Citing references
Opinions citing Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949)
14 citing cases
-
394 F.2d 57 Sixth CircuitMay 2, 1968
Weide-ner, 8 Ohio App.2d 199 , 195 N.E.2d 813 ; Modrzynski v. Lust, Ohio App., 88 N.E.2d 76 , 55 Ohio Law Abst. 106 .
-
227 N.W.2d 10 Nebraska Supreme CourtMarch 20, 1975
Bass (Miss.), 254 S. 2d 183; Modrzynski v. Lust, 55 Ohio L. Abs. 106 , 88 N. E. 2d 76 ; Perin v. Hayne (Iowa), 210 N. W. 2d 609 ; Brear v. Sweet, 155 Wash. 474 , 284 P. 803 ; Hart v. Steele (Mo.), 416 S. W. 2d 927 , 37 A. L. R. 3d 456; and Tady v.
-
213 N.E.2d 168 Ohio Supreme CourtDecember 29, 1965
E. 2d 373 ; Modrzynski v. Lust (1949), 55 Ohio Law Abs. 106 , 88 N. E. 2d 76 ; and Shutts v. Siehl (1959), 109 Ohio App. 145 , 164 N. E. 2d 443 , refusing to apply it. But cf. Bradshaw v. Wilson (1950), 87 Ohio App. 319 , 94 N. E. 2d 706 .
-
348 So. 2d 905 District Court of Appeal of FloridaJune 29, 1977
*909 In Modrzynski v.
-
314 F. Supp. 905 N.D. OhioJuly 2, 1970
OS No. 35496, 3-12-58; Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 , 55 O.L.A. 106 (App., 1949); Edwards v. Wiggins, Ohio Com. Pl., 114 N.E.2d 504 , 65 O.L.A. 292 (C.P., 1953). See also, Urdang v. Drs.
-
770 P.2d 182 Washington Supreme CourtMarch 30, 1989
Steele, 416 S.W.2d 927, 932 , 37 A.L.R.3d 456, 462 (Mo. 1967), quoting Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).
-
121 P.R. Dec. 639 Supreme Court of Puerto RicoJune 17, 1988
Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 (1949); Siverson v. Weber, 372 P.2d 97 (1962); Le Prince v. McLeod, 179 So. 2d 856 (1965); Block v.
-
416 S.W.2d 927 Supreme Court of MissouriJuly 10, 1967
In Modrzynski v. Lust, Ohio App., 88 N.E.2d 76 , a surgeon who performed a hysterectomy was charged with negligently puncturing the bladder during the operation, causing a fistula and leakage.
-
88 P.R. Dec. 315 Supreme Court of Puerto RicoMay 9, 1963
Wirts, 127 A.2d 706 (Pa. 1966); Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio 1949); 82 A.L.R.2d 1257 ; 67 A.L.R.2d 379 ; 141 A.L.R. 5 , suplementado en 81 A.L.R.2d 697 ; Louisell and Williams, Trial of Medical Malpractice Cases (1960), párrafo 14.06, pág. 436; R.
-
220 S.W.3d 319 Missouri Court of AppealsFebruary 5, 2007
Steele, 416 S.W.2d 927, 932 (Mo.1967), quoting Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76, 77 (Ohio App.1949).
-
195 N.E.2d 813 Ohio Court of AppealsJanuary 23, 1964
See Modrzynski v. Lust, 55 Ohio Law Abs., 106 , 88 N. E. (2d), 76. We hold that in this case expert testimony was necessary to establish medical malpractice and since none was produced, we overrule this assignment of error.
-
114 N.E.2d 504 Cuyahoga County Common Pleas CourtMarch 27, 1953
Modrzynski v. Lust, 55 Abs 106 . Expert testimony was necessary to establish the negligent character, if any, of defendant’s conduct in this respect. None was offered.
-
995 P.2d 621 Court of Appeals of WashingtonMarch 23, 2000
Steele, 416 S.W.2d 927, 932 , 37 A.L.R.3d 456, 462 (Mo.1967), quoting Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App.1949).
-
88 P.R. 306 Supreme Court of Puerto RicoMay 9, 1963
Wirts, 127 A.2d 706 (Pa. 1956); Modrzynski v. Lust, 88 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio 1949); 82 A.L.R.2d 1257 ; 57 A.L.R.2d 379 ; 141 A.L.R. 5 , supplemented in 81 A.L.R.2d 597 ; Louisell and Williams, Trial of Medical Malpractice Cases 436, par. 14.06 (1960); R. B. H.