-
770 F.2d 1084 Eleventh Circuit August 5, 1985 No. 84-3196Not cited
770 F.2d 1084 Griffin v. Wainwright 84-3196 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. 8/5/85 M.D.Fla., 760 F.2d 1505
-
773 F.2d 1237 Eleventh Circuit September 4, 1985 No. 84-5693Not cited
773 F.2d 1237 U.S. v. Lopez-Perez 84-5693 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. 9/4/85 1 S.D.Fla. AFFIRMED
-
7 F.4th 1046 Eleventh Circuit August 4, 2021 No. 19-11156
USCA11 Case: 19-11156 Date Filed: 08/04/2021 Page: 1 of 21 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11156 ________________________ Agency No. A091-443-372 CHARLES KEVIN SIMPSON, Petitioner
-
Eleventh Circuit October 20, 2025 No. 24-10478Not cited Unpublished
USCA11 Case: 24-10478 Document: 50-1 Date Filed: 10/20/2025 Page: 1 of 27 NOT FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-10478 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ ROBERT W. OTTO,
-
157 F.3d 1259 Eleventh Circuit October 14, 1998 No. 97-8592
HATCHETT, Chief Judge: In this appeal, we address an issue of first impression in the circuits: whether corporate insiders’ exercise of stock appreciation rights for cash from their employing company implicates the insider trading laws of §§ 10(b), 20(d) and
-
769 F.2d 672 Eleventh Circuit August 6, 1985 No. 84-8327Cited by 27 Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part · Young
GEORGE C. YOUNG, District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: While concurring in the Court’s analysis and conclusion on each of the Sandstrom and the closing argument issues, I disagree that the petitioner is entitled to relief based on an alleged
-
760 F.2d 1148 Eleventh Circuit May 20, 1985 No. 84-5377Cited by 6 Dissent · Hill
*1154 JAMES C. HILL, Circuit Judge dissenting: The rule of law announced in this case is sound. See Hutchins v. Wainwright, 715 F.2d 512 (11th Cir.1983). I believe, however, that its application upon the facts of this record is misplaced. I therefore dissent
-
760 F.2d 1231 Eleventh Circuit May 21, 1985 No. 84-3591Cited by 67 Dissent · Fay
FAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Most respectfully, I disagree that the clause before us is subject to two interpretations or is ambiguous. The contract provision reads, “Place of jurisdiction is Sao Paulo/Brazil.” (emphasis added) Place is singular. Is is singular
-
454 F.3d 1300 Eleventh Circuit July 10, 2006 No. 04-13977
454 F.3d 1300 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David E. MARTINELLI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 04-13977. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. July 10, 2006. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Edward T.M. Garland
-
777 F.2d 621 Eleventh Circuit February 10, 1986 No. 84-8481Cited by 32 Concurrence · Tjoflat
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, specially concurring: I would dismiss this appeal for want of a final judgment; the district court’s dispositive order, granting a portion of the habeas relief petitioner requested, did not dispose of all of petitioner’s claims. My view
-
763 F.2d 1374 Eleventh Circuit June 25, 1985 No. 83-8470
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff below, Ernest Menendez, appeals from an order of the district court directing a verdict in favor of the appellees, Perishable Distributors, Inc., and Edgar Newton Crowe, Jr. Menendez claims the district court erroneously allowed
-
975 F.2d 1518 Eleventh Circuit October 28, 1992 Nos. 91-3295, 91-3338
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: This case consists of two consolidated appeals resulting from a lawsuit filed by Karen Miranda Hopewell (“Miranda” or “plaintiff”) against B & B Cash Grocery Store, Inc. (“B & B” or “defendant”), alleg *1522 ing gender-based discrimination
-
966 F.2d 1383 Eleventh Circuit July 22, 1992 No. 90-3462Cited by 40 Dissent · Roney
RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge, dissenting in part: I concur in all of the court’s opinion except the decision that the concealed possession of the toy gun requires sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(2)(C) (Nov.1989). The commentary defining a dangerous
-
967 F.2d 516 Eleventh Circuit August 3, 1992 No. 90-7108
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Patricia Davis was one of séveral Alabama legislators investigated for taking bribes. She was convicted by a jury of four counts of violating the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 . She appeals the district court’s failure to grant her a continuance
-
990 F.2d 598 Eleventh Circuit May 10, 1993 No. 91-7977Cited by 22 Concurrence · Birch
BIRCH, Circuit Judge, Specially concurring: While I concur in the result in this case, I am persuaded that the determinative Alabama law is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation. Seasoned Alabama judges, albeit on the federal bench, differ in their
-
903 F.2d 1368 Eleventh Circuit May 29, 1990 No. 89-8258Cited by 13 Concurrence · Tjoflat
TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, concurring: I concur in the court’s opinion: it is an accurate account of this circuit’s law. I write separately simply to express my continuing dissatisfaction with this court’s distortion of the final judgment rule in cases such as Blake
-
688 F. App'x 854 Eleventh Circuit June 5, 2017 No. 16-14558 Non-Argument CalendarNot cited Unpublished
PER CURIAM: Randall Milner appeals from his sentence of eight months’ imprisonment followed by a life term of supervised release, imposed after committing four violations of the terms of his original supervised release. On appeal, Milner contends the district
-
Eleventh Circuit December 1, 2020 No. 19-13989Not cited Unpublished
USCA11 Case: 19-13989 Date Filed: 12/01/2020 Page: 1 of 13 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13989 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-
-
Eleventh Circuit December 1, 2020 No. 19-13178Not cited Unpublished
USCA11 Case: 19-13178 Date Filed: 12/01/2020 Page: 1 of 17 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13178 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cv-00188-RSB-CLR JUSTIN OLTMANNS
-
354 F.3d 1301 Eleventh Circuit December 22, 2003 No. 02-13155Not cited
354 F.3d 1301 ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. CRESENT HILLS APARTMENTS, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant, Bauer Agency, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Claimant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee
Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.