-
Veterans Claims April 27, 2021 No. 19-2805Not cited
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 19-2805 ANTHONY HUERTA, APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued August 20, 2020 Decided April 27, 2021) Scott
-
Veterans Claims July 23, 2024 No. 21-6249Not cited
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 21-6249 MAI DE HART, APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued November 15, 2023 Decided July 23, 2024) Kaitlyn
-
Veterans Claims July 11, 2022 No. 20-5580Not cited
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 20-5580 JACK L. STOVER, APPELLANT , V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued April 5, 2022 Decided July 11, 2022) Zachary
-
Veterans Claims February 26, 2021 No. 19-2009Not cited
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 19-2009 ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., APPELLANT, V. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided February 26, 2021) Christopher F.
-
16 Vet. App. 467 Veterans Claims November 13, 2002 No. 98-354Not cited
ORDER PER CURIAM. On June 7, 2002, the Court issued a per curiam order withdrawing the August 30, 2000, panel decision and ordering the parties to file supplemental memoranda regarding the Secretary’s supplemental response and the effect, if any, on the instant
-
Veterans Claims October 29, 2020 No. 18-4601Not cited
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 18-4601 JAMES R. WELCOME, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT L. WILKIE, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued July 14, 2020 Decided October 29, 2020)
-
22 Vet. App. 373 Veterans Claims February 17, 2009 No. 04-0381(E)Not cited
DAVIS, Judge: Before the Court is attorney Keith D. Snyder’s October 26, 2007, application for an award of $24,908.68 for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). The Secretary argues that his position
-
23 Vet. App. 1 Veterans Claims February 17, 2009 No. 07-0558
ORDER PER CURIAM: The appellant, William N. Clemons appeals through counsel a December 6, 2006, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision that denied his claim for disability compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Record (R.) at 1-8. The
-
23 Vet. App. 243 Veterans Claims September 22, 2009 No. 07-1617
HAGEL, Judge: Attorney Mark R. Lippman, who is self-represented, appeals a June 11, 2007, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board granted entitlement to attorney fees for past-due benefits in the amount of $9,123.28, but denied entitlement
-
26 Vet. App. 376 Veterans Claims November 5, 2013 No. 12-2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 12-2017 JIMMY H. FLOORE, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued September 10, 2013 Decided November 5, 2013
-
9 Vet. App. 271 Veterans Claims August 5, 1996 No. 95-188
ORDER PER CURIAM. On February 24, 1995, the appellant filed his Notice of Appeal (NOA) from an August 25, 1994, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision. Because the appellant was represented before the BVA by the Disabled American Veterans (DAV)
-
27 Vet. App. 233 Veterans Claims January 23, 2015 No. 13-2694
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-2694 WILLIE C. WAGES, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued December 12, 2014 Decided January 23, 2015
-
Veterans Claims September 12, 2017 No. 15-4788Not cited
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 15-4788 ROBERT W. JENSEN, APPELLANT, V. DAVID J. SHULKIN, M.D., SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued March 20, 2017 Decided September 12
-
18 Vet. App. 177 Veterans Claims June 29, 2004 No. 98-1849
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 98-1849 EDWARD R. ANDREWS, JR., APPELLANT , V. ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided June 29, 2004 ) Kenneth M.
-
19 Vet. App. 339 Veterans Claims September 9, 2005 No. 8-05Not cited
ORDER The devastation caused by Hurricane Katrina in Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi has required the United States Postal Service (USPS) to suspend mail service to zip codes beginning with the following three digits: 395, 396, 700, 701, 703, and 704. This
-
2 Vet. App. 584 Veterans Claims July 10, 1992 No. 90-854
FARLEY, Associate Judge: On August 17, 1990, the Court received appellant’s Notice of Appeal (NOA) of a decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) dated May 23, 1990. On April 22, 1991, appellant asked the Court to stay the appeal because the BVA had decided
-
10 Vet. App. 11 Veterans Claims January 3, 1997 No. 96-1166
ORDER PER CURIAM. In a decision dated July 18, 1996, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) denied the appellant’s claim for entitlement to service connection for the cause of the veteran’s death. On September 5, 1996, the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration
-
10 Vet. App. 38 Veterans Claims January 14, 1997 No. 95-1073
NEBEKER, Chief Judge: The appellant, Teresa J. Holmes, appeals a September 29, 1995, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which found that the character of the service member’s discharge was a statutory bar to entitlement to VA benefits.
-
10 Vet. App. 43 Veterans Claims January 30, 1997 No. 95-59Cited by 1 Concurrence · Steinberg
STEINBERG, Judge, concurring: I do not believe that the criteria for en banc review are met despite my agreement with Judge Kramer’s separate opinion that the Court reached an incorrect result (affirmance) in the majority opinion.
-
10 Vet. App. 51 Veterans Claims January 16, 1997 No. 93-0696Cited by 37 Concurrence · Holdaway
HOLDAWAY, Judge, concurring: It appears that the applicant, Mr. Ussery, who now applies for “reimbursement of attomeys’s fees” under EAJA, was represented pro bono and thus did not either in fact or *55 in law incur attorney fees. The EAJA statute, 28 U.S.C
Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.