1. Claim of Brooks v. Kole-Millspaugh, Inc. Copy cite
   238 A.D. 754 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York January 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.

2. Economy Holding Corp. v. City of New York Copy cite
   239 A.D. 887 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days from service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Glennon, JJ.; Finch, P. J.,

3. Valentine v. Cavanaugh Copy cite
   238 A.D. 800 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York February 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Order consolidating actions affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, CarsweE, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

4. Payne v. Emery Copy cite
   238 A.D. 756 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York January 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.

5. Nelson v. Long Copy cite
   239 A.D. 821 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York May 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ.

6. People v. Minkus Copy cite
   239 A.D. 854 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York May 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Nassau county unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ.

7. In re Van Valkenburg Copy cite
   239 A.D. 877 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York May 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Judgment affirmed. All concur except Sears, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the proceeding in a memorandum, by Taylor, J.

8. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Saranac River Power Corp. Copy cite
   239 A.D. 873 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York May 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Order affirmed, on the ground that this court will not assume to direct the action of the-Special Term as to the matters it deems proper to refer. By the affirmance of the order removing the receiver herein this court did'not pass upon the propriety of any expenditures

9. Graham v. Straus Copy cite
   239 A.D. 891 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1933
   Not cited

   Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ.

10. Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Federal Electric Co. Copy cite
    239 A.D. 911 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1933 No. 2
    Not cited

    — Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—-Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.; McAvoy, J. taking no part.

11. Reif v. New York Life Insurance Copy cite
    239 A.D. 890 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1933
    Not cited Dissent · Martin

    Martin, J. (dissenting). The defenses are sufficient. The only grounds urged for striking out same are those' stated in rule 103, Rules of Civil Practice. They are neither redundant nor sham. Each defense succinctly states additional allegations necessary for

12. Cohen v. Brockway Motor Truck Corp. Copy cite
    240 A.D. 18 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York January 19, 1934
    Cited by 8

    Glennon, J. Defendant, Brockway Motor Truck Corporation, is a manufacturer of trucks. It sold one of its trucks to Jacob *19 Cohen, the employer of plaintiff Shirley Cohen. "While Shirley Cohen was on the truck, one of the door handles “ gave way and broke,

13. Gerard v. Bank of New York & Trust Co. Copy cite
    240 A.D. 531 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York April 6, 1934
    Cited by 3

    Townley, J. This action was brought to recover $2,861.16, the difference between the amount claimed by plaintiff to be due and the amount paid by the defendant on a “ Trust of Accumulation.” The agreement involved reads as follows: *533 “ Trust of Accumulation

14. Arnold v. Goldman Copy cite
    240 A.D. 711 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1933
    Not cited

    Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present—Lazansky, P. J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

15. Davison v. Jahnke Copy cite
    240 A.D. 711 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York June 15, 1933
    Not cited

    On argument, and on consent of respondent in open court, order, in so far as it denies plaintiff’s motion to fix the referee’s fees at twenty-five dollars and fixes the fees at one hundred dollars, reversed and motion granted to the extent of fixing the fees at

16. Surprise Building Co. v. Rosenblatt Copy cite
    240 A.D. 424 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York March 16, 1934
    Not cited

    Townley, J. This suit is brought by a landlord against a tenant to recover the amount of certain taxes which accrued during the term but on which payment had not come due until after the termination of the tenancy by a summary proceeding. On April 30, 1919,

17. Murray Realty Co. v. Regal Shoe Co. Copy cite
    240 A.D. 462 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York March 21, 1934
    Cited by 1

    Taylor, J. Real property was leased by plaintiff, appellant, to Truly Warner, Inc., and the latter assigned the lease to Truly Warner Co., Inc. A portion of the premises had been sublet by the first lessee to defendant, respondent. The overlease contains certain

18. In re Queens County Bar Ass'n Copy cite
    256 A.D. 944 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York February 28, 1939
    Not cited

    The proof tends to indicate that prior to 1934 respondents had solicited retainers in condemnation proceedings by paid agents. Because of the existence at that time of an erroneous impression in some places that the prohibition against solicitation was not applicable

19. Glicman v. Barker Painting Co. Copy cite
    227 A.D. 585 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York January 10, 1930
    Cited by 10

    McAvoy, J. The Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paper Hangers, a national labor union, has a provision in its constitution known as section 132, which prescribes that its general executive board shall not be invested with power to force an employer to

20. Wrighter v. A. A. Adams Stores, Inc. Copy cite
    232 A.D. 351 Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York May 13, 1931
    Cited by 4

    Van Kirk, P. J. The action is to recover damages for personal injuries. The fronts of two stores, or a double store, were to be *352 repaired. These premises were upon one of the streets in the city of Binghamton. To do this work it was necessary that a space

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.