1. Henning Corp. v. Commissioner Copy cite
   1960 T.C. Memo. 90 U.S. Tax Court May 9, 1960 Nos. 71539, 72442.
   Not cited Unpublished

   Henning Corporation v. Commissioner. Forrest K. Henning v. Commissioner. Henning Corp. v. Commissioner Docket Nos. 71539, 72442. United States Tax Court T.C. Memo 1960-90 ; 1960 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 197 ; 19 T.C.M. (CCH) 461 ; T.C.M. (RIA) 60090 ; May 9,

2. Wentworth v. United States Copy cite
   5 Ct. Cl. 302 Court of Claims December 15, 1869
   Cited by 3

   Milligan, J., delivered the opinion of the court: This action is brought in the name of Charles C. Wentworth; but it is averred in the petition that Matthias Ellis and Joseph *306 Pratt are equal joiut owners with him. in the claim. The amount sought to be

3. Bernheimer v. United States Copy cite
   5 Ct. Cl. 549 Court of Claims December 15, 1869
   Not cited

   Nott, J., delivered tbe opinion of the court: This is an action brought under th*e “ Abandoned or captured property act’’ to recover the proceeds of nine hundred and seventy-four bales of cotton captured at Savannah; which ];>roceeds, it is alleged, amount to

4. Spain v. United States Copy cite
   5 Ct. Cl. 598 Court of Claims December 15, 1869
   Not cited Dissent · Pecicmilligan

   Pecic, and Milligan, J., J., dissented: Not being satisfied that the claimant did not give aid or comfort to the rebellion.

5. Saxton v. United States Copy cite
   5 Ct. Cl. 106 Court of Claims December 15, 1869
   Not cited

   Milligan, J., delivered tbe opinion of tbe court: This case was beard with tbe case of Elipbalet Whittlesey, and in principle it is identical witb it, and must be ruled by it. We, therefore, ñnd tbe claimant entitled to recover as follows, viz: Commutation

6. Silverhill ex rel. Schiffer & Co. v. United States Copy cite
   5 Ct. Cl. 610 Court of Claims December 15, 1869
   Cited by 1

   Nott, J., delivered tbe opinion of tbe court: This is an action brought under tbe Abandoned or captured property act, in tbe name of Simeon W. Silverbill, a citizen of Savannah, for tbe use of Samuel Scbiffer, surviving partner of tbe firm of J. Scbiffer & Co

7. Wilcox v. United States Copy cite
   6 Ct. Cl. 77 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
   Cited by 1

   Nott, J., delivered tbe opinion of tbe court: These cases are now pending in tbe Supreme Court on appeal. Tbe claimants move for leave to file a replication to a “ special plea” of tbe defendants, nunc pro tuno. Tbe defendants object that tbe record bas gone

8. Roberts v. United States Copy cite
   6 Ct. Cl. 84 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
   Not cited Dissent · Nott

   Nott, J., dissenting: The construction of the court gives no effect to an act of Congress. Congress having passed the private act for the relief of the claimants, with knowledge of the facts, as appears by the reports of their committees, and while the claimants

9. Wanless v. United States Copy cite
   6 Ct. Cl. 123 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
   Cited by 1

   Losing-, J., delivered the opinion of the court: The action is for an alleged, breach of contract in not receiving at Fort Lyon two hundred and forty-one tons of hay, a portion of eight hundred tons contracted for. But the contract is not for an entire quantity

10. Harrison v. United States Copy cite
    6 Ct. Cl. 323 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
    Cited by 2 Dissent · Nott

    Nott, J., dissenting: I dissent from the judgment of the court upon the following grounds: 1. Non-resident aliens have no right to resort to the courts of a country, and come in only by treaty or through international comity. It is a controlling principle that

11. Brown v. United States Copy cite
    6 Ct. Cl. 171 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
    Cited by 11 Dissent · Loking

    Loking-, J., dissenting: The material facts are, that the claimants in a suit brought by them under the third section of the Act 12th March, 1863, recovered a judgment here on the 13th of April, 1868, for the net proceeds of fifty-two bales of ■ upland cotton

12. Fisher v. United States Copy cite
    6 Ct. Cl. 235 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
    Not cited

    Nott, J., delivered the opinion of the court: This is an action brought to recover the proceeds of eight *237 bales of upland cotton, captured at Savannah, amounting- to $2,120 40. The court finds as matter of fact in this case— First. In the year 1863 Daniel

13. Carlisle v. United States Copy cite
    6 Ct. Cl. 398 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
    Not cited Dissent · Boring

    Boring, J., dissenting: Because I think the claimants had a right to sell the products of their business to the Confederate Government as well as to individuals in the Confederate States, and I do not think the evidence shows that they entered into the business

14. Medway v. United States Copy cite
    6 Ct. Cl. 421 Court of Claims December 15, 1870
    Cited by 8

    Nott, J., delivered the opinion of the court: This is an action brought under the Abandoned or captured property aet, to recover $100,000 for one hundred and thirty bales of cotton captured at Wilmington, North Carolina. It is one of those extraordinary cases

15. Jimenez Rosas v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Copy cite
    Federal Claims July 14, 2020 No. 19-1030
    Not cited Unpublished

    In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 19-1030V UNPUBLISHED JAVIER JIMENEZ ROSAS, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: June 11, 2020 v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Ruling on Entitlement

16. Garza v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Copy cite
    Federal Claims September 12, 2025 No. 23-2125V
    Not cited Unpublished

    In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-2125V SONIA GARZA, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 13, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. William E. Cochran, Jr., Black

17. Ziegler v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Copy cite
    Federal Claims September 12, 2025 No. 24-1109V
    Not cited Unpublished

    In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 24-1109V CASSANDRA ZIEGLER, Chief Special Master Corcoran Petitioner, Filed: August 7, 2025 v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondent. Maximillian J. Muller, Muller

18. The Tolliver Group, Inc. v. United States Copy cite
    Federal Claims July 14, 2020 No. 17-1763
    Not cited

    In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1763C (Filed: July 14, 2020) ********************************** ) THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC., ) Federal contractor’s claim for partial ) reimbursement of legal fees and costs Plaintiff, ) incurred in successful

19. Appeal of Goss Copy cite
    4 B.T.A. 821 Board of Tax Appeals September 15, 1926 No. 4760
    Cited by 1

    *822 OPINION. Littleton : The decision of the question involved in this proceeding is governed by the opinion of the court in United States v. Robbins, 269 U. S. 315 , and the decision of the Board in the Appeal of D. Cerruti, 4 B. T. A. 682. Judgment for

20. Matthew Gorski v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Copy cite
    Federal Claims October 28, 2013 No. 13-224V
    Not cited Unpublished

    In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ******************** * MATTHEW GORSKI, * * No. 13-224V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran * v. * Filed: October 28, 2013 * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Entitlement; influenza (“flu

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.