1. Town of Hingham v. Slater Copy cite
   98 F. Supp. 2d 131 D. Massachusetts May 30, 2000 No. Civ.A. 96-11650-RCL
   Not cited

   ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LINDSAY, District Judge. Before the court are cross motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff (docket no. 109) and the defendants (docket nos. 122 and 129). These motions were referred to Chief Magistrate

2. Amwest Surety Insurance v. Vaughn Copy cite
   100 F. Supp. 2d 335 E.D. North Carolina February 14, 2000 No. 5:98-cv-00148
   Cited by 2

   ORDER TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Defendants’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents. For the reasons discussed

3. Norton v. Hoyt Copy cite
   278 F. Supp. 2d 214 D. Rhode Island August 13, 2003 No. 01-0156L
   Cited by 5

   OPINION AND ORDER LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The disputed claims arise out of an adulterous twenty-three year relationship between Plaintiff and Defendant

4. United States v. Jacques Copy cite
   434 F. Supp. 2d 14 D. Maine June 9, 2006 No. CR-05-87-B-W
   Cited by 2

   PRESENTENCE ORDER WOODCOCK, District Judge. Having pleaded guilty to importation of oxycodone and assaulting a federal officer, David Ryan Jacques challenges the Probation Office’s decision to group the counts of conviction for purposes of calculating his sentencing

5. United States v. Sotomayor Copy cite
   222 F. Supp. 2d 142 D. Puerto Rico September 16, 2002 No. Crim 99-139 (DRD)
   Cited by 1

   *143 OPINION AND ORDER DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Defendant has filed a Supplemental Motion to it’s request of acquittal under Fed. R.Crim. P. 29(c). Docket No. 155. Defendant was convicted of intentionally killing a local, drug-enforcement, undercover officer

6. Smith v. Nelson Copy cite
   86 F. Supp. 2d 787 N.D. Ohio March 2, 2000 No. 4:00CV108
   Cited by 2

   MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ECONOMUS, District Judge. On December 9, 1999, the Plaintiffs filed the above-captioned action in the Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, Mahon-ing County seeking declaratory judgment and other legal and equitable relief. 1

7. Walker v. Woodford Copy cite
   593 F. Supp. 2d 1140 S.D. California August 28, 2008 No. 05cv1705-LAB (NLS)
   Not cited

   ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged Constitutional violations. Following dismissal

8. Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Castworld Products, Inc. Copy cite
   219 F.R.D. 494 C.D. California December 31, 2003 No. CV 03-4045-GAF
   Cited by 434

   ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT and PERMANENT INJUNCTION FEESS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On June 9, 2003, Plaintiff filed this action against Defendant Castworld Products Inc. (“Defendant”), after Defendant was identified by the United States

9. United States ex rel. Bagley v. TRW, Inc. Copy cite
   204 F.R.D. 170 C.D. California October 25, 2001 No. CV95-4153-AHM(AJWX)
   Cited by 11

   MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER WISTRICH, United States Magistrate Judge. Introduction Before the court is defendant TRW, Inc.’s motion for a protective order regarding 29 inadvertently produced privileged documents

10. On the House Syndication, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp. Copy cite
    203 F.R.D. 452 S.D. California July 9, 2001 No. Civ. No. 99-CV-1336 B(JFS)
    Cited by 12

    ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY AND TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FROM CLASS MEMBERS STIVEN, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On June 8, 2001, Defendant Federal Express Corp. (“FedEx”) submitted an ex parte application

11. Choate v. United States Copy cite
    218 F.R.D. 677 S.D. California September 2, 2003 No. 03-CV-0838K (JAH)
    Cited by 2

    ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS KEEP, District Judge. On July 30, 2003, Defendant filed the instant motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter under FRCP 12(b)(1) and for insufficiency of service of process under FRCP 12

12. County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp. Copy cite
    517 F. Supp. 2d 662 S.D. New York September 20, 2007 Nos. Master File No. 1:00-1898; MDL No. 1358 (SAS); No. M21-88
    Cited by 1

    OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Methyl tertiary butyl ether (“MTBE”) is a chemical compound that companies be *664 gan adding to gasoline in 1979. 1 “While the use of MTBE as a fuel additive in gasoline has helped to

13. Standifer v. Sonic-Williams Motors, LLC Copy cite
    401 F. Supp. 2d 1205 N.D. Alabama November 8, 2005 No. 2:04-cv-2359
    Cited by 5

    MEMORANDUM OF DECISION HANCOCK, Senior District Judge. The court has before it the September 15, 2005 motion (doc. # 32) of defendant Sonic Williams Motors, LLC d/b/a Tom Williams Lexus for summary judgment. Pursuant to the court’s September 16, 2005 and October

14. Frontera v. City of Columbus Copy cite
    619 F. Supp. 2d 493 S.D. Ohio December 23, 2008 No. C2-06-1046
    Cited by 1

    OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. Plaintiff, Mark E. Frontera, is a current

15. Toledo Electrical Welfare Fund v. Northwest Ohio Buckeye Electric, Ltd. Copy cite
    518 F. Supp. 2d 1001 N.D. Ohio October 30, 2007 No. 3:04 CV 7722
    Cited by 2

    MEMORANDUM OPINION KATZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the third party defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 122). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . I. Background This dispute arises from a collective bargaining

16. Zak v. Kenney Copy cite
    197 F.R.D. 212 D. Connecticut October 18, 2000 No. Civ.A. 3:97 CV 1525 (SRU)
    Cited by 1

    ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS UNDERHILL, District Judge. On July 12, 2000, the court issued an oral order to show cause requiring Terrence M. O’Neill, counsel for defendant, to show cause why the defendant should not be defaulted for repeated failures to comply

17. Hildebrand v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Copy cite
    194 F.R.D. 432 D. Connecticut April 10, 2000 No. 3:98 CV 2520(JGM)
    Cited by 4

    RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge. On November 11, 1998, plaintiffs Fayne A. Hildebrand and her husband, Andrew Hildebrand, commenced this lawsuit against defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in Connecticut Superior

18. Parker v. Della Rocco Copy cite
    197 F.R.D. 214 D. Connecticut October 27, 2000 No. 3:98CV00004 (JBA)
    Not cited

    RULING ON MOTION TO REOPEN [Doc. #20] ARTERTON, District Judge. Background This action was originally filed in the Superior Court for the Judicial District of New Haven in 1997 and was removed to federal court by the United States Department of Housing and

19. Powell v. American Red Cross Copy cite
    518 F. Supp. 2d 24 D.D.C. June 13, 2007 No. 06-4173 (ESH)
    Cited by 18

    MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge. Plaintiff Tonia Powell has sued her former employer, the American Red Cross (“defendant” or the “Red Cross”), asserting claims for violations of D.C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401 et

20. Rotshteyn v. Massanari Copy cite
    158 F. Supp. 2d 525 E.D. Pennsylvania May 31, 2001 No. 2:00-cv-03942
    Cited by 2

    MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MELINSON, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. This action was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (c)(3), which incorporates 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.