TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law
160 cases · browse · 0.07 s
  1. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 280 Court of Chancery of South Carolina January 19, 1722
    Not cited

    On Reading the Orders of this Court of the 4th and 5th instant Mr El-lery 12 of Counsil with the Complainants moved that the Parties Agreement established the 5th inst. by Order of this Court, may be inlarged with the following addition (which was drawn up in

  2. Kennard v. Moore
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 314 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1724
    Not cited

    Upon further consideration this day had by this Court, of the Complainant’s Bill, and the Defendants Plea and answer put in thereunto, referred by an Order of this Court of the 14th Ultimo; The Scope of part of the Complainant’s Bill being to pray Equity of Redemption

  3. Godin v. Guerard
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 283 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1722
    Not cited

    Upon opening the matter this present day unto this Court, by Mr. Allein and Major Blakewey, being of the Complaintants Counsel, it was prayed that the Complainants (having exhibited their Bill into this Court against the Defendants to be relieved for the matters

  4. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 345 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1729
    Not cited

    Mr. Ellery pro Quer. Moves That Publication Pass in this Cause On Monday next, And that the said Cause be set downe to be heard on Thursday then next.

  5. Kinnaird v. Moore
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 336 Court of Chancery of South Carolina August 5, 1727
    Not cited

    On Motion this day made to this Honourable Court by Mr. Ellery of the Respondents Council praying that The Petition and Affidavitt of Yesterdays date might be read and read accordingly, Mr. Hume of Council for the Complainant moving for a Writt of Priviledge and

  6. Green v. Browne
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 346 Court of Chancery of South Carolina February 20, 1729
    Not cited

    This Cause comeing this day to be heard before this Court in the presence of Council learned on both sides The Substance of the Complainants Bill appeared to be for the discovery of Assets in order to discharge a Summe of Seventy two pounds Sterling for which a

  7. Hext v. Paycom
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 346 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1729
    Not cited

    Upon Motion of Mr. Attorney General Ordered That the Exceptions in this Cause appointed to be Argued this day Doe Stand over to be Argued to morrow. *347 Adjourned till tomorrow. Hen Hargrave Deputy Register in Cane.

  8. Streete v. Drayton
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 347 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1729
    Not cited

    Ordered That the Defendant Doe Enter his [original manuscript mutilated] Adjourned. Hen Hargrave Deputy Register in Cane.

  9. Delamare v. Blake
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 333 Court of Chancery of South Carolina December 2, 1726
    Not cited

    Mr. Whitaker of Council for The Plantiff [interlined Defendant?] moved to have the last Order read, as also the Defendants Amendments in his *334 Said Answer which was read Accordingly and The Defendant having since put in a full and present Answer to the plantiffs

  10. Weekley v. Rhett
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 271 Court of Chancery of South Carolina December 2, 1721
    Not cited

    Per Thos Lamboll Deputy Register] To his Excellency Francis Nicholson Esq. Governour etc. and the rest of the Honourable Members of his Majesties Council now Sitting in Chancery. Humbly Complaining Sheweth unto your Honours Your Oratrix Elizabeth Weekley of

  11. Smith v. Beresford
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 277 Court of Chancery of South Carolina January 4, 1722
    Not cited

    Upon Motion this day, made unto this Court, by Mr. Hume of Counsel for the Defendants (Mr. Whitaker, the Complainants Counsel being present) the Order of this Court of the 15th December last past, for dissolving the Injunction obtained by the Complainant for stay

  12. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 306 Court of Chancery of South Carolina August 19, 1723
    Not cited

    Ordered That The Defendants do answer the Plaintiff’s Bill of Complaint in Eight days after service of this Rule. Intr. Tho. Lamboll Deputy Register

  13. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 307 Court of Chancery of South Carolina October 23, 1723
    Not cited

    Upon Consideration this present day had of the humble Petition of the Defendants Charles Sawyer Pemberton and Elizabeth Pemberton, Infants, under the age of Twenty one Years, by Samuel Morris Defendant It is Ordered for the reasons therein contained, that the said

  14. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 307 Court of Chancery of South Carolina October 10, 1723
    Not cited

    Ordered That The Defendant do put in her answer to the Plaintiff’s Bill of Complaint in Eight days after the service of this Rule. Intr. Thos Lamboll Deputy Register

  15. Porter v. Peterson
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 310 Court of Chancery of South Carolina August 13, 1724
    Not cited

    Upon Motion of Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Hume of the Complainant’s Counsel, at the full hearing of this Cause this day before this Court, according as the same was heretofore set down, it was alledged that the Complainant hath two very material Witnesses now present

  16. Kennard v. Moore
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 312 Court of Chancery of South Carolina August 14, 1724
    Not cited

    It is this day Ordered by this Court, with the consent of the Parties Complainant and Defendant and their Counsel, in Court, that this Cause, as it now stands, be set down to be argued immediately. Intr. Tho. Lamboll Deputy Register

  17. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 313 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1724
    Not cited

    It is this day Ordered by this- Court by the consent of Mr. Whitaker and Mr. Hume of the Complainant’s Counsel, and Mr. Hargrave of the Defend *314 ant’s Counsel, that the issue directed to be tried at Law, by a former Order of this Court, made the fifth of July

  18. 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 327 Court of Chancery of South Carolina August 13, 1726
    Not cited

    On Motion this day made by Mr. Hargrave to have the Depositions between Eleanor Wright and Francis Le Brasseur opened. Ordered That they be opened and that Each parties may have Copies of the same. Intr. J. Skene Register

  19. Hall v. Hall
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 293 Court of Chancery of South Carolina July 1, 1722
    Not cited

    Forasmuch as this Cause was Ordered to be set down to be heard at the request of the Complainant without the knowledge or privity of her Counsel; *294 It is this day Ordered by this Court at the Motion of Mr. Allein and Mr. Blake-wey of the Complainants Counsel

  20. Godin v. Guerard
    6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 294 Court of Chancery of South Carolina May 12, 1722
    Not cited

    Upon Motion of the Partys Complainants and Defendants their Council in Court, It is Ordered That N otwithstanding any former Order, the arguing of the Demurrer filed in this Cause, be deferred until the Twenty first day of June next insuing the date hereof, or

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list