TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citing references

Opinions citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 2009 Ohio 4175, 916 N.E.2d 1029

20 citing cases

  1. 2022 Ohio 4265, 218 N.E.3d 731 Ohio Supreme CourtDecember 1, 2022

    We noted that Schelling was an exceptional case in that the doctor was not amenable to suit because of a bankruptcy stay and discharge. Id., 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, at ¶ 32 .

  2. 2021 Ohio 29 Ohio Court of AppealsJanuary 8, 2021

    Schelling, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, at ¶ 32 .

  3. Supreme Court of IowaMay 14, 2021

    Luke’s Surgicenter-Lee’s Summit, LLC, 587 S.W.3d 647 , 654–57 (Mo. 2019) (en banc) (same); Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029 , 1033–34 (Ohio 2009) (same).

  4. Rabelo v. Nasif
    30 Mass. L. Rptr. 547 Massachusetts Superior CourtDecember 27, 2012

    Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1036 , 123 Ohio St.3d 387, 393 (Ohio 2009).

  5. 2020 Ohio 5535, 170 N.E.3d 1 Ohio Supreme CourtDecember 8, 2020

    Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, ¶ 30 , in which we determined that a doctor’s “lack of amenability to suit does not in and of itself extinguish [a plaintiff’s] negligent-credentialing claim against [a] hospital.”

  6. 30 Mass. L. Rptr. 653 Massachusetts Superior CourtJanuary 18, 2012

    Humphrey, the Ohio Supreme Court acknowledged that in order to bring a negligent credentiaiing claim against a hospital, the plaintiff must first establish medical malpractice against the doctor. 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1036 (2009).

  7. S.D. OhioJune 29, 2020

    Plaintiff contends that two post-amendment Ohio Supreme Court decisions, Schelling v. Humphrey, 123 Ohio St. 3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029 , and Schmitz v.

  8. 2022 Ohio 2138 Ohio Court of AppealsJune 23, 2022

    Schelling v. Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009- Ohio-4175, 916 N.E.2d 1029, ¶ 8 .

  9. Martinez v. Park
    959 N.E.2d 259 Indiana Court of AppealsDecember 7, 2011

    Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (2009)).

  10. 2013 Ohio 5451 Ohio Court of AppealsDecember 12, 2013

    Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175, ¶ 14 , overruled in part on other grounds Clark v.

  11. 2023 Ohio 3374, 224 N.E.3d 1211 Ohio Court of AppealsSeptember 21, 2023

    No. 2006 CA 74, 2007-Ohio-1333 ; Schelling v. Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 ; and State ex rel. Sawicki v. Lucas Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 126 Ohio St.3d 198 , 2010-Ohio-3299 .

  12. 2020 WY 96, 468 P.3d 676 Wyoming Supreme CourtJuly 27, 2020

    .”); Schelling v.

  13. Beswick v. Bell
    940 N.E.2d 338 Indiana Court of AppealsDecember 22, 2010

    In Schelling v.

  14. Kentucky Supreme CourtOctober 31, 2017

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  15. Kentucky Supreme CourtOctober 31, 2017

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  16. Kentucky Supreme CourtOctober 31, 2017

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  17. Kentucky Supreme CourtOctober 31, 2017

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  18. Sixth CircuitJanuary 10, 2022 Unpublished

    Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009).

  19. S.D. OhioApril 26, 2021

    Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009) (citation omitted). Plaintiff claims that Dr. Kitchen was negligent, and stated that Dr. Kitchen was a physician in SEORMC’s emergency department. (Id. ¶¶ 3, 52–56.) Plaintiff is now claiming Dr.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list