Citing references

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184 (6th Cir.1996), the Sixth Circuit considered a similar issue and held that a police officer did not effect a seizure when he stopped a slowly moving car to talk to the individuals inside the car.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184 (6th Cir.1996), we upheld a warrant authorizing a search of a residence despite only a limited connection between the residence and drug related activity.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1193 (6th Cir.1996). {¶ 23} Finally, in United States v. Brown, 6th Cir. No. 13-1761 (June 27, 2016), the court examined a search warrant that was issued for a residence of a known drug dealer.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (quoting United States v. Lawson, 999 F.2d 985, 987 (6th Cir.1993) (internal quotations omitted)).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192-93 (6th Cir.1996) (finding probable cause based on affidavit that stated, based on affiant-officer's extensive experience, that "`many drug traffickers utilize their homes to conduct their illegal narcotics trafficking activities'");

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184 (6th Cir.1996); United States v. Miggins, 302 F.3d 384 (6th Cir.2002); and United States v. Blair, 214 F.3d 690 (6th Cir.2000). However, the cases cited by the government are distinguishable from the case at hand.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192-93 (6th Cir. 1996) (finding probable cause based on affidavit that stated, based on affiant-officer’s extensive experience, that “‘many drug traffickers utilize their homes to conduct their illegal narcotics trafficking activities

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184 (6th Cir.1996), which he argued may have some bearing on whether there was a reasonable suspicion for Appellant's stop and the subsequent plain view search.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996) ("Police may arrest a person without a warrant if they have probable cause at the time of the arrest to believe that the person has committed or is committing a crime.").

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996)). In the present ease, there is no direct evidence that drugs or drug paraphernalia would be located at Hodge’s home.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1193 (6th Cir.1996) (finding probable cause when affidavit attested to officer's experience that "`many drug traffickers utilize their homes to conduct their illegal narcotics trafficking activities'").

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996). On the date of the warrant, Captain Lutz had information that Harris had ordered the bacteria and had misrepresented himself to ATCC, and that the bacteria had been delivered to his residence earlier that day.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996). “Probable cause ... does not require any showing that the officer’s suspicions prove to be correct or that they are more likely true than false.” Id.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996). “Probable cause ... does not require any showing that the officer’s suspicions prove to be correct or that they are more likely true than false.” Id.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir.1996).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1193 (6th Cir.1996). Some courts have even drawn an inference that drug dealers are likely to keep drugs in their homes even in the absence of evidence directly supporting that inference. See, e.g., United States v.

.”); United States v. guests (spending several hours at the home of an Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1193 (6th Cir. 1996) (finding acquaintance).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1192 (6th Cir. 1996) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1193 (6th Cir.1996). None of these cases, however, supports the proposition that the defendant’s status as a drug dealer, standing alone, gives rise to a fair probability that drugs will be found in his home.

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1193 (6th Cir.1996) (consideration may be given to the particular experience of the officers conducting the search).

Caicedo, 85 F.3d 1184, 1188 (6th Cir. 1996); see also United States v. Buchanon, 72 F.3d 1217, 1223 (6th Cir. 1995).