TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law
510 cases · browse · 0.16 s
  1. Page v. Lloyd
    30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 304 Supreme Court January 1, 1831

    McLean, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. — This cause is certified from the eastern district of the-circuit court in Virginia, the judges of that court being divided in opinion. The legal question arose out of the following facts, which are substantially

  2. Boone v. Chiles
    35 U.S. (10 Pet.) 133 Supreme Court February 18, 1836

    35 U.S. 133 (____) 10 Pet. 133 *SARAH BOONE AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM CHILES AND OTHERS, APPELLEES. Supreme Court of United States. *140 The case was argued at January term 1835, by Mr. Clay for the appellants, and by Mr. Harding, for the appellees

  3. 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 102 Supreme Court February 16, 1837
    Cited by 162 Dissent · Story

    Mr. Justice Story, dissenting. The present case comes before the Court upon a certificate of division of opinion of the judges of the circuit court of the southern district of New York. Of course, according to the well known practice of this Court, and the mandates

  4. Jenkins v. Pye
    37 U.S. (12 Pet.) 241 Supreme Court February 22, 1838
    Cited by 50 Concurrence · Catron

    Mr. Justice Catron. I concur with the majority of the Court, that the decree be reversed ; but, differing most materially with the reasons and principles on which the opinion of my brethren proceeds, I will briefly state the difference, hoping sincerely I may

  5. 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 248 Supreme Court February 18, 1831

    Marshall, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court. — This is a writ of error to a judgment of the court of appeals of Kentucky, affirming a judgment of the Union county circuit court of that state. The plaintiff brought an ejectment in the Union county circuit

  6. 28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 99 Supreme Court February 18, 1830
    Cited by 141 Concurrence · Johnson

    Mr Justice Johnson. I concur in the opinion in favour of this devise; but this rs one of those cases in which I wish my. opinion to appear in my own. words. This cáse conies up on a certified difference of opinion on five points. I take them in their order on

  7. Shanks v. Dupont
    28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 242 Supreme Court February 18, 1830
    Cited by 62 Dissent · Johnson

    Mr Justice Johnson, dissenting. This cause comes up from the state court of South Carolina. *251 ■ The question is whether the plaintiffs can inherit to their mother. The objection to their inheriting is, that they are aliens, not born in allegiance to the

  8. 28 U.S. (3 Pet.) 433 Supreme Court February 18, 1830
    Cited by 522 Dissent · M'Lean

    Mr Justice M’Lean, dissenting. This cause was removed from the district court of Louisiana by a writ of error; and a reversal of the judgment is prayed for, on the errors assigned. The suit was originally brought in the parish court of the parish of New Orleans

  9. 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1 Supreme Court March 18, 1831

    Marshall, Ch. J., delivered the opinion of the court. — This bill is brought by the Cherokee nation, praying an injunction to restrain the state of Georgia from the execution of certain laws of that state, which, as is alleged, go directly to annihilate the Cherokee

  10. Smith v. Richards
    38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 26 Supreme Court February 18, 1839
    Cited by 106 Dissent · Baldwin

    Mr. Justice Baldwin dissented, both as to the facts, arid the law as stated in the opinion of the Court delivered by Mr. Justice Barbour. On appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the southern district of New York. This cause came on to be heard

  11. 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 89 Supreme Court February 20, 1839

    Mr. Justice Barbour delivered the opinion of the Court.— This case is brought before us by a writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the- District of Columbia, for the county of Washington. It was an action of assumpsit, brought by the defendants

  12. 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 519 Supreme Court March 18, 1839
    Cited by 511 Dissent · Kinley

    Mr. Justice M'Kinley delivered an opinion, dissenting from the judgment of the Court. I dissent from so much of the opinion of the majority of the Court as decides that the law of nations furnishes a rule by which validity can.be given to the contracts in these

  13. 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 233 Supreme Court February 14, 1831

    Story, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. — This case comes before the court by a writ of error to the circuit court for the district of Georgia. The original action was an ejectment, brought by the plaintiff in error, against the defendants ; and at

  14. Harris v. D'Wolf
    29 U.S. (4 Pet.) 147 Supreme Court March 16, 1830

    Mr Chief Justice Marshall delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a writ of error to a judgment of the court of the United States, for the first circuit and district of Massachusetts, in an action of replevin claiming the restitution of twenty-three cases

  15. Gilman v. Rives
    35 U.S. (10 Pet.) 227 Supreme Court February 24, 1836

    35 U.S. 227 (____) 10 Pet. 227 *BENJAMIN I. GILMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. PETER G. RIVES. Supreme Court of United States. The case is stated at large in the opinion of the court. Mr. Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the court. This is a writ

  16. 38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 176 Supreme Court February 20, 1839

    *178 Mr. Justice M'Lean delivered the opinion of the Court:— This case comes before this Court on a certificate of division of opinion of the judges of the Circuit Court, for the eastern district of Virginia. The defendant was indicted under the 45th section

  17. Stein v. Bowman
    38 U.S. (13 Pet.) 209 Supreme Court February 18, 1839

    Mr. Justice M‘Lean delivered the opinion of the' Court, — ' This case .was brought originally in the District Court of the Unitqd States for the eastern district of Louisiana; and on the trial certain exceptions, were taken to the ruling of the Court by the

  18. 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 351 Supreme Court February 16, 1837

    36 U.S. 351 (____) 11 Pet. 351 EDWARD LIVINGSTON'S EXECUTRIX, APPELLANT v. BENJAMIN STORY. Supreme Court of United States. *364 The case was argued by Mr. White for the appellant, and by Mr. Crittenden and Mr. Clay for the appellee. Mr. White for the

  19. Ellicott v. Pearl
    35 U.S. 412 Supreme Court January 15, 1836

    Mr Justice Story delivered the opinion of the court. This is a writ of error to the judgment of the circuit court for the district of Kentucky, upon a writ of right, sued forth on the 17th of January 1831; in which the plaintiffs in error were the demandants

  20. 34 U.S. (9 Pet.) 238 Supreme Court January 20, 1835

    34 U.S. 238 (____) 9 Pet. 238 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF v. JOHN BAILEY. Supreme Court of United States. *241 The case was argued by the Attorney-General, and Mr Loughborough, for the United States. No counsel appeared for the defendant. *251 Mr

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list