TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law
178,577 cases · browse · 0.12 s
  1. People v. Pratt
    California Court of Appeal March 25, 2025 No. B338996
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 3/25/25 P. v. Pratt CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule

  2. California Court of Appeal October 17, 2022 No. H049212
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 10/17/22 350 WSJ v. Winchester Pla za On The Row CA6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except

  3. California Court of Appeal October 24, 2022 No. B313131
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 10/24/22 Nashed v. Los Robles Regional Medical Center CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published

  4. California Court of Appeal October 25, 2022 No. F081598
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 10/25/22 Via Appia v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment etc. CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication

  5. California Court of Appeal October 25, 2022 No. F080496
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 10/25/22 Via Appia v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment etc. CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication

  6. 275 P. 471 California Court of Appeal March 7, 1929 No. 5461.

    *421 HOUSER, Acting P. J. Plaintiffs were the owners of certain furniture and furnishings which included an Italian statue which they wished to store for a time with the defendant and thereafter transport to a ranch located approximately one hundred miles from

  7. People v. Pinomi
    California Court of Appeal March 27, 2025 No. G062587
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 3/27/25 P. v. Pinomi CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule

  8. California Court of Appeal October 31, 2022 No. A163223
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 10/31/22 Spaulding Marine Center v. Auques Maritime Preservation CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered

  9. In re A.M.
    California Court of Appeal March 28, 2025 No. F088433
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 3/28/25 In re A.M. CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule

  10. California Court of Appeal April 1, 2025 No. B333011
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 4/1/25 Kirsch v. Santa Barbara County Civil Service Com. CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered

  11. People v. Carper
    California Court of Appeal May 15, 2025 No. D084273
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 5/15/25 P. v. Carper CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule

  12. People v. Pinkston
    5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274 California Court of Appeal September 30, 2003 No. B159294

    *389 Opinion CROSKEY, J. Steven Terrose Pinkston appeals the judgment entered after conviction by jury of evading an officer with willful disregard for the safety of persons and property, a felony, and evading arrest, a misdemeanor. (Veh. Code, §§ 2800.2, subd

  13. People v. Del Rio
    165 Cal. App. 4th 439 California Court of Appeal July 28, 2008 No. B203270
    Cited by 1 Dissent · Zelon

    ZELON, J. I respectfully dissent. Six years ago, in People v. Smith (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1072 [ 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 901 ] (Smith), this division addressed the difficult issue that arises again today. At that time, prior to critical decisions delineating the constitutional

  14. 43 Cal. App. 3d 189 California Court of Appeal November 18, 1974 No. Civ. 14046

    THE COURT. Defendants’ petition for rehearing points out that our opinion omits mention of the trial court’s finding that, shortly before the merger of Cal-Camellia into Gilmedco, “[p]laintiff, in writing, consented to the .assignment and to the transfer by operation

  15. 171 Cal. App. 4th 912 California Court of Appeal March 2, 2009 No. B199461

    Opinion PERLUSS, P. J. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (Guardian Life) allegedly sold Dr. David C. Powell a whole life insurance policy in 1993 by falsely promising through its agent John A. Davidson that earnings from the policy would be sufficient

  16. Barber v. Chang
    60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 760 California Court of Appeal June 13, 2007 No. G036448
    Cited by 21 Concurrence · Rylaarsdam

    RYLAARSDAM, J., Concurring. I concur. But I write separately to note that it was because of the limited scope of the landlord’s duty that was presented to the trial court that I agree to reverse the judgment. Not only the existence of a landlord’s duty, but also

  17. Chiba v. Greenwald
    67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 86 California Court of Appeal October 16, 2007 No. B193173

    Opinion ZELON, J. The cohabitating partner of a deceased musician sued the administrator of the decedent’s estate under an agreement alleging breach of oral contract, quantum meruit, declaratory relief and constructive trust. Because the agreement required

  18. 178 Cal. App. 4th 680 California Court of Appeal October 23, 2009 No. H032375
    Cited by 10 Concurrence · Mihara

    MIHARA, J., Concurring. Appellant Santa Cruz County (the County) challenges the trial court’s order requiring it to grant plaintiffs’ application for a property tax basis transfer. The issue is whether, when a replacement dwelling is constructed on a lot already

  19. People v. Sharma
    California Court of Appeal March 26, 2025 No. A168273
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 3/26/25 P. v. Sharma CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule

  20. People v. Muro
    California Court of Appeal March 26, 2025 No. B338661
    Not cited Unpublished

    Filed 3/26/25 P. v. Muro CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list