It is averred that it was caused by her negligence, but that was abandoned on the trial, and the Uaim set up in the testimony that she was negligent in her conduct after her injury.

The doctors testified that they told her she might work, and she went to work. After she had stood upon her feet for a while she found that this injury grew worse, until she had to quit work.

And the fact that the physicians virtually told her that she might work, would be very strong evidence, I think, to convince a jury that she had not acted negligently in undertaking to work before she ought to work.

sidewalk, which was caused by a board being out, and he claims that the city was negligent in having and- permitting a sidewalk to be in that condition at the time of this injury, and that he, the plaintiff, was without any fault or negligence

He claims to have been seriously injured; alleges that he is a physician having a practice, as he claims, of about twenty years or a little over, at the time of his injury, and that on account of his injuries he had been confined to

sidewalk, which was caused by a board being out, and he claims that the city was negligent in having and permitting a sidewalk to be in that condition at the time of this injury, and that he, the plaintiff, was without <any fault or negligence

He claims to have been seriously injured; alleges that he is a physician, having a practice, as he claims, of about twenty years or a little over, at the time ot his injury, and that on account of his injuries he had been confined