Rease v. State
判決
493 So.2d 454 (1986)
Michael REASE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 68069.
Supreme Court of Florida.
September 4, 1986.
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Patricia Conners, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
OVERTON, Justice.
This is a petition to review Rease v. State, 478 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the district court certified the *455 following question as being of great public importance:
Whether, when the sentencing guidelines recommend a sentence of life imprisonment, the trial court may sentence a defendant to life imprisonment plus sixty years in prison on other counts, to run consecutive to the life sentence, without stating clear and convincing reasons for departing from the guidelines.
Id. at 1151 . We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
We answer the question in the negative and quash the district court decision. We conclude that the trial court did deviate from the recommended sentence by adding consecutive sentences on other counts arising from the same incident, when those convictions were taken into account in computing the recommended sentence. The trial judge failed to set forth proper reasons for his departure. We adopt and approve the analysis and reasoning of the dissent of Judge Zehmer directed to the specific issue in this case, quash the district court decision, and direct the district court to remand this cause for resentencing.
It is so ordered.
McDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, SHAW, EHRLICH and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
後續判決如何描述本案
目前還沒有後續判決對本案寫過括號說明。
被 29 件判決引用
查看全部引用判決 →最倚重本案的判決 ⓘ
引用清單不是判例效力查核(citator):只顯示後來的判決引用了本案,不代表遵循、區別或推翻本案。引用前請自行確認有無負面歷史。