TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law
14,509 cases · browse · 0.14 s
  1. E.D. Louisiana September 12, 2025 No. 2:25-cv-01561
    Not cited

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SANGISETTY LAW FIRM, LLC CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 25-1561 JASON JOY & ASSOCIATES, SECTION: “J”(5) PLLC, ET AL. ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion to Transfer/Dismiss (Rec. Doc.

  2. E.D. Louisiana September 22, 2025 No. 2:22-cv-03209
    Not cited

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TAMMY GREMILLION, on behalf of CIVIL ACTION the ESTATE OF JENNIFER L. GREMILLION, VERSUS NO: 22-3209 BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION SECTION: "A" (5) INC. and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY

  3. 76 F. Supp. 414 E.D. Louisiana March 16, 1948 No. 1925
    Not cited

    WATSON, District Judge. This is a petition of a veteran praying for reinstatement to his position, held prior to his entry into the armed service of the United States, and also for a judgment for monetary damages suffered hy reason of the Respondent’s refusal

  4. 97 F. Supp. 1002 E.D. Louisiana May 21, 1951 No. 2722

    WRIGHT, District Judge. Findings of Fact 1. The plaintiff in this action, Mrs. Lois H. Ward, is an employee of the defendant, The Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans, and the employer-employee relationship thereby created is governed

  5. E.D. Louisiana March 13, 2025 No. 2:25-cv-00313
    Not cited

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALLEN VICKS, #426156 CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 25-313 LOUISIANA STATE, ET AL. SECTION AL@ (5) ORDER AND REASONS Witphr oh isse above-captioned 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his

  6. Glazer v. Glazer
    274 F. Supp. 471 E.D. Louisiana October 12, 1967 No. 10567

    RUBIN, District Judge: Guilford Glazer sued his brothers, Jerome and Louis, to recover damages resulting from their breach of a contract with him when they removed him as an officer and director of various corporations in a complex controlled by the family. After

  7. E.D. Louisiana March 2, 2026 No. 2:25-cv-02097
    Not cited

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MELISSA ANNE ANDERSON CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 25-2097 ENTERGY CORPORATION ET AL. SECTION “H” ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court are Plaintiff Melissa Anne Anderson’s Motion for Default Judgment

  8. E.D. Louisiana February 3, 2026 No. 2:25-cv-00659
    Not cited

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAVAL NOLAN SULLIVAN CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 25-659 ORLEANS PARISH PRISON, ET AL. SECTION “M”(4) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct

  9. 43 F. Supp. 729 E.D. Louisiana March 16, 1942 No. 929

    CAILLOUET, District Judge. This action was instituted in the state court, in and for the Parish of Orleans, within this Eastern District of Louisiana, by citizens of Louisiana against the parents of a minor (likewise citizens of said State), with whom said minor

  10. 498 F. Supp. 126 E.D. Louisiana October 2, 1980 No. 80-927

    ROBERT F. COLLINS, District Judge. REASONS Plaintiff filed this action on March 14, 1980, seeking damages for injuries he allegedly sustained while working as a crew member of the M/V Sea Leader. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Louisiana Menhaden Company (

  11. 326 F. Supp. 2d 754 E.D. Louisiana May 11, 2004 No. Civ.A. 03-2119

    ORDER AND REASONS BARBIER, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Punitive Damages Claim (Rec.Doe. 42) construed broadly by this court as a Motion for Reconsideration. Upon consideration of the briefs and

  12. 159 F. Supp. 2d 303 E.D. Louisiana August 22, 2001 No. 98-3359

    ORDER AND REASONS DUVAL, District Judge. Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss filed by the following defendants: (1) Edwin W. Edwards and Andrew Martin (rec. doc. 97); (2) Edward J. DeBartolo, Jr. (rec.doc. 83); (3) Stephen Edwards (rec. doc. 89); (4) Robert

  13. 353 F. Supp. 2d 703 E.D. Louisiana June 21, 2004 No. CRIM.A.04-65

    ORDER AND REASONS LEMMON, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) Defendant Brad Stewart’s Motion to Suppress Confession (Document 9) is DENIED. 2) Stewart’s Motion to Reveal Confidential Informant (Document 10) is DENIED. 3) Stewart’s Motion to Suppress

  14. 517 F. Supp. 1319 E.D. Louisiana July 17, 1981 No. 79-3308

    MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK M. GORDON, District Judge. This breach of contract case is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The material facts which are not in dispute are as follows: Plaintiff, Louisiana Power & Light Company (hereinafter

  15. 653 F. Supp. 2d 649 E.D. Louisiana August 26, 2009 No. 06-3299
    Not cited

    *651 ORDER AND REASONS IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. Before the Court is Third Party Defendant Commerce and Industry Insurance Company’s (“C & I”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Rec. Doc. 228). The motion is opposed (Rec. Doc. 253). After review of

  16. 459 F. Supp. 2d 510 E.D. Louisiana October 27, 2006 No. 06-3817

    ORDER AND REASONS VANCE, District Judge. Before this Court is the plaintiffs motion to remand this action to state court for lack of diversity jurisdiction. For the following reasons, plaintiffs motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of serious

  17. Hines v. Louisiana
    102 F. Supp. 2d 690 E.D. Louisiana February 18, 2000 No. Civ. 97-2618

    ORDER AND REASONS MENTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the court on a writ of habeas corpus filed by state prisoner Jerome Hines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Upon review of the entire record, the Court has determined that no eviden-tiary hearing is

  18. 108 F. Supp. 2d 649 E.D. Louisiana May 24, 2000 No. 00-1122
    Not cited

    MINUTE ENTRY BARBIER, District Judge. Before the Court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and to Vacate Attachment and Impoundment. Plaintiff opposes the motion. The motion was set for hearing with oral argument on May 12, 2000, after which the Court ordered

  19. 435 F. Supp. 2d 524 E.D. Louisiana May 25, 2006 No. 05-4419

    ORDER BERRIGAN, District Judge. Before the Court is the United States’ Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Rec.Doc.88). The government contends that claimants have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies as required for this Court

  20. 239 F. Supp. 1004 E.D. Louisiana March 30, 1965 No. 739

    WEST, District Judge. Libelant, Walter M. Allen, was employed by Dravo Corporation in a capacity which he described as a “handy man,” but which actually appears to be that of a shipfitter. Dravo is a corporation engaged in the business of performing maintenance

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list