-
429 F. App'x 995 Federal Circuit July 12, 2011 No. 2011-5068Cited by 48 Unpublished
Hampel sustained a wound due to allegedly negligent treatment by DVA doctors and medical staff. The wound became infected and required surgery at another DVA hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. Mrs.
-
108 F.3d 1393 Federal Circuit March 7, 1997 No. 96-5079Cited by 4 Unpublished
Prior to decedent's death, his parents, Wilford and Deborah Arrington, in their individual capacities and on behalf of decedent, sued the hospital where decedent was born and the attending physicians, alleging negligence and gross
-
121 F. App'x 854 Federal Circuit January 19, 2005 No. 2004-5142Not cited Unpublished
In its decision on June 17, 2004, the court found that McGlohon’s claims of negligence on the part of the Army physicians “are plainly tortious in nature,” for which the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction under the Federal Torts
-
524 F. App'x 690 Federal Circuit May 9, 2013 No. 2013-7027Cited by 1 Unpublished
The Board then sought an independent medical evaluation from another physician, Dr. Grem. Dr.
Grem opined that the VA’s failure to detect the tumor was not negligent, based both on the absence of any VA records establishing that Mr.
Haynes had complained to his VA physicians of abdominal pain and on the rarity of colon cancer among individuals matching Mr. Haynes’s demographic profile. The VA regional office denied Ms.
-
861 F.2d 728 Federal Circuit September 8, 1988 No. 88-3003Not cited Unpublished
they got Case in custody they searched his place and found the bottle: three tablets were gone, and the label was as stated. 10 The AJ concluded that Case was "negligent," but purporting to apply the time-honored legal test of negligence
, he finds: 11 I find that a reasonable person would have consulted with his physician or pharmacist before mixing drugs and alcohol or perhaps not have mixed them at all. 12 In a footnote he supports the argument with a statement