1. Optimum Services, Inc. v. McHugh Copy cite
   582 F. App'x 879 Federal Circuit November 7, 2014 No. 2014-1228
   Cited by 2

   JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

2. Datatreasury Corp. v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n Copy cite
   432 F. App'x 974 Federal Circuit October 7, 2011 Nos. 2011-1587, 2011-1604, 2011-1605
   Not cited

   ON MOTION ORDER The parties move to dismiss Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC and The Clearing House Payments Company L.L.C. as parties in 2011-1587 and to withdraw The Clearing House Payments Company L.L.C.’s appeal no. 2011-1604, and Viewpointe Archive Services

3. Vasquez v. McDonald Copy cite
   583 F. App'x 914 Federal Circuit November 13, 2014 No. 2015-7001
   Not cited

   ON MOTION ORDER Upon review of Rafael Vasquez’s motion to voluntarily withdraw this appeal, It Is ORDERED That: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) All pending motions are moot. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

4. Veres v. McDonald Copy cite
   613 F. App'x 927 Federal Circuit August 14, 2015 No. 2014-7125
   Not cited

   JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

5. R.R. Gregory Corp. v. McHugh Copy cite
   607 F. App'x 974 Federal Circuit June 4, 2015 No. 2014-1813
   Not cited

   JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

6. Mansfield v. Department of Justice Copy cite
   607 F. App'x 990 Federal Circuit June 8, 2015 No. 2015-3007
   Not cited

   JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

7. Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. James Copy cite
   617 F. App'x 996 Federal Circuit September 21, 2015 No. 2014-1809
   Not cited

   JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

8. First Quality Baby Products, LLC v. Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Copy cite
   618 F. App'x 686 Federal Circuit October 14, 2015 No. 2015-1208
   Not cited

   JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

9. Stone v. United States Copy cite
   Federal Circuit September 25, 2025 No. 25-1774
   Not cited Unpublished

   Case: 25-1774 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2025 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROBERT STONE, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ________

10. Faro v. Matal Copy cite
    697 F. App'x 1025 Federal Circuit October 4, 2017 No. 2016-2716
    Not cited

    JUDGMENT Per Curiam This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

11. Rios v. United States Customs and Border Protection Copy cite
    Federal Circuit April 7, 2025 No. 24-1103
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 24-1103 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 04/07/2025 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ J. JESUS RIOS, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Respondent

12. Roseberry v. Collins Copy cite
    133 F.4th 1047 Federal Circuit March 31, 2025 No. 23-2288
    Cited by 1

    Case: 23-2288 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 03/31/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GEORGE ROSEBERRY, Claimant-Appellant v. DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee _____

13. Husteel Co. v. United States Copy cite
    710 F. App'x 890 Federal Circuit February 7, 2018 Nos. 2016-2732, 2017-1013, 2017-1014
    Cited by 1

    Per Curiam JUDGMENT (Moore, Mayer, and Stoll, Circuit Judges). This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

14. Neutral Tandem, Inc. v. Peerless Network, LLC Copy cite
    458 F. App'x 904 Federal Circuit June 16, 2011 Nos. 2011-1144, 2011-1181
    Not cited

    ORDER The parties having so agreed, it is *905 ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).

15. Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. United States Copy cite
    311 F. App'x 349 Federal Circuit June 25, 2008 Nos. 2006-5099, 2006-5100
    Not cited

    ON MOTION NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves without opposition to reverse the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims in Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. United States, No. 97-cv-00068 and remand with instructions to dismiss Cyprus

16. Ideal Innovations, Inc. v. United States Copy cite
    Federal Circuit December 3, 2021 No. 20-2065
    Not cited Unpublished

    Case: 20-2065 Document: 68 Page: 1 Filed: 12/03/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IDEAL INNOVATIONS, INC., RIGHT PROBLEM, LLC, ROBERT KOCHER, Plaintiffs-Appellants

17. Modernatx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation Copy cite
    Federal Circuit December 1, 2021 No. 20-1184
    Not cited

    Case: 20-1184 Document: 135 Page: 1 Filed: 12/01/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MODERNATX, INC., FKA MODERNA THERAPEUTICS, INC., Appellant v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION, FKA PROTIVA BIOTHERAPEUTICS

18. Porter v. Department of the Navy Copy cite
    521 F. App'x 927 Federal Circuit July 18, 2013 No. 2013-3013
    Not cited

    JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

19. Kenyon v. United States Copy cite
    683 F. App'x 945 Federal Circuit April 7, 2017 No. 2016-2549
    Cited by 25 Unpublished

    Per Curiam. Ronald Gene Kenyon (“Kenyon”) appeals from the final judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“the Claims Court”) dismissing his amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Kenyon v. United States, 127 Fed.Cl.

20. Asher v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. Copy cite
    516 F. App'x 920 Federal Circuit May 29, 2013 No. 2013-1043
    Not cited

    JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.