1. Grimes v. Talbot Copy cite
   8 Ky. 205 Court of Appeals of Kentucky April 23, 1818
   Not cited

   Judge Logan delivered the opinion of the court. This was an action of detinue for a negro boy, in wThich there was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Several objections were taken to the evidence, and various points moved, for the instruction of the court

2. Smith v. Mitchel Copy cite
   8 Ky. 207 Court of Appeals of Kentucky April 23, 1818
   Cited by 1

   Judge Owsley delivered the opinion of the court. This cjectmbnt was brought in the court below to recover from the appellee the possession of a tract of land, the title whereof was asserted by the appellant under the senior grant. Hardin for appellant. A

3. Baird v. Rowan Copy cite
   8 Ky. 214 Court of Appeals of Kentucky June 4, 1818
   Not cited

   The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal taken by the plaintiff from a judgment rendered in favor of the defendants in an action of ejectment. The lessors of the plaintiff claim title to the land in controversy under patents granted

4. Abney v. Brownlee Copy cite
   8 Ky. 240 Court of Appeals of Kentucky June 10, 1818
   Not cited

   Jüdge Logan delivered the opinion of the court. Abnej and Gill entered into articles in 1802, by which the former covenanted to make to the other a good and lawful right, on or before the 12th of September, then next ensuing, to a certain tract of land therein

5. May v. Slaughter Copy cite
   8 Ky. 252 Court of Appeals of Kentucky June 13, 1818
   Not cited

   The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court. The only question material to be decided in this case is, in substance, the same as that which occurred in the case of Baird and al. vs. Rowan, &c. and for the reasons and upon the principles there stated

6. Taylor's heirs v. Perkins Copy cite
   8 Ky. 253 Court of Appeals of Kentucky June 13, 1818
   Not cited

   The Chief Justice delivered the opinion of the court. The demise laid in the declaration in this case being joint, the circuit court properly rejected the deed offered in evidence by the lessors of the plaintiff in support of their title, inasmuch as the deed

7. Bowman v. Frowman Copy cite
   5 Ky. 233 Court of Appeals of Kentucky July 1, 1810
   Not cited

   OPINION of the Court, by Judge Clark This was aa action of covenant, brought by Frowman, as as-signee of Nathan Mayo, against Bowman, on an arti-cie of'agreement entered into by Mayo of the one part, and Bowman of the other. The article contains reciprocal

8. Duncan v. Duncan Copy cite
   5 Ky. 284 Court of Appeals of Kentucky July 1, 1811
   Not cited

   OPINION of the Court, by Judge Logas. The only question in this cause is, whether a plea of setoff in debt is good, alleging; that a particular sum and no more remained unpaid m virtue of the writing obligatory sued on ; and that the plaintiff was at the time

9. Adams v. Ashby Copy cite
   5 Ky. 287 Court of Appeals of Kentucky July 1, 1811
   Not cited

   ‘OPINION of the Court, by' Ch. J. Boyle this ’was an action of assault and battery. After a verdict fbr the plaintiff, a motion for a new trial was made by the defendant, Founded upon his affidavit, stating in substance, that he had since the tria!, discovered

10. Morris v. Morris Copy cite
    5 Ky. 311 Court of Appeals of Kentucky July 1, 1811
    Not cited

    OPINION of the Court, by Ch. J. Boylf.. Richard Morris in his lifetime conveyed by deed to his son, Maurice Morris, his estate, real and personal, i'he conveyance purports to be made For the sole use and benefit of Maurice Morris, and for and in consideration

11. Creighton v. Johnson Copy cite
    16 Ky. 240 Court of Appeals of Kentucky May 27, 1817
    Not cited

    Opinion of the Court. ON motion, the defendant in error obtained judgment against the plaintiffs, for the amount of a judgement, costs, &c. which had been previously recovered against him as the surety of the intestate. The administrators having denied the

12. Weisiger v. Samuel Copy cite
    16 Ky. 185 Court of Appeals of Kentucky April 21, 1814
    Not cited

    Opinion of the Court. THIS action was brought in the court below by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. The declaration is in assumpsit for the sale and delivery of a quantity of bread. Non-assumpsit was pleaded, and a verdict obtained by

13. Perkins v. Rice Copy cite
    16 Ky. 218 Court of Appeals of Kentucky April 16, 1816
    Cited by 3

    Opinion of the Court, by Judge Owsley. THIS was a suit in chancery, brought by the appellees for the purpose of obtaining the rescision of a contract made for the purchase of a tract of land, including a salt-petre cave, with fixtures, implements, &c. The bill

14. Eastin v. Bell Copy cite
    8 Ky. 617 Court of Appeals of Kentucky October 11, 1819
    Not cited

    Judge Owsley delivered the opinion of the court. * This was an action of detinue, brought by the Bells in the circuit court to recover from Eastin the possession of a family of slaves. On the trial in that court a verdict was found for the Bells; and after

15. Miller v. Anderson Copy cite
    16 Ky. 169 Court of Appeals of Kentucky May 15, 1813
    Not cited

    Opinion or the Court, by Judge Owsley. THE appellant obtained judgment in the Harrison court of quarter sessions, at the April term 1802, against the appellee, and in October 1804, caused a fieri facias to issue from the clerk’s office of the Harrison circuit

16. Blair v. Pollock Copy cite
    16 Ky. 208 Court of Appeals of Kentucky June 10, 1815
    Not cited

    Opinion of the Court, by Ch. J. Boyle. Pollock, as the payee of a bill of exchange, brought this action against Blair, as the accepter. Blair pleaded the general issue, and on the trial Pollock produced the bill of exchange, at the foot of which there was an

17. Gray v. Wells Copy cite
    16 Ky. 221 Court of Appeals of Kentucky April 18, 1816
    Not cited

    Opinion of the Court, by Judge Logan. Wells, who was the complainant in the court below, exhibited his bill in chancery, to coerce from the appellant the title at law to certain land, asserting the better right to the same under the following location, made

18. Hart v. Felder Copy cite
    4 S.C. Eq. 202 Court of Appeals of South Carolina June 15, 1811
    Not cited

    Chancellor James delivered the following decree : In the argument of this case the court suffered the gentlemen concerned, on both sides, to go into evidence as to some defects which they alleged to bo in certain judgments and executions under which they respectively

19. Jenkins v. Fickling Copy cite
    4 S.C. Eq. 369 Court of Appeals of South Carolina February 15, 1813
    Not cited

    There was no appeal from this decree.

20. Bulows v. Committee of O'Neall Copy cite
    4 S.C. Eq. 394 Court of Appeals of South Carolina February 15, 1813
    Not cited

    Afterwards-the subordinate points of the.case were brought on, upon the commissioner’s report, before chancellor Waties, who made the following decretal orders: Yariousexceptions have been made on.both sides to the report of the commissioner in this case. On

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.