1. Cruger v. Dockstader Copy cite
   31 Misc. 24 City of New York Municipal Court March 15, 1900
   Not cited

   OoMLAir, J. This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict directed by the court. The action was brought to recover a certain sum as compensation for services, and the principal defense relied upon by the defendant was the Statute of Limitations. It

2. Sweeny v. Union Railway Co. Copy cite
   31 Misc. 797 City of New York Municipal Court March 15, 1900
   Not cited

   Conlan, J. It is conceded that the plaintiff attempted to board an open car of the defendant, and in so doing had a fall and received injuries, but it is disputed that such accident was occasioned by the defendant’s negligence. The car was stationary and it is

3. Boston Manufacturer's Mutual Fire Insurance v. Hendricks Copy cite
   41 Misc. 479 New York Supreme Court October 15, 1903
   Cited by 2

   Herrick, J. That the State has the power to regulate the business of insurance, to say who shall be permitted to carry on such business within the State, and the terms and condition upon which it may be so carried on, and to tax the business of a foreign corporation

4. People ex rel. Forster v. Warden of Kings County Penitentiary Copy cite
   39 Misc. 700 New York Supreme Court February 15, 1903
   Cited by 6

   Gaynor, J.: The relator was tried and convicted hy a city magistrate in the borough of Brooklyn, and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of six months in the Kings county penitentiary. She seeks to be released by writs of habeas corpus and certiorari. The complaint

5. People ex rel. Goetz Silk Manufacturing Co. v. Wells Copy cite
   42 Misc. 86 New York Supreme Court December 15, 1903
   Cited by 1

   Gildeesleeve, J. This is a proceeding to review upon a writ of certiorari the action of the commissioners of taxes and assessments of the city of Hew York in assessing the relator, a foreign corporation with an office in this city, in the sum of $10,000 for the

6. In re Haase Copy cite
   41 Misc. 114 New York Supreme Court June 15, 1903
   Not cited

   Forbes, J. This is a proceeding, under section 2471a, of the Code of Civil Procedure, for an order directing Seymour Lowman to turn over to Henry J. Haase, as the chamberlain of the city of Elmira, the books, papers, etc., belonging to said office. The facts

7. In re City of New York Copy cite
   41 Misc. 134 New York Supreme Court June 15, 1903
   Cited by 1

   Leventritt, J. This is an application to annul and vacate certain proceedings had by the city of Hew York through its flock commissioner for the acquisition of such rights in the pier known as Old Ho. 24 as were in owners other than itself. The proceedings had

8. People v. Manhattan Fire Insurance Copy cite
   41 Misc. 611 New York Supreme Court November 15, 1903
   Cited by 1

   Herrick, J. My denial of the motion of the receiver for an order authorizing and empowering him to pay the money mentioned in his notice of motion, and the granting of an order authorizing the transfer of the sum of two thousand dollars ($2,000), from his general

9. Rhoades v. Schwartz Copy cite
   41 Misc. 648 New York Supreme Court November 15, 1903
   Not cited

   Scott, J. This action is brought to enforce specifically an alleged agreement on the part of one Elise Schmid, now *649 deceased, to devise certain real estate in a particular way. It is alleged that said Elise Schmid was from 1878 to the time'of-her death in

10. In re the Final Accounting of Oakley Copy cite
    41 Misc. 652 New York Supreme Court November 15, 1903
    Not cited

    Scott, J. This is an application by the assignee for the benefit of creditors to sustain his exceptions to the report of the referee taking and stating his account, to modify the said report in accordance with said exceptions and to confirm the same as so modified

11. People ex rel. New York Mutual Gas Light Co. v. Wells Copy cite
    42 Misc. 606 New York Supreme Court February 15, 1904
    Not cited

    Scott, J. In my opinion this proceeding cannot he distinguished from People ex rel. Consolidated Gas Co. v. Feitner, 78 App. Div. 313 . In this case, as in that, the commissioners were presented with a sworn statement of the assets and liabilities of the relator

12. City of New York v. Third Avenue Railroad Copy cite
    42 Misc. 599 New York Supreme Court February 15, 1904
    Cited by 2

    Greenbaum, J. This action is brought to recover the sum of $25,720, with interest, claimed to be due for car license fees from defendant for the years 1894 to 1899 inclusive. The conceded facts are that the plaintiff is a municipal corporation which succeeded

13. Cullinan v. Kisselbrack Copy cite
    43 Misc. 103 New York Supreme Court March 15, 1904
    Cited by 2

    Cochrane, J. This is an action on a bond, given under the provisions of the Liquor. Tax Law, for alleged violations of such law on the part of the defendant Kisselbrack, who was a hotel-keeper at Ancram, N. Y. Evidence was given *104 on- the trial tending to

14. Heidlinger v. Onward Construction Co. Copy cite
    44 Misc. 555 New York Supreme Court August 15, 1904
    Cited by 3

    Herrick, J. This case turns upon the sufficiency and effect of an-architect’s certificate and the'circumstances under which it was given. “It is now too well settled in this State to he questioned that where the parties have selected an arbitrator, who is to-determine

15. People ex rel. Ungrich v. Crain Copy cite
    47 Misc. 281 New York Supreme Court May 15, 1905
    Cited by 1

    Leventritt, J. This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the respondent to approve the relators’ plan for a tenement-house. The plan has been rejected on the ground that it fails to show compliance with section 56 of the Tenement-House

16. In re Saunders Copy cite
    2 Liquor Tax Rep. 262 New York Supreme Court March 15, 1900
    Not cited

    Hash, J.: There was no building occupied as a dwelling within two hundred feet of the nearest entrance to Garnsey’s premises at the time the certificate was obtained. There was a building in the course of construction within that distance, but it was not and

17. People ex rel. Greene v. Grout Copy cite
    3 Liquor Tax Rep. 294 New York Supreme Court February 24, 1904
    Not cited

    Leventritt, J.: The decision of Mr. Justice Greenbaum in People ex rel. McLennon v. Grout ( 38 Misc. 181 ), with which I find myself in accord, covers all the points made on this application except so far as the nature of the police officer’s act is concerned

18. Adams v. Old Dominion Steamship Co. Copy cite
    32 Misc. 758 City of New York Municipal Court July 15, 1900
    Not cited

    Hascall, J. We think that the case was properly tried and determined upon the merits below, and that the ^appellant’s exceptions do not call for reversal. Judgment and order denying "motion for new trial affirmed, with costs and disbursements to respondent.-

19. Ward v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. Copy cite
    32 Misc. 759 City of New York Municipal Court July 15, 1900
    Not cited

    Hascall, J. No sufficient reason is shown for disturbing the findings and conclusions below. Judgment and order appealed from affirmed, with costs. Conlan and Schuchman, JJ., concur. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

20. Goldberg v. Gelles Copy cite
    33 Misc. 797 City of New York Municipal Court January 15, 1901
    Cited by 1

    Conlan, J. The action was to recover the commissions of a broker in finding a customer for the purchase of certain premises which the defendant had for sale in New York city. It appears that the defendant engaged the plaintiff to find him a purchaser for the

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.