-
365 N.W.2d 310 Court of Appeals of Minnesota April 2, 1985 No. C7-84-991
OPINION LANSING, Judge. Appellant Irving Burton appeals from an order denying a new trial in a dissolution action. He contends the trial court erred in failing to trace nonmarital property, dividing the marital assets equally, and awarding rental property and
-
394 N.W.2d 824 Court of Appeals of Minnesota October 21, 1986 No. CO-86-1064
OPINION NIERENGARTEN, Judge. Christopher Linder seeks review of an order of the supreme court appeal panel affirming the order of the Commissioner of Human Services directing Linder’s transfer to the department of corrections. We affirm. FACTS Linder, a
-
365 N.W.2d 304 Court of Appeals of Minnesota April 2, 1985 No. C8-84-1549
OPINION SEDGWICK, Judge. Respondent Otto William Schultz appealed an order denying all driving privileges pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 171.04(8) (1984). The Commissioner of Public Safety denied respondent’s motion for reinstatement of his driving privileges. He
-
372 N.W.2d 847 Court of Appeals of Minnesota August 20, 1985 No. C6-85-491
OPINION LESLIE, Judge. This is an appeal from a determination by the Commissioner of Economic Security that relator voluntarily terminated her em *849 ployment without good cause attributable to her employer. We reverse. FACTS Relator began working
-
465 N.W.2d 713 Court of Appeals of Minnesota April 29, 1991 No. C6-90-1025
OPINION DAVIES, Judge. Appellant insurer argues its fidelity bond did not cover actions of the bank’s president/owner and that there was no loss within the meaning of the bond. Appellant also argues that the trial court should not have granted summary judgment
-
372 N.W.2d 405 Court of Appeals of Minnesota August 13, 1985 No. C9-84-281
OPINION POPOVICH, Chief Judge. Pursuant to a stipulation for dissolution, the parties agreed respondent would retain occupancy of the homestead and appellant would receive an equity interest. Appellant challenged respondent’s right to continued occupancy of
-
385 N.W.2d 402 Court of Appeals of Minnesota April 22, 1986 No. C2-85-2111
OPINION SEDGWICK, Judge. This appeal is from an amended judgment which ordered appellant to pay $100 per month maintenance to respondent. We reverse. FACTS The 28 year marriage of the parties was dissolved in 1981. Respondent Rose Beck-strom was awarded
-
376 N.W.2d 274 Court of Appeals of Minnesota November 5, 1985 No. C4-85-408
OPINION RANDALL, Judge. Joseph Whitney (appellant) sued his attorney Asa Buttrick (respondent) for legal malpractice, as a result of respondent’s handling of the sale of appellant’s 75% interest in Imperial Developers (Imperial) to Allen Schefers, a 25% partner
-
376 N.W.2d 733 Court of Appeals of Minnesota November 12, 1985 No. C8-85-1125
OPINION NIERENGARTEN, Judge. William Robertson appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Marlys Robertson the option to purchase the parties’ homestead. We reverse and remand. FACTS Marlys and William Robertson were awarded a dissolution of marriage
-
416 N.W.2d 194 Court of Appeals of Minnesota December 8, 1987 Nos. C8-87-688, C2-87-783
OPINION RANDALL, Judge. An adjudication of neglect was entered against appellant parents on December 3, 1983. Their children, RD, JD and CD were placed in foster care in July, 1984; the parents regained custody in August 1984. The parents separated in June
-
425 N.W.2d 309 Court of Appeals of Minnesota June 28, 1988 No. C4-88-195
OPINION HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Acting Judge. Relator Edna Lewis seeks review of a determination that her home health aides are “employees” for unemployment compensation purposes. We affirm. FACTS Edna Lewis is a 92-year-old stroke victim who resides in her
-
623 N.W.2d 909 Court of Appeals of Minnesota March 27, 2001 No. CX-00-771
OPINION R.A. RANDALL, Judge Appellant William John Hogetvedt was convicted of third-degree assault. Appellant argues that (1) the district court erred by admitting the victim’s out-of-court statements identifying appellant as her assailant under Minn. R. Evid
-
674 N.W.2d 238 Court of Appeals of Minnesota February 3, 2004 No. A03-931
OPINION KLAPHAKE, Judge. Appellant State of Minnesota challenges a pretrial order issued by the district court that suppressed evidence found during the search of a vehicle driven by respondent Ralland Isadore Kolb and resulted in the dismissal of controlled
-
680 N.W.2d 121 Court of Appeals of Minnesota June 1, 2004 No. A03-1239
OPINION G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge. On appeal from the district court’s dismissal of the charges against respondent Mark Ajaak Cham, the state argues that the district court improperly concluded that Cham was denied his right to a speedy trial. The state also
-
480 N.W.2d 121 Court of Appeals of Minnesota January 21, 1992 No. C5-91-37
OPINION RANDALL, Judge. This is an appeal from an order denying a defense motion, based on several differ *124 ent grounds, for summary judgment. The case involves alleged violations of federal and state constitutional rights, state tort claims, and an
-
673 N.W.2d 179 Court of Appeals of Minnesota December 30, 2003 No. A03-355
OPINION G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge. This matter is before the court of appeals on certiorari review from a decision of the commissioner of the Department of Employment and Economic Development. 1 The commissioner’s representative concluded under Minn.Stat
-
401 N.W.2d 418 Court of Appeals of Minnesota March 3, 1987 No. C5-86-1691
*419 OPINION LANSING, Judge. Burlington Northern appeals the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury to reduce its award for pain and suffering to present value. Kenneth Melin filed a notice of review on the issue of prejudgment interest. We affirm.
-
633 N.W.2d 533 Court of Appeals of Minnesota July 24, 2001 No. CX-00-2147
OPINION HANSON, Judge. Respondent Bank commenced this action to recover a refund of unconstitutionally discriminatory corporate excise taxes. There is no dispute that Respondent Bank overpaid its lawful taxes. The question is whether it perfected its statutory
-
491 N.W.2d 923 Court of Appeals of Minnesota January 28, 1993 No. CX-92-495
OPINION HARTEN, Judge. Appellants, taxpayers, contest a judgment affirming respondent City of Blaine’s special assessment on their property. Appellants contend the evidence does not support the trial court’s findings that the property benefits from the improvement
-
380 N.W.2d 211 Court of Appeals of Minnesota January 21, 1986 No. C7-85-1083
OPINION PARKER, Judge. This criminal appeal challenges the trial court’s revocation of probation and its imposition of a more severe sentence following the State’s motion to correct the original sentence because of an error in the sentencing guidelines worksheet
Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.