TaiLexi AI 美國判例檢索

引用本案的判決

引用以下判決的案件: Schelling v. Humphrey, 2009 Ohio 4175, 916 N.E.2d 1029

20 件引用判決

  1. Walling v. Brenya
    2022 Ohio 4265, 218 N.E.3d 731 Ohio Supreme Court2022年12月1日

    We noted that Schelling was an exceptional case in that the doctor was not amenable to suit because of a bankruptcy stay and discharge. Id., 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, at ¶ 32 .

  2. Walling v. Brenya
    2021 Ohio 29 Ohio Court of Appeals2021年1月8日

    Schelling, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, at ¶ 32 .

  3. Supreme Court of Iowa2021年5月14日

    Luke’s Surgicenter-Lee’s Summit, LLC, 587 S.W.3d 647 , 654–57 (Mo. 2019) (en banc) (same); Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029 , 1033–34 (Ohio 2009) (same).

  4. Rabelo v. Nasif
    30 Mass. L. Rptr. 547 Massachusetts Superior Court2012年12月27日

    Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1036 , 123 Ohio St.3d 387, 393 (Ohio 2009).

  5. 2020 Ohio 5535, 170 N.E.3d 1 Ohio Supreme Court2020年12月8日

    Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, ¶ 30 , in which we determined that a doctor’s “lack of amenability to suit does not in and of itself extinguish [a plaintiff’s] negligent-credentialing claim against [a] hospital.”

  6. 30 Mass. L. Rptr. 653 Massachusetts Superior Court2012年1月18日

    Humphrey, the Ohio Supreme Court acknowledged that in order to bring a negligent credentiaiing claim against a hospital, the plaintiff must first establish medical malpractice against the doctor. 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1036 (2009).

  7. Landrum v. Durrani
    S.D. Ohio2020年6月29日

    Plaintiff contends that two post-amendment Ohio Supreme Court decisions, Schelling v. Humphrey, 123 Ohio St. 3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 , 916 N.E.2d 1029 , and Schmitz v.

  8. 2022 Ohio 2138 Ohio Court of Appeals2022年6月23日

    Schelling v. Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009- Ohio-4175, 916 N.E.2d 1029, ¶ 8 .

  9. Martinez v. Park
    959 N.E.2d 259 Indiana Court of Appeals2011年12月7日

    Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (2009)).

  10. 2013 Ohio 5451 Ohio Court of Appeals2013年12月12日

    Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175, ¶ 14 , overruled in part on other grounds Clark v.

  11. 2023 Ohio 3374, 224 N.E.3d 1211 Ohio Court of Appeals2023年9月21日

    No. 2006 CA 74, 2007-Ohio-1333 ; Schelling v. Humphrey, 123 Ohio St.3d 387 , 2009-Ohio-4175 ; and State ex rel. Sawicki v. Lucas Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 126 Ohio St.3d 198 , 2010-Ohio-3299 .

  12. 2020 WY 96, 468 P.3d 676 Wyoming Supreme Court2020年7月27日

    .”); Schelling v.

  13. Beswick v. Bell
    940 N.E.2d 338 Indiana Court of Appeals2010年12月22日

    In Schelling v.

  14. Kentucky Supreme Court2017年10月31日

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  15. Kentucky Supreme Court2017年10月31日

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  16. Kentucky Supreme Court2017年10月31日

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  17. Kentucky Supreme Court2017年10月31日

    L.J. 413 , 422 (2016) (citing Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009)). Other states have recognized the tort by finding negligent credentialing inherent in, and the natural extension of, well- established common law rights.

  18. Sixth Circuit2022年1月10日 未刊載(先例效力有限)

    Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009).

  19. Knight v. Kitchen
    S.D. Ohio2021年4月26日

    Schelling v. Humphrey, 916 N.E.2d 1029, 1033 (Ohio 2009) (citation omitted). Plaintiff claims that Dr. Kitchen was negligent, and stated that Dr. Kitchen was a physician in SEORMC’s emergency department. (Id. ¶¶ 3, 52–56.) Plaintiff is now claiming Dr.

鍵盤快捷鍵

/移到搜尋框
j k下一筆/上一筆結果
Enter開啟選取的結果
n p判決內的下一個/上一個命中字詞
c複製本案引註
+ −放大/縮小內文
?顯示這份清單