-
20 Jones & S. 287 The Superior Court of New York City June 19, 1885Not cited
By the Court.—Freedman, J. The action is based on a promissory note, dated October 30, 1882, and made and indorsed by the firm of George Palen & Co., and the complaint charges the defendants with having been the partners who composed that firm. The several answers
-
21 Jones & S. 448 The Superior Court of New York City July 2, 1886Not cited
By the Court. Sedgwioic, Ch. J. The action was upon the following instrument made by the defendant: “Hew York, Oct. 18, 1883. “Messrs. McCreery &Co., Gentlemen :—I will become responsible for $350 of Miss Flora Livingston’s bill of costumes, provided that
-
21 Jones & S. 431 The Superior Court of New York City July 2, 1886Not cited Concurrence · Gorman
O’Gorman, J. (Concurring).—This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered on a verdict by direction of the court below. The action was brought to recover damages for injuries to the person of the plaintiff, received while he was in the
-
22 Jones & S. 561 The Superior Court of New York City May 18, 1887Not cited
Order denying motion for new trial, and judgment affirmed, with costs.
-
22 Jones & S. 561 The Superior Court of New York City May 2, 1887Not cited
Per Curiam. Defendant’s exceptions should be overruled, and the plaintiff should have judgment on the verdict, with costs.
-
22 Jones & S. 563 The Superior Court of New York City June 23, 1887Not cited
Opinion Per Curiam. Order amended by-striking out words “ Twenty dollars costs,” and substituting in place thereof, words “ the costs awarded to the appellant on the appeal, and ten dollars the costs of the motion,” and as so modified order affirmed, without
-
22 Jones & S. 564 The Superior Court of New York City June 23, 1887Not cited
Orders affirmed.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 144 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by Hardin, J.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 144 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
— So much of the order appealed from as directs a reference reversed and the remainder of the order affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion by Bareer, J.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 144 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
— Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by Barker, J.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 145 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Smith, P. J.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 145 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to renew the motion.
-
18 Abb. N. Cas. 135 New York Supreme Court October 15, 1886Cited by 1 Concurrence · Brady
Brady, J. (concurring). The issue in this case was whether an agreement such as was stated by the witness Fish to have been made with the plaintiff, was in fact made, and it was submitted to the jury in an elaborate charge, to which no exception was taken by
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 146 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
Learned, P. J.: It is not necessary to consider the transaction on which the debts to Arnot arose. Because it is plain that they were valid debts, owing by the firm to him. Nor is it of any consequence that the mortgage was not recorded. The assignment by Beadle
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 205 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by Bockes, J. /,
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 205 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
— Judgment affirmed with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 205 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
Three appeals. All three orders reversed, with single costs of appeal and disbursements as in reversal of judgment on appeal, and proceedings on petition and answer remitted to Special Term for further action. Opinion by Bockes, J. Order to be settled! by Bockes
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 159 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
By the Court : The claim of the relator was presented to the canal auditors for damages alleged to have been caused by the officers of the State in opening the gates of an aqueduct to save the bants of the canal. It was one of the ordinary cases which by provision
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 206 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
— Judgment and order reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
-
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 181 New York Supreme Court January 15, 1883Not cited
Learned, P. J.: ■ It is not necessary to dispute the doctrine, that on a divorce, alimony may be decreed to the wife payable during her life. (Burr v. Burr, 10 Paige, 20 .) For the question is not as to the power of the court to make such a decree, but as to
Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.