E. 1066 ; Lindenbaum v. New York, etc., R. Co. (1908), 197 Mass. 314 , 84 N. E. 129 ; Lautner v. Kann (1898), 184 Pa. St. 334, 39 Atl. 55 ; 6 Ency. Pl. and Pr. 694. 4.

  4. Mitchell v. Saunders
    13 S.E.2d 242 Supreme Court of North CarolinaFebruary 26, 1941

    Fall River Iron Works Co. , 200 Mass. 188 , 86 N.E. 310 ; Lindenbaum v. N. Y., N. H., Hudson R. Co. , 197 Mass. 314 , 84 N.E. 129 ; Gannon v. LaClede Gaslight Co. , 145 Mo., 502 , 43 L. R. C., 505, 46 S.W. 908 , 47 S.W. 907 .

  5. National Bank of the Republic v. Price
    234 P. 231 Utah Supreme CourtNovember 19, 1923

    And see generally in this connection Lindenbaum v. N. Y., N. H. & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 ( 84 N. E. 129 ); Domelman v. Brazier, 198 Mass. 458, 465 ( 84 N. E. 856 ); Giles v. Giles, 204 Mass. 383, 385 ( 90 N.

  6. Perry v. Hanover
    50 N.E.2d 41 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJune 28, 1943

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 . Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway, 309 Mass. 205, 206 .

  7. Commonwealth v. Russ
    232 Mass. 58 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJanuary 23, 1919

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . Sullivan v. Old Colony Street Railway, 200 Mass. 303, 309 . Giles v. Giles, 204 Mass. 383, 385 . The uncontroverted facts in Commonwealth v.

  8. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.
    167 N.E. 235 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJune 4, 1929

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 . Although mere disbelief of testimony is not proof of *519 facts of an opposite nature or tendency, Wakefield v. American Surety Co. of New York, 209 Mass. 173, 177 . Laidlaw v.

  9. Rosenfield v. United States Trust Co.
    195 N.E. 323 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMarch 25, 1935

    New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 , warranted the jury in finding the following facts: In April, 1933, the building in question was vacant and needed extensive alteration before it would be fit for occupancy. Abraham C.

  10. Owen v. Williams
    77 N.E.2d 318 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtFebruary 4, 1948

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 . O’Brien v. Harvard Restaurant & Liquor Co. Inc. 310 Mass. 491, 493 .

  11. Commonwealth v. McInerney
    365 N.E.2d 815 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJuly 28, 1977

    Lindenbaum v. New York N.H. & H.R.R., 197 Mass. 314 323 (1908). See Jones v. Commonwealth, 331 Mass. 169, 171-172 (1954).

  12. McDonough v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
    117 N.E. 836 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtNovember 27, 1917

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 . In this respect the case is distinguishable from Holden v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 188 Mass. *454 213 , where evidence was necessarily taken as true or conceded.

  13. Commonwealth v. Soaris
    175 N.E. 491 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtApril 6, 1931

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . The assignment of errors numbered 11 is not argued but it discloses no error if it be considered on its merits.

  14. Ryan v. Fall River Iron Works Co.
    86 N.E. 310 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtNovember 24, 1908

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 .

  15. McDonough v. Vozzela
    142 N.E. 831 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtFebruary 25, 1924

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 . Commonwealth v. Russ, 232 Mass. 58, 70 . Mere disbelief of testimony is not proof of facts of an opposite nature or tendency. Wakefield v. American Surety Co. 209 Mass. 173, 177 .

  16. Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
    34 N.E.2d 642 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMay 28, 1941

    Old Colony Street Railway, 200 Mass. 303, 309 ; and may disbelieve a party’s witnesses in toto, Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 .

  17. C. W. Hunt Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
    85 N.E. 446 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJune 9, 1908

    See Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 , and cases there cited.

  18. Larson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
    98 N.E. 1048 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJune 4, 1912

    It was perhaps intimated in Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 324 , that published rules might be modified by oral instructions; but the question whether the doctrine of Stevens v.

  19. Godfrey v. Caswell
    72 N.E.2d 402 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtApril 1, 1947

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . Lydon v. Boston Elevated Railway, 309 Mass. 205 . Reardon Importing Co. v. Security Trust Co. 318 Mass. 304, 307 .

  20. Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
    103 N.E. 693 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtDecember 23, 1913

    Hence the rule of Lindenbaum, v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 , does not apply, and it has not been argued by the defendant that it does. Exceptions overruled.

  21. Wilson v. Grace
    173 N.E. 524 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtNovember 24, 1930

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 , 323 and cases cited. Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp. 267 Mass. 501 518 .

  22. Sullivan v. Old Colony Street Railway
    86 N.E. 511 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtNovember 30, 1908

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . Commonwealth v. McNeese, 156 Mass. 231 . Exceptions overruled,

  23. Commonwealth v. Davis
    187 N.E. 33 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtSeptember 12, 1933

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 . Tax Collector of Lowell v. Hanchett, 240 Mass. 557, 561 . Cosman v. Donovan, 282 Mass. 224, 228 .

  24. Collins v. Casualty Co. of America
    112 N.E. 634 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMay 23, 1916

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314 . And a predisposition to rupture does not come within the cases of Brown v. Greenfield Life Association, 172 Mass. 498 ; Rainger v. Boston Mutual Life Association, 167 Mass. 109 ; Dolan v.

  25. Commonwealth v. Dorr
    103 N.E. 902 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJanuary 9, 1914

    Lindenbaum v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad, 197 Mass. 314, 323 .

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list