1. Stone v. United States Copy cite
   Federal Circuit September 25, 2025 No. 25-1774
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 25-1774 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2025 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROBERT STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ________

2. Rios v. United States Customs and Border Protection Copy cite
   Federal Circuit April 7, 2025 No. 24-1103
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 24-1103 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 04/07/2025 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ J. JESUS RIOS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Respondent

3. Ideal Innovations, Inc. v. United States Copy cite
   Federal Circuit December 3, 2021 No. 20-2065
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 20-2065 Document: 68 Page: 1 Filed: 12/03/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IDEAL INNOVATIONS, INC., RIGHT PROBLEM, LLC, ROBERT KOCHER, Plaintiffs-Appellants

4. Kenyon v. United States Copy cite
   683 F. App'x 945 Federal Circuit April 7, 2017 No. 2016-2549
   Cited by 25 Unpublished

   Per Curiam. Ronald Gene Kenyon (“Kenyon”) appeals from the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“the Claims Court”) dismissing his amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Kenyon v. United States, 127 Fed.Cl.

5. Winview Ip Holdings LLC v. Fanduel, Inc. Copy cite
   Federal Circuit August 19, 2024 No. 24-1652
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 24-1652 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 08/19/2024 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC, Appellant v. FANDUEL, INC., Appellee ________________

6. Benavides v. United States Copy cite
   Federal Circuit April 22, 2026 No. 26-1533
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 26-1533 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 04/22/2026 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GEORGE ANDREW BENAVIDES, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

7. Davis v. Department of Homeland Security Copy cite
   239 F. App'x 586 Federal Circuit May 30, 2007 No. 2006-3061
   Not cited Unpublished

   PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Julia Davis, seeks review of a final decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board” or “MSPB”) denying her Petition for Review of an Initial Decision of an Administrative Judge concluding that she voluntarily resigned from

8. Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. Copy cite
   417 F. App'x 976 Federal Circuit April 11, 2011 Nos. 2011-1191, -1192, -1193, -1194
   Not cited Unpublished

   ORDER PER CURIAM. The appellants move for a stay, pending appeal, of the permanent injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. SynQor, Inc. opposes. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et ah, Bel Fuse, Inc., and Cherokee

9. In re TSAI Copy cite
   Federal Circuit November 30, 2020 No. 20-1347
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 20-1347 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 11/30/2020 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: DAVID TSAI, Appellant ______________________ 2020-1347 ____________

10. Keynetik, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Copy cite
    Federal Circuit January 27, 2021 No. 20-1271
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 20-1271 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KEYNETIK, INC., Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ___

11. Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc. Copy cite
    675 F. App'x 1001 Federal Circuit January 18, 2017 No. 2016-1616
    Cited by 25 Unpublished

    Newman, Circuit Judge. The CQG companies appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, holding that the asserted claims of U.S. Patents No. 6,772,132 (“the T32 patent”) and No. 6,766,304 (“the '304 patent”) recite

12. Virtual Solutions LLC v. Microsoft Corporation Copy cite
    Federal Circuit November 8, 2013 No. 13-1250
    Not cited Unpublished

    Note: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VIRTUAL SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1250 _

13. Sherwin-Williams Company v. Ppg Industries, Inc. Copy cite
    Federal Circuit July 25, 2024 No. 22-2059
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 22-2059 Document: 62 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/2024 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.,

14. Howard v. Hhs Copy cite
    Federal Circuit June 7, 2024 No. 23-1816
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 23-1816 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 06/07/2024 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MARC HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

15. Cgs-Asp Security, Jv, LLC v. United States Copy cite
    Federal Circuit August 30, 2024 No. 23-1471
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 23-1471 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 08/30/2024 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CGS-ASP SECURITY, JV, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

16. Johnson v. Department of Veterans Affairs Copy cite
    581 F. App'x 855 Federal Circuit July 14, 2014 No. 2014-3076
    Not cited Unpublished

    PER CURIAM. Earlene Johnson (“Johnson”) appeals from the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“the Board”) denying her request for corrective action after the Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) terminated her employment during her probationary

17. Integrated Advertising Labs, LLC v. Revcontent, LLC Copy cite
    Federal Circuit April 8, 2024 No. 23-1392
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 23-1392 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 04/08/2024 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTEGRATED ADVERTISING LABS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. REVCONTENT, LLC,

18. United States v. American Home Assurance Company Copy cite
    Federal Circuit April 18, 2024 No. 24-1069
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 24-1069 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 04/18/2024 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

19. Cagan-Teuber v. MSPB Copy cite
    Federal Circuit April 30, 2024 No. 23-1824
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 23-1824 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2024 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ KALMAN SAMUEL CAGAN-TEUBER, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent

20. Bates v. Army Copy cite
    Federal Circuit August 24, 2010 No. 2010-1313
    Not cited Unpublished

    l\`Il\rl'1'l1. |'l\l..$,. ,.....-.I,.... J,~. ...,......-..-,.,....-.l,....J-.',.l 1 §§'_.-jr-;‘_'§..\ri ¢_.--__ ~ rWr.~\¢-,_‘ iii .1‘ia1wr _¢-§§ '\_','iv.;'_1-.j~_!‘5\__~5'§-~ : § ?f'_7?§7..i.".!7:§9._ 5 § = 11 511 5 ...'e - ___! __ _xl _ n'__.. ____ ._ __ __

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.