1. New Jersey v. Anderson Copy cite
   203 U.S. 483 Supreme Court December 10, 1906 No. 49
   Cited by 273

   Mr. Justice Day, after making the- foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The provisions of the bankrupt law governing the payment of taxes are found in section 64a, act of 1898 ( 30 Stat. 563 , U. S. Comp. Stat. 1901, p. 3447), which reads

2. Pearcy v. Stranahan Copy cite
   205 U.S. 257 Supreme Court April 8, 1907 No. 1
   Cited by 17

   Mr. Chief Justice Fuller delivered the opinion of the court. ■ Plaintiff brought his' action in the Circuit Court of the United States for. the Southérn District of New York against the then collector of the port of New York to recover the value of certain cigars

3. Travers v. Reinhardt Copy cite
   205 U.S. 423 Supreme Court April 15, 1907 No. 76
   Cited by 83

   Mr. Justice Harlan delivered the opinion of the court. This suit was' originally brought for the partition or sale of *429 certain real estate in the city of Washington devised by .the will (and codicils thereto) of Nicholas Travers who died in the year 1849

4. Sauer v. City of New York Copy cite
   206 U.S. 536 Supreme Court May 27, 1907 No. 130
   Cited by 113 Dissent · McKenna

   Mb’. Justice McKenna, dissenting: J am unable to agree with the opinion -and judgment of the court. I think this case cannot be distinguished in principle from Muhlker v. Harlem Railroad Co., 197 U. S. 544 ; Burrell v. New York & Harlem Railroad Co. and Kierns

5. Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Copy cite
   207 U.S. 142 Supreme Court November 18, 1907 No. 22
   Cited by 236 Concurrence · Holmes

   Mb. Justice Holmes, concurring. Although I dp not dissent from the reasoning of the judgment, I prefer to rest, my agreement on the proposition that if the statute cannot operate as it purports to operate it does not operate at all. I do not think that it can

6. Patterson v. Colorado ex rel. Attorney General of Colo. Copy cite
   205 U.S. 454 Supreme Court April 15, 1907 No. 223
   Cited by 385 Dissent · Briowkr

   Mr. Justicio Briowkr, separately dissenting. "While not concurring in the views expressed by. Mr. justice. Harlan, I also dissent from the opinion and judgment of the court. -The plaintiff in error made a distinct" claim that he was denied that'which he asserted

7. Chanler v. Kelsey Copy cite
   205 U.S. 466 Supreme Court April 15, 1907 No. 240
   Cited by 97

   Mr. Justice Day, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The tax in controversy was imposed under an amendment of the general transfer-tax law of the State of New York, chapter 284, Laws of 1897, which provides as follows:.

8. Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co. Copy cite
   206 U.S. 230 Supreme Court May 13, 1907 Nos. 5, Original
   Cited by 202 Concurrence · Harlan

   MR. Justice Harlan, , concurring. ' The "State, of Georgia is, in my opinion, 'entitled to the general relief sought by'its bill, and, therefore, I concur-in the result. With some' things, however, contained' in the opinion, or to be implied from its language

9. United States v. Lynah Copy cite
   188 U.S. 445 Supreme Court February 23, 1903 No. 45
   Cited by 315 Overruled Dissent · White

   Me. Justice White, with whom concur Me. Chief Justice FulleR and Me. Justice Hablan, dissenting. The court now holds that it has jurisdiction, because as a *480 legal conclusion from the findings of fact it is-, held that the property of the appellee has

10. Pabst Brewing Co. v. Crenshaw Copy cite
    198 U.S. 17 Supreme Court April 17, 1905 No. 85
    Cited by 35

    Mr. Justice White delivered the opinion of the court. . The Pabst Brewing Company, a Wisconsin corporation, filed its bill in the court below to enjoin the beer inspector of the State of Missouri and his assistant from collecting or attempting to collect an

11. Hyde v. Shine Copy cite
    199 U.S. 62 Supreme Court May 29, 1905 No. 406
    Cited by 171 Dissent · Peckham

    Me. Justice Peckham, with whom concurred Me.'Justice White and Me. Justice McKenna, dissenting.' I dissent from the opinion 1 and judgment of the court in this case, and wish simply to state the grounds of my dissent without any attempt to do more. The indictment-avers

12. Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky Copy cite
    199 U.S. 194 Supreme Court November 13, 1905 No. 84
    Cited by 266 Dissent · Holmes

    Me. Justice Holmes: It seems to me that the result reached by the court probably is a desirable one, but I hardly understand-how it can be deduced from the Fourteenth Amendment, and as the Chief Justice feels the same difficulty, I think it' proper to say that

13. Hafemann v. Gross Copy cite
    199 U.S. 342 Supreme Court November 27, 1905 No. 64
    Cited by 16

    Mr. Justice Brewer, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The case turns upon the construction of the contract and its alleged conflict with section 2262, Rev. Stat., the pertinent part of which is' “Before any person claiming

14. Carroll v. Greenwich Ins. Co. of NY Copy cite
    199 U.S. 401 Supreme Court November 27, 1905 No. 50
    Cited by 74

    Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the court. This is a bill brought by a number of fire insurance companies, incorporated in States other than Iowa, to enjoin the auditor of that State from enforcing §§ 1754, 1755 and 1756 of the Iowa Code, 1897. The

15. Trono v. United States Copy cite
    199 U.S. 521 Supreme Court December 4, 1905 No. 34
    Cited by 116 Dissent · Harlan

    Mr. Justice- Harlan, dissenting. The plaintiffs in error were tried by one of the courts of first instance in the Philippine Islands for the crime of murder. The trial was before a single judge, without a jury, and simply upon a written complaint filed by an

16. Howard v. Kentucky Copy cite
    200 U.S. 164 Supreme Court January 2, 1906 No. 77
    Cited by 63

    Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error seeks to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, affirming a conviction and sentence of murder against him. He was indicted, with others, for

17. First Nat. Bank of Ottawa v. Converse Copy cite
    200 U.S. 425 Supreme Court February 19, 1906 No. 176
    Cited by 49 Dissent · Brewer

    *441 Mr. Justice Brewer, dissenting. I am unablé to concur in the opinion and judgment in this, case, and will briefly state the grounds of my dissent. There is nothing in the organization of a national bank that ’ puts it outside of the ordinary rules governing

18. United States v. Martinez Copy cite
    195 U.S. 469 Supreme Court December 12, 1904 No. 15
    Cited by 18

    Me. Justice Day, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. This claim arises under the Indian Depredation Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 851 , and presents the question whether, after the expiration of three years from the filing

19. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Copy cite
    195 U.S. 540 Supreme Court December 12, 1904 Nos. 89, 199
    Cited by 135 Dissent · Harlan

    Mr. Justice Harlan, dissenting. In view of the importance of these cases I do not feel that any dissent from the opinion and judgment of the court should be expressed, unless the grounds of such dissent be fully disclosed. The controlling question before the

20. Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining Company Copy cite
    196 U.S. 239 Supreme Court January 16, 1905 No. 362
    Cited by 260 Dissent · Holmes

    Mr. Justice Holmes, dissenting. I regret that I am unable to agree with the decision of the court. The question on which I differ is whether a proceeding for the taking of land by eminent domain, authorized by the State of Kentucky to be begun in the Courts

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.