TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. 1994)

296 citing cases

Negative treatment
Depth Newest Oldest Most cited
Majority opinions only
1 2–3 4–9 10+ times cited
  1. Sue Tuley v. Teresa Ortiz De Ruiz as of the Estate of Dr. Francisco Aurelio Ruiz-Ortiz
    Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)February 24, 2004

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239,   240 (Tex. 1994).

  2. Hunsucker v. Fustok
    238 S.W.3d 421 Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)July 12, 2007

    Hosp., 156 S.W.3d at 543 (citing Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994)). If the act or omission alleged in the complaint is an inseparable part of the rendition of health care services, then the claim is a health care liability claim.

  3. Smith v. Elliott
    68 S.W.3d 844 Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)February 20, 2002

    In answering this question, we look primarily to three sources: the MLIIA section 12.01(a); the Texas Supreme Court case of Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 , 243 n. 5 (Tex.1994); and the Statute of Frauds, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 26.01 .

  4. Belma Key v. Hector M. Viera, M.D.
    Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)February 12, 2009

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994). Key asserts that the Texas Supreme Court has held that such claims are not precluded by the MLIIA, citing Sorokolit .

  5. MacGregor Medical Ass'n v. Campbell
    985 S.W.2d 38 Texas Supreme CourtMarch 11, 1999

    Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.1994), we held that [t]here can be no DTPA claim against a physician for damages for personal injury or death if the damages result, or are alleged to result, from the physician’s negligence; however, if the alleged DTPA claim is

  6. Savage v. Psychiatric Institute of Bedford, Inc.
    965 S.W.2d 745 Court of Appeals of TexasMarch 19, 1998

    Jeffery, 907 S.W.2d 446, 448 (Tex.1995); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994); Waters ex rel. Walton v. Del-Ky, Inc., 844 S.W.2d 250, 259 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992, no writ).

  7. Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hospital System
    933 S.W.2d 668 Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)November 14, 1996

    In Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.1994), the Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the DTPA to claims against physicians and health care providers for damages for personal injuries or death.

  8. Campbell v. MacGREGOR MEDICAL ASS'N
    966 S.W.2d 538 Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)June 20, 1997

    Rhodes, a plastic surgeon instructed a client and her husband to select a picture of a nude model from a magazine, promising that, following surgery, her breasts would look like those in the picture she selected. 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994).

  9. Enrique Lopez, D/B/A Maternidad La Piedad v. Marina Edith Osuna, Individually and as Next Friend for Sarai Edith Gonzalez and Benito Gonzalez Cantu
    453 S.W.3d 60 Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)November 26, 2014

    Osuna relies heavily on Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.1994).

  10. Nguyen v. Kim
    3 S.W.3d 146 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)September 9, 1999

    In Sorokolit v.

  11. Mills v. Pate
    225 S.W.3d 277 Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)June 1, 2006

    Stover , 907 S.W.2d 448, 449 (Tex. 1995)(per curiam); Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994).  

  12. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubio
    185 S.W.3d 842 Texas Supreme CourtOctober 14, 2005

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994).

  13. Lee v. Boothe
    235 S.W.3d 448 Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)October 3, 2007

    Stover, 907 S.W.2d 448, 450 (Tex.1995); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994); Boothe v. Dixon, 180 S.W.3d 915 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, no pet.); Williams v. Walker, 995 S.W.2d 740, 741 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1999, no pet.).

  14. Wright v. Fowler
    991 S.W.2d 343 Court of Appeals of TexasApril 8, 1999

    Ann. art. 4590i, § 12.01(a) (Vernon Supp.1999); see Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994).

  15. Mulligan v. Beverly Enterprises-Texas Inc.
    954 S.W.2d 881 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)November 13, 1997

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994) (noting warranty or representation claims requiring a determination of whether the standard of care was breached involve negligence and are precluded).

  16. Scott v. Beechnut Manor
    171 S.W.3d 338 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)August 18, 2005

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994). However, if the alleged DTPA claim is not based on the physician's breach of the accepted standard of medical care, such DTPA claim is not precluded by section 12.01(a). Id.

  17. Rose v. Garland Community Hospital
    87 S.W.3d 188 Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)August 20, 2002

    . § 312.005 (Vernon 1998); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex.1994). The Legislature’s intent is found in the plain and common meaning of the words and terms used in the statute, unless the language in the statute is ambiguous.

  18. Scott, Arlene, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Scott, Doretha, Scott, James David, Hubbard, Jerry Scott, Scott, James David Scott, Norman and Scott, Albert v. Beechnut Manor, Vencare Inc., Vencor Hospital, Vencor, Inc., Living Centers of America, Inc., and Dr. Robert E. Teague
    Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)June 21, 2005

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994).   However, if the alleged DTPA claim is not based on the physician = s breach of the accepted standard of medical care, such DTPA claim is not precluded by section 12.01(a).   Id.  

  19. Marvella Loya v. Hickory Trail Hospital, L.P.
    Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)November 30, 2022

    Both parties rely on the supreme court’s opinion in Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. 1994).

  20. Rogers v. Crossroads Nursing Service, Inc.
    13 S.W.3d 417 Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.March 9, 2000

    See generally Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.1994).

  21. Gomez v. Matey
    55 S.W.3d 732 Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.August 31, 2001

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994); Rogers v. Crossroads Nursing Service, Inc., 13 S.W.3d 417, 420 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1999, no pet.). For example, the general provisions of the Act apply only to “health care liability claims.”

  22. Boothe v. Dixon
    180 S.W.3d 915 Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)December 13, 2005

    (citing Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994)).

  23. Jani-King of Memphis, Inc. v. Yates
    965 S.W.2d 665 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)March 12, 1998

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex.1994). If the statute is clear, the court must give the statute its plain and common meaning. Id.

  24. Andrade Garcia v. Columbia Medical Center of Sherman
    996 F. Supp. 605 E.D. TexasMarch 2, 1998

    Rhodes, the Texas Supreme Court held that a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) claim is allowed against a physician if the claim is not “merely the recharacterization of a negligence suit.” 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994).

  25. Gonzales v. Concerned Citizens of Webberville
    173 S.W.3d 112 Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)August 31, 2005

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex.1994); see also Montgomery Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex.2000).

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list