-
Supreme Court of Alabama December 12, 2025 No. SC-2025-0368Not cited
McNutt, 323 So. 3d 1051 (Miss. 2021), a plaintiff sued a doctor, alleging medical negligence. The plaintiff also sued the hospital that employed him, asserting that it was vicariously liable for the doctor's negligence.
Bayhospitalists, LLC, 208 A.3d 720, 728-29 (Del. 2019), a case similar to the one now before us, a patient's daughter, as the personal representative of the patient's estate, brought a medical-negligence action against the doctors
Heights Chiropractic Physicians, L.L.C., 170 Ohio St. 3d 451 , 214 N.E.3d 540 (2022), the plaintiff sued a doctor, alleging medical negligence.
-
Supreme Court of Alabama February 24, 2023 No. 2022-0641Not cited
As a proximate result of the aforesaid negligence, the physicians and other healthcare providers attending Mr.
-
Supreme Court of Alabama March 7, 2025 No. SC-2024-0174Not cited
[Pates] believes that it would be highly prejudicial to her and a miscarriage of justice to time bar a woman who lost her leg to negligence of the doctor and the facilities he used to treat her, when there are facts that support
-
Supreme Court of Alabama March 7, 2025 No. SC-2024-0184Not cited
[Pates] believes that it would be highly prejudicial to her and a miscarriage of justice to time bar a woman who lost her leg to negligence of the doctor and the facilities he used to treat her, when there are facts that support
-
Supreme Court of Alabama December 22, 2022 No. 1210334Not cited
Bowling had negligently misinterpreted her CT scan and that, if not for his negligence, her seizure could have been prevented. She also sued the two physicians' groups for which Dr.
-
Supreme Court of Alabama March 31, 2023 No. 1200485Not cited
The plaintiff sued the decedent's employer, alleging that the employer (through its doctor) negligently advised the decedent to have the surgery in Saudi Arabia.
An assertion of medical negligence was clear in Bui because Duong's doctor was employed by his employer. No such clarity exists on the facts as pleaded by Ghee.
treating physician or such a physician's employer.' " Id.
-
Supreme Court of Alabama September 12, 2025 No. SC-2025-0019Not cited
Arant[, a physician employed by Tanner who is alleged to have committed medical negligence,] does not practice medicine in Alabama, is not licensed to practice medicine in Alabama, and has never practiced or been licensed to practice
initial decision to transport Cole to Georgia, could create jurisdiction over a foreign corporation not registered, licensed, or doing business in Alabama, requiring it to defend a medical-malpractice action in which the alleged negligence
Further, once the Georgia physician who allegedly caused the injury was dismissed with prejudice from this case pursuant to Alabama law, and Tanner remained the only defendant, proving vicarious liability became difficult, if not