1. Ferrand v. Ferrand Copy cite
   135 Misc. 540 New York Supreme Court June 24, 1929
   Not cited

   Dike, J. The plaintiff, the alleged wife, bases her claim upon an alleged common-law marriage that in the complaint she alleges began upon the 23d day of August, 1928, when, as she sets forth, the plaintiff and defendant agreed mutually to become husband and

2. Gibson v. Gillespie Copy cite
   138 A. 600 Superior Court of Delaware June 1, 1927 No. 218
   Cited by 2

   Pennewill, C. J., delivering the opinion of the Court: This is a motion to amend a sheriff’s return in accordance with the facts: Under a writ of foreign attachment issued in the above stated case September 3, 1926, the sheriff of this county attached all the

3. Hare & Chase, of Wilmington, Inc. v. Hutchison Copy cite
   138 A. 611 Superior Court of Delaware July 15, 1927 No. 142
   Cited by 2

   Rodney, J., delivering the opinion of the court: This case is largely controlled by Continental Guaranty Corporation v. People's Bus Line, 1 W. W. Harr. (31 Del.) 595, 117 A. 275 . The defendant, however, concludes that the express language of the agreement

4. In re Estate of Lamoureux Copy cite
   1 Cal. Super. Ct. 101 California Superior Court February 15, 1922
   Not cited

   In the Superior Court of the State of California In and for the County of Alameda. Decision No. 27577. Dept. No. 4, In the matter of the estate of Artel Lamoureux, deceased. This matter comes before the Court on petition of the widow of the deceased to have

5. Cook v. Coulter Copy cite
   11 Pa. D. & C. 527 Washington County Court of Common Pleas April 30, 1928 No. 28
   Not cited

   Brownson, P. J., D. J. Coulter, having acquired three leaseholds for oil and gas purposes (one of which was known as the Hudson Tucker lease), sold and assigned undivided “working interests” therein to a number of persons, who are named in the insurance policy

6. Mandeville v. Mandeville Copy cite
   11 Pa. D. & C. 181 Wayne County Court of Common Pleas April 16, 1928 No. 380
   Not cited

   Searle, P. J., This matter is a rule to strike off appeal from award of arbitrators because of the failure of appellant to pay all costs at the time of appeal. The case was assumpsit and was so proceeded with that arbitrators were chosen on a rule entered by

7. Ex parte Burns Copy cite
   4 Balt. C. Rep. 530 Baltimore City Court January 4, 1927
   Not cited

   O’DUNNE, J. Friday, December 31, after conviction of respondent the preceding day, of contempt of Court in giving interview on pending case of Sammons and Neimoth, charged with robbery, of $47,-000 of the Sonneborn payroll, the respondent, through his counsel

8. A. J. Watkins Realty Corp. v. Brotman Copy cite
   4 Balt. C. Rep. 542 Baltimore City Circuit Court January 11, 1927
   Not cited

   STEIN, J. This bill was filed to obtain an injunction prohibiting the corporate defendant from erecting an advertising sign on seven lots of ground in the city on Reisterstown road, sold by the plaintiff to the defendants Brotman *543 and wife, who leased them

9. State v. Rasin Copy cite
   4 Balt. C. Rep. 549 Baltimore City Court January 20, 1927
   Not cited

   O’DUNNE, J. You have been most ably represented by skilled counsel of large experience. You had the benefit before the jury, not only the defense actually interposed, but also one artfully suggested by insinuation and outlined in an opening statement of your

10. Oak Lane Country Day School v. Virginia Fire & Marine Insurance Copy cite
    8 Pa. D. & C. 194 Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas February 1, 1926 No. 28
    Not cited

    Williams, J., The pleadings in this case differ from those filed in the action of the Oak Lane Country Day School, the plaintiff, against the Fidelity-Phenix Fire Insurance Company, of New York, brought to No. 26, February Term, 1925, only in the unimportant

11. Veech v. Trustees of Trinity Episcopal Church Copy cite
    3 Pa. D. & C. 395 Fayette County Court December 21, 1922 No. 604
    Cited by 1

    Van Swearingen, P. J., The land described in the praecipe and writ of ejectment consists of a rectangular lot, fronting 75 feet on Ash-man Avenue and extending back at right angles thereto a distance of 120 feet to an alley, on which is erected a building known

12. Westside Electric Street Ry. Co. v. West Penn Power Co. Copy cite
    8 Pa. D. & C. 281 Washington County Court of Common Pleas February 1, 1926 No. 3037
    Not cited

    Opinion on exceptions to the court’s adjudication. Cummins, J., Plaintiff by bill seeks to restrain defendant company from crossing, with a system of high-tension lines, its tracks and facilities at a height of at least 145 feet above and without touching

13. Genkinger v. Porter Copy cite
    8 Pa. D. & C. 338 Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas April 5, 1926 No. 31
    Not cited

    Hildebrand, P. J., This matter is before the court upon a writ of alternative mandamus on petition of Louis G. Genkinger, issued upon *339 A. L. Porter, City Controller, and W. T. Burns, Superintendent of the Department of Accounts and Finance, to compel them

14. Parson v. Downer Copy cite
    9 Pa. D. & C. 246 Washington County Court of Common Pleas August 23, 1926 No. 325
    Not cited

    Brownson, P. J., The sole questions of law which the statutory demurrer purports definitely to raise are whether, after the bringing into court, upon an appeal taken by the defendant, of an action of trespass commenced before a justice of the peace, the plaintiff

15. Knipper v. B. & L. E. Traction Co. Copy cite
    9 Pa. D. & C. 235 Erie County Court Common Pleas April 6, 1926 No. 307
    Not cited

    Rossiter, P. J. This is a rule to strike off judgments entered upon verdicts by the prothonotary. The suit in which the verdicts were obtained was an action of trespass for damages. The case was tried before Judge Criswell and a jury. The jury rendered a verdict

16. Gallonia v. Ciallelia Copy cite
    9 Pa. D. & C. 13 Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas October 11, 1926 No. 134
    Not cited

    Hildebrand, P. J., Judgment by confession was entered Jan. 28, 1924. Defendant presented, his petition to open judgment and the prayer of his petition was granted Jan. 5, 1925. On Aug. 2, 1926, plaintiff presented his petition for the awarding of an issue. On

17. Buettner v. City of Washington Copy cite
    9 Pa. D. & C. 225 Washington County Court of Common Pleas May 3, 1926 No. 52
    Not cited

    Brownson, P. J. Attention is called in the defendant’s brief to the fact (although this fact is not set up in the motion as a ground thereof) that the notice prescribed in section 1 of Court Rule 31 was not given prior to the presentation of the petition for

18. Commonwealth v. Day Copy cite
    3 Pa. D. & C. 749 Washington County Court of Common Pleas April 30, 1923 No. 226
    Not cited

    Brownson, P. J., On Dec. 26, 1922, William Shriver made a complaint before Boyd C. Parshall, justice of the peace, setting forth that S. L. Day had permitted his sheep to trespass upon the lands of the complainant, contrary to the Act of March 4, 1763, 1 Sm.

19. Neil v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co. Copy cite
    3 Pa. D. & C. 811 Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas March 19, 1923 No. 84
    Not cited

    Miller, J., Both the referee and the Workmen’s Compensation Board having disallowed compensation to the claimant, she, on Oct. 11, 1922, filed with the prothonotary her notice of appeal to this court and, two days later, her exceptions to “findings, conclusions

20. Lynch v. Blaker Copy cite
    3 Pa. D. & C. 800 Greene County Court of Common Pleas April 23, 1923 No. 47
    Not cited

    Ray, P. J., This is a proceeding by scire facias, at No. 47, June Term, 1921, of this court, to revive and continue the lien of a judgment *801 entered to No. 142, June Term, 1916. The defendant, June 25, 1921, filed an affidavit of defence, wherein, for several

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.