Citing references
Opinions citing Semerjian v. Stetson, 187 N.E. 829 (Mass. 1933)
47 citing cases
-
670 N.E.2d 404 Massachusetts Appeals CourtSeptember 26, 1996
Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 (1933), in support of that proposition, the court *379 misread that case.
-
492 F. Supp. 755 D. MassachusettsJune 5, 1980
Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N.E. 829 (1933), the Supreme Judicial Court held that res ipsa loquitur could not be applied to defeat a motion for directed verdict in a medical malpractice case based on alleged negligence of a physician engaged to perform surgery
-
56 Mass. App. Dec. 1 Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.August 4, 1975
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 . Bouffard v. Canby, 292 Mass. 305 . 7.
-
21 Mass. L. Rptr. 736 Massachusetts Superior CourtOctober 25, 2006
See Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 514 (1933) (holding jury not warranted in inferring that a doctor’s use of drops was negligent).
-
391 F.3d 411 Second CircuitDecember 9, 2004
Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N.E. 829, 831 (1933) (holding that " res ipsa loquitur is not applicable" where a physician placed a liquid substance on the plaintiff's eye, and the eye immediately thereafter became inflamed and pained, and the plaintiff eventually
-
103 P.2d 640 New Mexico Supreme CourtJune 12, 1940
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N.E. 829 .
-
20 Wis. 2d 1 Wisconsin Supreme CourtApril 30, 1963
W. (2d) 207 ; Semerjian v. Stetson (1933), 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N. E. 829 ; Facer v. Lewis (1950), 326 Mich. 702 , 40 N. W. (2d) 457 ; Wallstedt v. Swedish Hospital (1945), 220 Minn. 274 , 19 N. W. (2d) 426 ; Sanders v.
-
277 N.E.2d 681 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJanuary 10, 1972
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 515 .
-
584 F. Supp. 2d 418 D. MassachusettsNovember 5, 2008
See Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512 , 187 N.E. 829 (1933). Because she would have been required to present expert testimony to meet this burden, see Haggerty v.
-
19 N.E.2d 33 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtJanuary 31, 1939
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 514 . Goode v. Lothrop, 266 Mass. 518, 520 . Toy v. Mackintosh, 222 Mass. 430, 432 . See Vigneault v. Dr. Hewson Dental Co. 300 Mass. 223, 225 ; Gabrunas v. Miniter, 289 Mass. 20, 22 .
-
4 F.3d 123 Second CircuitAugust 26, 1993
Brown, 318 Md. 418 , 569 A.2d 202, 205 (1990); Massachusetts, see Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N.E. 829, 830-31 (1933); Minnesota, see Todd v.
-
110 P.2d 260 Wyoming Supreme CourtFebruary 18, 1941
Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N. E. 829 . The statements in these cases were much more serious and much more definite than the statements in the case at bar, but were held insufficient to show negligence.
-
166 N.E.2d 894 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMay 5, 1960
See Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 513 .
-
7 N.E.2d 437 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMarch 30, 1937
Clement, 287 Mass. 175 , Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , and similar cases.
-
824 F. Supp. 268 D. MassachusettsMay 10, 1993
Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512 , 187 N.E. 829 (1933) (“The burden [is] on the plaintiff to establish a causal connection between negligence of the doctor and [the plaintiffs] injuries; that is to prove that an act or omission of the doctor caused the injury and
-
285 N.W. 889 Supreme Court of MinnesotaMarch 24, 1939
To these may be added Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , 187 N. E. 829 , where it was held that admissions of an eye doctor somewhat similar to those made by Dr. Walker September 16, 1937, as testified to by plaintiff and Mrs.
-
23 Mass. App. Dec. 19 Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.July 1, 1961
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 ; C. v. Doherty, 137 Mass. 245 .
-
19 Mass. L. Rptr. 655 Massachusetts Superior CourtJuly 13, 2005
Spievack, 16 Mass.App.Ct. 488,492 (1983), citing Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512 (1933).
-
15 Mass. App. Div. 186 Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div.September 28, 1950
In the case of Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510 , an action was brought against a physician for alleged negligence in treating the plaintiff’s eye, the plaintiff subsequently having lost the sight of the eye.
-
545 N.E.2d 602 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtOctober 19, 1989
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512 (1933). This causal link generally must be established by expert testimony that the injury was more probably than not a result of the physician's negligence. See Berardi v. Menicks, 340 Mass. 396, 402 (1960).
-
181 N.E.2d 562 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtApril 10, 1962
See Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512-513, 514-515 ; Berardi v. Menicks, 340 Mass. 396, 400-402 . Dr. Breault testified that "it is standard appendectomy procedure to remove the appendix completely, leaving no stump or vestige at the cecum."
-
452 N.E.2d 287 Massachusetts Appeals CourtAugust 8, 1983
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512 (1933). Samii v. Baystate Medical Center, Inc., 8 Mass. App. Ct. 911, 912 (1979).
-
437 N.E.2d 543 Massachusetts Appeals CourtJuly 16, 1982
Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 514 (1933).
-
15 N.E.2d 185 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMay 23, 1938
Crofwell, 272 Mass. 172, 175 ; Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 512-513 ; Bouffard v. Canby, 292 Mass. 305, 309 .
-
69 N.E.2d 581 Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtNovember 4, 1946
Belmore, 248 Mass. 108, 114 ; Semerjian v. Stetson, 284 Mass. 510, 514 . Nor is it a case lacking in proof of causal connection between the lack of such care and the ensuing injuries, as in Wright v. Clement, 287 Mass. 175 .