TaiLexi AI 美國判例檢索

引用本案的判決

引用以下判決的案件： Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. 1994)

296 件引用判決

負面評價
引用深度 最新 最舊 被引用最多
只看多數意見
1 2–3 4–9 10+ 次引用
  1. Sue Tuley v. Teresa Ortiz De Ruiz as of the Estate of Dr. Francisco Aurelio Ruiz-Ortiz
    Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)2004年2月24日

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239,   240 (Tex. 1994).

  2. Hunsucker v. Fustok
    238 S.W.3d 421 Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)2007年7月12日

    Hosp., 156 S.W.3d at 543 (citing Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994)). If the act or omission alleged in the complaint is an inseparable part of the rendition of health care services, then the claim is a health care liability claim.

  3. Smith v. Elliott
    68 S.W.3d 844 Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)2002年2月20日

    In answering this question, we look primarily to three sources: the MLIIA section 12.01(a); the Texas Supreme Court case of Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 , 243 n. 5 (Tex.1994); and the Statute of Frauds, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 26.01 .

  4. Belma Key v. Hector M. Viera, M.D.
    Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)2009年2月12日

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994). Key asserts that the Texas Supreme Court has held that such claims are not precluded by the MLIIA, citing Sorokolit .

  5. MacGregor Medical Ass'n v. Campbell
    985 S.W.2d 38 Texas Supreme Court1999年3月11日

    Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.1994), we held that [t]here can be no DTPA claim against a physician for damages for personal injury or death if the damages result, or are alleged to result, from the physician’s negligence; however, if the alleged DTPA claim is

  6. Savage v. Psychiatric Institute of Bedford, Inc.
    965 S.W.2d 745 Court of Appeals of Texas1998年3月19日

    Jeffery, 907 S.W.2d 446, 448 (Tex.1995); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994); Waters ex rel. Walton v. Del-Ky, Inc., 844 S.W.2d 250, 259 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992, no writ).

  7. Drury v. Baptist Memorial Hospital System
    933 S.W.2d 668 Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)1996年11月14日

    In Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.1994), the Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the DTPA to claims against physicians and health care providers for damages for personal injuries or death.

  8. Campbell v. MacGREGOR MEDICAL ASS'N
    966 S.W.2d 538 Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)1997年6月20日

    Rhodes, a plastic surgeon instructed a client and her husband to select a picture of a nude model from a magazine, promising that, following surgery, her breasts would look like those in the picture she selected. 889 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Tex. 1994).

  9. Enrique Lopez, D/B/A Maternidad La Piedad v. Marina Edith Osuna, Individually and as Next Friend for Sarai Edith Gonzalez and Benito Gonzalez Cantu
    453 S.W.3d 60 Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)2014年11月26日

    Osuna relies heavily on Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex.1994).

  10. Nguyen v. Kim
    3 S.W.3d 146 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)1999年9月9日

    In Sorokolit v.

  11. Mills v. Pate
    225 S.W.3d 277 Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)2006年6月1日

    Stover , 907 S.W.2d 448, 449 (Tex. 1995)(per curiam); Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994).  

  12. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. Rubio
    185 S.W.3d 842 Texas Supreme Court2005年10月14日

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994).

  13. Lee v. Boothe
    235 S.W.3d 448 Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)2007年10月3日

    Stover, 907 S.W.2d 448, 450 (Tex.1995); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994); Boothe v. Dixon, 180 S.W.3d 915 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, no pet.); Williams v. Walker, 995 S.W.2d 740, 741 (Tex.App.-Eastland 1999, no pet.).

  14. Wright v. Fowler
    991 S.W.2d 343 Court of Appeals of Texas1999年4月8日

    Ann. art. 4590i, § 12.01(a) (Vernon Supp.1999); see Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994).

  15. Mulligan v. Beverly Enterprises-Texas Inc.
    954 S.W.2d 881 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)1997年11月13日

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994) (noting warranty or representation claims requiring a determination of whether the standard of care was breached involve negligence and are precluded).

  16. Scott v. Beechnut Manor
    171 S.W.3d 338 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)2005年8月18日

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994). However, if the alleged DTPA claim is not based on the physician's breach of the accepted standard of medical care, such DTPA claim is not precluded by section 12.01(a). Id.

  17. Rose v. Garland Community Hospital
    87 S.W.3d 188 Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)2002年8月20日

    . § 312.005 (Vernon 1998); Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex.1994). The Legislature’s intent is found in the plain and common meaning of the words and terms used in the statute, unless the language in the statute is ambiguous.

  18. Scott, Arlene, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Scott, Doretha, Scott, James David, Hubbard, Jerry Scott, Scott, James David Scott, Norman and Scott, Albert v. Beechnut Manor, Vencare Inc., Vencor Hospital, Vencor, Inc., Living Centers of America, Inc., and Dr. Robert E. Teague
    Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)2005年6月21日

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes , 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex. 1994).   However, if the alleged DTPA claim is not based on the physician = s breach of the accepted standard of medical care, such DTPA claim is not precluded by section 12.01(a).   Id.  

  19. Marvella Loya v. Hickory Trail Hospital, L.P.
    Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)2022年11月30日

    Both parties rely on the supreme court’s opinion in Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239 (Tex. 1994).

  20. Rogers v. Crossroads Nursing Service, Inc.
    13 S.W.3d 417 Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.2000年3月9日

    See generally Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 243 (Tex.1994).

  21. Gomez v. Matey
    55 S.W.3d 732 Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.2001年8月31日

    Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994); Rogers v. Crossroads Nursing Service, Inc., 13 S.W.3d 417, 420 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1999, no pet.). For example, the general provisions of the Act apply only to “health care liability claims.”

  22. Boothe v. Dixon
    180 S.W.3d 915 Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)2005年12月13日

    (citing Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994)).

  23. Jani-King of Memphis, Inc. v. Yates
    965 S.W.2d 665 Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)1998年3月12日

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex.1994). If the statute is clear, the court must give the statute its plain and common meaning. Id.

  24. Andrade Garcia v. Columbia Medical Center of Sherman
    996 F. Supp. 605 E.D. Texas1998年3月2日

    Rhodes, the Texas Supreme Court held that a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”) claim is allowed against a physician if the claim is not “merely the recharacterization of a negligence suit.” 889 S.W.2d 239, 242 (Tex.1994).

  25. Gonzales v. Concerned Citizens of Webberville
    173 S.W.3d 112 Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)2005年8月31日

    See Sorokolit v. Rhodes, 889 S.W.2d 239, 241 (Tex.1994); see also Montgomery Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex.2000).

鍵盤快捷鍵

/移到搜尋框
j k下一筆／上一筆結果
Enter開啟選取的結果
n p判決內的下一個／上一個命中字詞
c複製本案引註
+ −放大／縮小內文
?顯示這份清單