TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law
71,660 cases · browse · 0.09 s
  1. 25 S.E. 567 Supreme Court of Georgia May 23, 1896

    Lumpkin, Justice. Certain creditors of the McIntyre Alliance Store, a mercantile corporation, brought against it an equitable petition for injunction and the-'appointment of a receiver, to which the directors of the corporation and several preferred cred *504

  2. 25 S.E. 769 Supreme Court of Georgia June 12, 1896

    Simmon's, Chief Justice. On April 18, 1893, a suit of which the present suit is a renewal, was brought against the administrator of RutherT ford to recover a certain sum alleged to have been received by the intestate on March 1, 1883, from one Franklin, in settlement

  3. Berry v. Berry
    25 S.E. 503 Supreme Court of Georgia May 4, 1896

    Simmons, Chief Justice. Pending ber application for permanent alimony, Mrs. Berry applied for temporary alimony. Upon tbe bearing of ber application for permanent alimony, tbe jury rendered a verdict against ber, which was set aside upon a motion for a new trial

  4. 25 S.E. 611 Supreme Court of Georgia June 18, 1896

    Lumpkin, Justice. The Mayor and Council of Griffin granted Ison a license-to sell spirituous liquors. He proceeded to erect a building in which to sell the same; purchased fixtures for use therein; bought a stock of liquors; engaged help, and otherwise incurred

  5. 34 L.R.A. 286 Supreme Court of Georgia June 18, 1896

    Simmons, Chief Justice. ' 1. Under the constitution of 1877, the jurisdiction of a justice’s court over actions arising ex delicto is confined to “cases of injuries or damages to personal property.” Code, §5153; James v. Smith & Bro., 62 Ga. 345, 347 ; Mayor

  6. Corley v. State
    20 S.E. 212 Supreme Court of Georgia October 8, 1894

    Judgment affirmed.

  7. 31 S.E. 588 Supreme Court of Georgia November 7, 1898

    Simmons, C. J. Upon the petition of various creditors, the assets of the firm of Moody & Brewster were placed in the hands of a receiver, and' an injunction was granted against them and other parties to restrain them from interfering with or disposing of the

  8. 26 S.E. 769 Supreme Court of Georgia March 5, 1897
    Not cited

    Simmons, C. J. Where a rale absolute for money had been granted in the-superior court against a constable, and he thereafter made a motion to set aside this rule upon several grounds, to which motion the respondent named made answer denying specifically each

  9. Sharp v. Hicks
    26 S.E. 729 Supreme Court of Georgia March 5, 1897
    Not cited

    Atkinson, J. The questions made by the bill of exceptions in this case having been fully examined and determined by this court upon the two writs of error therein which have heretofore been considered (see 89 Ga. 311 , and 94 Ga. 624 ); and the trial judge, in

  10. 26 S.E. 729 Supreme Court of Georgia March 5, 1897

    Atkinson, J. 1. Where in term time an order is passed directing that a mot-ion for new trial then pending be heard and determined at a day named in vacation, and time is given by the presiding judge until that date within which to perfect the brief of evidence

  11. 29 S.E. 147 Supreme Court of Georgia July 28, 1897
    Not cited

    Fish, J. 1. An equitable petition will lie at the instance of a judgment creditor of the true owner of land, to enjoin the sale thereof under an execution in favor of a non-resident corporation having no place of business in this State, against a third person

  12. 26 S.E. 769 Supreme Court of Georgia March 3, 1897
    Not cited

    Xumpkin, P. J. The motion for a new trial contains no ground involving any legal question of sufficient merit or importance to require special notice; the evidence warranted, the verdict; the trial judge was satisfied with the same; and the record does not disclose

  13. 32 S.E. 122 Supreme Court of Georgia December 15, 1898

    Lumpkin, P. J. A distress warrant was sued out by Johnson & Company against Coleman & Burch, who' filed a counter-affidavit. The case was tried on appeal before a jury in a justice’s court, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. There were disputed

  14. 28 S.E. 225 Supreme Court of Georgia March 8, 1897

    Little, J. 1. When in a justice’s court it does not appear from the summons that the plaintiff had split his cause of action so as to bring the same within the jurisdiction of that court, an objection to the jurisdiction upon that ground can not be made by motion

  15. Hale v. Hammond
    27 S.E. 671 Supreme Court of Georgia May 6, 1897
    Not cited

    Fish, J. This case involves no new legal question; the charges complained of were correct presentations of the law applicable to the issues involved; there was no error at the trial; the evidence, though in many respects conflicting, fully warranted the verdict

  16. Roush v. Eubanks
    27 S.E. 180 Supreme Court of Georgia March 29, 1897
    Not cited

    Cobb, J.. The charges complained of in the motion for a new trial were not, for any reason therein alleged, erroneous as against the losing party; the evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to set it aside. Judgment affirmed

  17. 30 S.E. 541 Supreme Court of Georgia March 5, 1898

    Little, J. On October 12, 1894, Rushing executed to Worsham & Co. a promissory note for $900, due November 11, 1895, together with a mortgage on certain real estate to secure the payment of the same. To a proceeding instituted by Worsham & Co., to foreclose this

  18. Carr v. Tate
    33 S.E. 47 Supreme Court of Georgia April 20, 1899

    Simmons, O. J. Mrs. Bowman died testate, making Tate her executor. Carr was indebted to the testatrix, and after her death gave to the administrator a note to cover this indebtedness, and a mortgage on his stock of goods to secure the note. This note was made

  19. 34 S.E. 217 Supreme Court of Georgia July 19, 1899
    Cited by 44 Dissent · Simmons

    Simmons, C. J., dissenting. The constitution of this State provides that no special law shall be enacted in any case for which provision has been made by an existing general law. There being a general law regulating the rate of interest to be •charged on loans

  20. 33 S.E. 660 Supreme Court of Georgia June 7, 1899

    Simmons, C. J. The record discloses that about twenty years-ago the County of Dougherty, through its proper officers, had a bridge erected over one of the streams in the county. The county authorities had the bridge built under contract, but-failed or neglected

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list