1. Pearson v. CITY OF BIG LAKE, MINN. Copy cite
   689 F. Supp. 2d 1163 D. Minnesota February 25, 2010 No. Civil 08-1370 (JRT/FLN)
   Not cited

   MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. Plaintiffs Todd Pearson, Mark Pearson, and Andrew Rick (collectively, “plaintiffs”), were officers in the City of Big

2. Hall v. Sunjoy Industries Group, Inc. Copy cite
   764 F. Supp. 2d 1297 M.D. Florida February 18, 2011 No. 6:09-cv-02032
   Cited by 51

   ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant Sunjoy Industries Group, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 34), Defendants’ Dispositive Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 37), Plaintiffs’ Motion to Establish

3. Oliver v. Hines Copy cite
   965 F. Supp. 2d 708 E.D. Virginia May 21, 2013 No. 1:12CV1032
   Not cited

   FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge. In this removed diversity action, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the July 23, 2008 amended inter vivos trust (hereinafter the “2008 Amended Trust” 1 ) of her father, Colonel

4. L-3 Communications Corp. v. Sony Corp. Copy cite
   971 F. Supp. 2d 437 D. Delaware September 19, 2013 No. 10-734-RGA
   Not cited

   MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREWS, United States District Judge: This is a summary judgment opinion. Plaintiff L-3 Communications Corporation asserts claim 15 of United States Patent No. 5,541,654 (“the '654 Patent”) against Defendants Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics

5. Eason v. Frye Copy cite
   972 F. Supp. 2d 935 S.D. Mississippi September 18, 2013 No. 1:12cv241-JMR
   Cited by 4

   MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN M. ROPER, SR., United States Chief Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of the Defendants, Melvin Brisolara [Brisolara] and Officer Jeffrey Frye # 280(K-9) [Frye] for summary judgment [43] filed in this case

6. Encompass Office Solutions, Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc. Copy cite
   775 F. Supp. 2d 938 E.D. Texas March 31, 2011 No. 6:10-cv-00096
   Cited by 44

   ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge. Before the court is the “Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and

7. Baburam v. Federal Express Corp. Copy cite
   318 F.R.D. 5 E.D. New York July 15, 2016 No. 15-CV-5122 (FB)
   Cited by 19

   MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Currently pending before this Court is a motion filed by plaintiff Heerarem Baburam (“plaintiff’), on June 27, 2016, to reopen fact discovery, which closed on June 8, 2016. See Letter

8. Dorchester Financial Holdings Corp. v. Banco BRJ S.A. Copy cite
   304 F.R.D. 178 S.D. New York December 15, 2014 No. 11-CV-1529 (KMW)
   Cited by 26

   OPINION & ORDER KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge: In his September 12, 2014 Memorandum and Order (the “Memorandum and Order” or “M & O”), Magistrate Judge Fox made two discovery-related determinations to which Plaintiff Dorchester Financial Holdings Cor-poi’ation

9. Liyan He v. Cigna Life Insurance Copy cite
   304 F.R.D. 186 S.D. New York January 20, 2015 No. 14 Civ. 2180(AT)(GWG)
   Cited by 10

   MEMORANDUM OPINION GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Liyan He brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), seeking long-term disability benefits under a plan administered

10. Biberaj v. Pritchard Industries, Inc. Copy cite
    859 F. Supp. 2d 549 S.D. New York March 12, 2012 No. 08 Civ. 07993 (PGG)
    Cited by 56

    MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Duljia Biberaj was formerly employed by Pritchard Industries, Inc. (“Pritchard”) as an office cleaner, and is a former member of Local 32BJ of the Service Employees International

11. Trident Products & Services, LLC v. Canadian Soiless Wholesale, Ltd. Copy cite
    859 F. Supp. 2d 771 E.D. Virginia April 18, 2012 No. 3:10-CV-00877
    Cited by 21

    MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN A. GIBNEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of 'Civil Procedure 56(a). The plaintiff, Trident Products and Services, LLC (“Trident”) asserts

12. Gardiner v. St. Croix District Governing Board of Directors Copy cite
    859 F. Supp. 2d 728 Virgin Islands March 30, 2012 No. 2012-027
    Cited by 13

    MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion to Remand to State Court, (Dkt. No. 2), filed on March 18,-2012. A hearing was held on March 22, 2012. For the reasons that follow, the Court will

13. Mumpuku v. City of Plano Copy cite
    E.D. Texas December 2, 2019 No. 4:18-cv-00785
    Not cited

    United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION HADRIAN MUMPUKU, § Plaintiff, § § Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00785 v. § Judge Mazzant § BRAD NEAL, § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is

14. United States v. Lott Copy cite
    859 F. Supp. 2d 1276 M.D. Florida October 27, 2011 No. 3:06-cr-63-J-25TEM
    Not cited

    ORDER HENRY LEE ADAMS, JR., District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation dated June 14, 2011 (Dkt.-84) recommending that Defendant’s pro se Motion to Compel the Government to file a Rule 35(b) motion (Dkt. 81), and Motion

15. Yates v. Commercial Index Bureau, Inc. Copy cite
    861 F. Supp. 2d 546 E.D. Pennsylvania April 24, 2012 No. 11-7488
    Cited by 4

    MEMORANDUM ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge. Plaintiffs Stanley E. Yates, Jr. and Denyse Yates bring suit against Defendants Commercial Index Bureau, Inc. (“CIB”), Rockne F. Cooke, Gordon W. Rusinko, 1 and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“AMTRAK”),

16. HDSherer LLC v. Natural Molecular Testing Corp. Copy cite
    292 F.R.D. 305 D. South Carolina July 31, 2013 No. 2:13-cv-561-PMD
    Cited by 44

    ORDER PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Natural Molecular Testing Corporation’s (“Defendant” or “NMTC”) Motion for a Protective Order and to Quash Subpoenas (“Motion”). The parties have fully briefed the

17. O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. Copy cite
    201 F. Supp. 3d 1110 N.D. California August 18, 2016 Nos. 13-cv-03826-EMC, Case No. 15-cv-00262-EMC
    Cited by 134

    ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL O’Connor, Docket No. 518 Yucesoy, Docket No. 206 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I- INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs brought the instant class action and putative class action against Defendant

18. A.J. California Mini Bus, Inc. v. Airport Commission Copy cite
    148 F. Supp. 3d 904 N.D. California December 3, 2015 No. 3:15-cv-03218-LB
    Cited by 3

    ORDER GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge Introduction San Francisco International Airport (“SFO”) uses a zone system (essentially, dedicated areas) that shared-ride van services

19. Perez v. Monster Inc. Copy cite
    149 F. Supp. 3d 1176 N.D. California January 20, 2016 No. 15-cv-03885-EMC
    Cited by 5

    ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Benjamin Perez has filed a putative class action against Defendants Monster ínc. and two Best Buy entities (Best Buy Stores, LP and

20. Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art Copy cite
    862 F. Supp. 2d 1044 C.D. California March 22, 2012 Nos. CV 07-2866-JFW (JTLx); Docket No. 76
    Not cited

    PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge. On December 27, 2011, Defendants Norton Simon Museum of

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.