-
47 So. 28 Supreme Court of Louisiana June 22, 1908 No. 17,155Not cited
Statement of the Case. NICHOLLS, J. Defendant, indicted for the murder of James Caswell, on December 1, 1906, was by the jury found guilty of manslaughter, and was sentenced by the court to hard labor in the state penitentiary for a period of 10 years. He has
-
47 So. 119 Supreme Court of Louisiana June 8, 1908 No. 17,142Not cited
Statement of the Case. NICHOLLS, J. The actual applicant for the writs sought is Mrs. Josephine Schneider, the co-relator joining in the application solely to authorize and assist his wife. In her application she alleges that she is one of the heirs of the
-
56 So. 137 Supreme Court of Louisiana June 25, 1910 No. 18,211
On Rehearing. PER CURIAM. 1 It is ordered that the decree heretofore handed down in this cause be recast and made the final decree of the court, as follows, to wit: It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided, and reversed,
-
288 P. 570 Supreme Court of Kansas June 7, 1930 No. 28,843
The opinion of the court was delivered by Hutchison, J.: The appeal in this case is from an order of the trial court granting a new trial, where the court had previously sustained a motion of the defendant to take the case from the jury and render judgment
-
131 N.W. 379 Supreme Court of Minnesota May 19, 1911 No. 17,098— (144.)
Brown, J. This action for divorce was commenced in 1894, and resulted in. judgment on May 28, 1894, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the parties. Before the entry of the judgment the parties, through their counsel, stipulated to the terms of
-
189 N.W. 120 Supreme Court of Minnesota June 16, 1922 Nos. 22,788, 22,789Cited by 5 Dissent · Dibell
Dibell, J. (dissenting.) I dissent.
-
30 N.Y. St. Rep. 1012 New York Court of Appeals April 15, 1890Not cited
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. Affirming 19 N. Y. State Rep., 772.
-
30 N.Y. St. Rep. 1012 New York Court of Appeals April 15, 1890Not cited
Appeal dismissed, with costs. All concur. See 11 N. Y. State Rep., 87.
-
30 N.Y. St. Rep. 1013 New York Court of Appeals April 22, 1890Not cited
No papers. Motion for re-argument denied; ten dollars costs. See 28 N. Y. State Rep., 978.
-
9 D.C. 224 District of Columbia Court of Appeals April 15, 1875 No. 4175Not cited
By the Court : The right of Margaret Milbnrn to convey the real estate described in the deed to Amidon may be derived from that clause of the will which authorizes and empowers her to do with the estate what she may think best for her interest and the interest
-
30 N.Y. St. Rep. 1013 New York Court of Appeals April 22, 1890Not cited
No papers. Motion granted and tlie case put on the calendar for the first Tuesday of the next term. See 29 N. Y. State Rep., 781.
-
693 So. 2d 749 Supreme Court of Louisiana May 1, 1997 No. 96-K-2609Not cited
In re Rogers, Kenneth; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 2309-93; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA95 1485. Denied. TRAYLOR, J., not on panel.
-
412 So. 2d 254 Supreme Court of Alabama March 26, 1982 No. 80-518
412 So.2d 254 (1982) DRS. LANE, BRYANT, EUBANKS & DULANEY, a Partnership Composed of Martin L. Lane, Edward L. Bryant, Jr., R. Eubanks, Jr., and Frank M. Dulaney v. Margaret B. OTTS, as Administratrix of the Estate of William E. Otts, deceased. 80-518.
-
241 A.2d 380 Supreme Court of Connecticut May 7, 1968Not cited
The motion by the state to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County is granted.
-
241 A.2d 779 Supreme Court of Connecticut May 21, 1968Not cited
The motion by the defendant for a stay of execution of the judgment is denied.
-
248 A.2d 511 Supreme Court of Connecticut November 26, 1968Not cited
The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.
-
4 A. 410 Court of Appeals of Maryland May 28, 1886
Miller, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. A motion to dismiss has been made in this case upon the ground that the record was not transmitted to this Court within three months after the appeal was taken. The appeal was entered on the 11th of July, 1885,
-
254 A.2d 922 Supreme Court of Connecticut July 1, 1969Not cited
The motion by the defendant for a writ of mandamus and a disclosure of the progress of his appeal from the Superior Court in New London County is dismissed.
-
9 A. 125 Court of Appeals of Maryland May 28, 1886
Miller, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. George W. Bowers was indicted for violating the Act of 1864, ch. 184, a local law which prohibits the sale of *364 intoxicating liquors within three miles of either of the •churches in the village of Myersville
-
53 Md. 539 Court of Appeals of Maryland April 1, 1880Not cited
Brent, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. At the argument' of this case the Court declined to hear the counsel for the appellee, and intimated that the ruling appealed from would be affirmed. We think that the appeal lies in this case, as the motion to
Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.