Newcomb, J. J. This was a suit against the appellants and Herman Riekoff and wife for the alleged tortious conversion of three casks of wine, the property of the plaintiff. In the year 1866, one Anselm Frank was a wholesale liquor dealer in the city of Indianapolis

Perkins, J. Suit to quiet title. The complaint contains two paragraphs. The first describes the real estate, alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee simple of it, and avers “ that the defendant claims title to said real estate, and an interest therein

Blair, J. "This was an action for an injunction. The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that the defendants, Margaret C. Brouse, Annie B. Manlove, and Abbie L. Pearce, being the owners of certain real estate in the city of Indianapolis, upon which was situated

Blair, J. The plaintiff, in his amended complaint, alleges that he is the owner of certain lots in the city of Indianapolis, having certain buildings thereon, and that the defendant is the owner of certain other lots immediately adjoining those of the plaintiff

Blair, J. This is a suit upon an appeal bond. The plaintiff avers that he obtained a judgment at Special Term on the 18th of May, 1872, against the defendant, Porter, for the sum of $90, and for possession of certain real estate, from which judgment the said

The plaintiffs pray an injunction against the collection of an assessment on their lands for the benefit- of the Gravel Road Company, defendant, under the act of May 14, 1869. Section 1, of that Act, provides that a gravel road company, having a valid and solvent

Rand, J. This is an- application for an injunction, enjoining the defendants from using a trade mark, which plaintiffs-claim belongs to them. It appears from the affidavits filed, that in 1859 James L. & Walter N. Evans were partners and millers at Noblesville

Newcomb, J. The plaintiff alleges that he owns stock in? the First National Bank of Indianapolis, to the amount of $18,000, and on behalf of himself, and all others interested in the questions presented, he files his complaint, praying aitinjunction to restrain

Newcomb, J. Sylvester filed his complaint against Mary E. Noble, Winston P. Noble, her husband, Daniel Macauley, Mayor, and John S. Newman, Leon Kahn, Temple C. Harrison, William D. Wiles, James H. Woodburn, Wm. W. Weaver, Erie Locke, Isaac Thalman, James McB

Langham, P. J., In this case a true bill was found by the grand jury on June 4, 1924, the case was called for trial on June 20th, plea entered, jury sworn, the Commonwealth’s evidence presented, whereupon the *218 trial judge informed counsel and instructed

Newcomb, J. The plaintiff, as endorsee of Wing & Vandusur, sued the defendant on a promissory note payable at the First National Bank of Indianapolis. The complaint alleges that the note was endorsed to plaintiff for value, by the payees, before maturity, and

Blair,' J. This is an action by the plaintiff to foreclose a mortgage given to secure the payment of two promissory notes made by the defendant Samuel Tinsman to the plain *292 tiff, each for $1,250, dated November 17th, 1870, one due in one year from date, and

Blair, J. This was a suit to recover the penalty allowed by statute for turning off the road of plaintiff, and driving around the toll gate to defraud the plaintiff of her tolls. The cause was originally commenced before a Justice of the Peace, and brought to

Blair, J. This is a suit by Sophia Kirtz against Robert Spaugh, and Charles S. Boynton, on a promissory note, made by the defendants to the plaintiff, dated January 12, 1870, due'one day after date. The defendant Spaugh suffered a default. Defendant Boynton

Blaik, J. The complaint in this case charges that the defendants wrongfully took from the person of the plaintiff, and without his consent, converted to their own use, United States currency, and bank bills of the value of eight hundred dollars, wherefore, &c

Newcomb, J. The plaintiff sued to recover possession of real estate. There were two paragraphs of the complaint to the first of which a dem urrer was sustained. The second paragraph is as follows : *399 “ And for second cause of action the plaintiff says the

Rand, J. This was a suit brought by Matilda Kemp against Charles Dickson, James C. Dickson, and William E. Dickson. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first alleges that plaintiff is the owner of a certificate of twenty shares of the capital stock of the

Rand, J. This was a suit brought by Stout against the Railroad Company, in which he alleges that he was crossing defendant’s track in a two-horse wagon, where it crosses the public highway, called the Rockville Road, and that the defendant’s servants carelessly

Perkins, J. Sigler sued Coder and Carpenter on a bill for lumber delivered to them as partners. Coder made default. Carpenter answered, that the partnership had been dissolved, and that after its dissolution Sigler received from Coder some money, and Coder’s

Rand, J. This is a suit ’brought upon a promissory sole .executed by J. R. Randall .& Co., and payable to the order of the firm ©f Lawyer & Hall, at the First National Bank of -Shelbyville, and by Lawyer & Hall endorsed to said banlc, and by it to plaintiff.