1. Amos v. State Copy cite
   237 S.W.2d 305 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas January 17, 1951 No. 25060
   Cited by 3

   237 S.W.2d 305 (1951) AMOS v. STATE. No. 25060. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. January 17, 1951. Rehearing Denied March 14, 1951. J. O. Duncan, F. L. Garrison, Gilmer, for appellant. R. L. Whitehead, Longview, George P. Blackburn, State's

2. Rivers v. State Copy cite
   155 S.W. 224 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas March 26, 1913 No. 2372.
   Not cited

   DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge. This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction for carrying on and about the person a pistol. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant asked the following instruction: “You are further instructed

3. McClure v. State Copy cite
   276 S.W. 1117 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas October 21, 1925 No. 9792.
   Not cited

   HAWKINS, Judge. Conviction is for the sale of intoxicating liquor with the punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. The record is before us without a statement of the facts proven upon the trial, and without bills of exception complaining

4. Ex parte Jackson Copy cite
   358 S.W.2d 628 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas June 27, 1962 No. 34,771
   Not cited

   MORRISON, Judge. This is an appeal from an order refusing appellant bail, after indictment for murder. At the hearing, the State called the mother of the deceased, who testified that she left her eleven months old child in the care of appellant and that when

5. Garrett v. State Copy cite
   366 S.W.2d 584 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas April 3, 1963 No. 35191
   Cited by 3

   McDonald, judge. The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for sale in a dry county ; the punishment, a fine of $150.00. The evidence reflects that Deputy Sheriffs B. F. Mayfield and Joe Mitchell and Liquor Control Officers James Toon and

6. Hunter v. State Copy cite
   300 S.W. 63 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas November 2, 1927 No. 11091.
   Cited by 1

   ON MOTION FOR REHEARING. HAWKINS, Judge. Appellant insists that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict, and on account of his contention we have again carefully examined the facts. No doubt arises in our minds as to its measuring up to the requirements

7. Woodward v. State Copy cite
   111 S.W. 941 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas June 24, 1908 No. 3774.
   Cited by 19

   *90 ON REHEARING. Decided June 24, 1908. BROOKS, Judge. This case was affirmed at a former sitting of this court and now comes before us on motion for rehearing. Appellant insists that the court erred in holding that the law of conspiracy was suggested

8. Thompson v. State Copy cite
   160 S.W. 685 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas November 12, 1913 No. 2730.
   Cited by 13

   HARPER, Judge. Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of selling intoxicating liquors in prohibition territory, and his punishment assessed at one year’s confinement in the State penitentiary. The first objection raised in the motion for a new trial is that

9. Taylor v. State Copy cite
   Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas November 26, 2008 No. AP-76,037
   Not cited

   IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,037 EX PARTE KEITH M. TAYLOR, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 05-00643 IN THE 194TH DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions

10. Ex parte Smith Copy cite
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas November 26, 2008 No. WR-70,980-01
    Not cited

    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-70,980-01 JAMES O. SMITH, Relator v. GALVESTON DISTRICT CLERK , Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 02CR0941-83 IN THE 212th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

11. Hawpe v. State Copy cite
    18 S.W.2d 1116 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas June 12, 1929 No. 12554
    Not cited

    MORROW, P. J. The offense is the unlawful possession of' a still for the purpose of. manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year. The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without

12. Lott v. State Copy cite
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas November 26, 2008 No. AP-76,045
    Not cited

    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,045 EX PARTE TERRY LEE LOTT, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 6809-A IN THE 33 RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM BURNET COUNTY             Per curiam. O P I

13. Ex parte Smith Copy cite
    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas March 11, 2020 No. WR-90,958-01
    Not cited

    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,958-01 EX PARTE JONAS SMITH, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-13-205993-A IN THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY Per curiam. ORDER Applicant was convicted

14. Porterfield v. State Copy cite
    182 S.W.2d 1023 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas October 18, 1944 No. 22987
    Not cited

    KRUEGER, Judge. The conviction is for burglary. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of ten years. Since perfecting his appeal, appellant has filed a written motion, duly verified, requesting the dismissal thereof. The

15. Woodland v. State Copy cite
    184 S.W.2d 281 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas December 20, 1944 No. 23009
    Not cited

    KRUEGER, Judge. The conviction is for the possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area. The punishment assessed is-confinement in the county jail for one year. All matters of procedure, including the complaint and information, appear to’ be regular

16. Singleton and Lee v. State Copy cite
    137 S.W.2d 23 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas February 28, 1940 No. 20873.
    Not cited

    GRAVES, Judge. This cause is practically identical with our No. 20872, (page 519 of this volume) the same appellants, the same class of felony, and the same facts, except one case is for the theft of two sheep, and one for the theft of three sheep from the same

17. Rape v. State Copy cite
    31 S.W. 652 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas June 19, 1895 No. 775.
    Cited by 4

    DAVIDSON, Judge. Conviction of assault and battery, the fine assessed being $5. Information charges the name of the assaulted party to be “Secundio Garzia.” It is contended the evidence shows it to be “Secundio Garcia.” The rule of idem sonans here applies,

18. Gonzales v. State Copy cite
    186 S.W.2d 242 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas March 21, 1945 No. 23087
    Not cited

    DAVIDSON, Judge. Appellants were convicted on a charge of aggravated assault .and their punishment assessed at sixty days’ confinement in jail. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The procedure appears to be regular and

19. Cotten v. State Copy cite
    406 S.W.2d 452 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas June 8, 1966 No. 39657
    Cited by 5

    OPINION WOODLEY, Judge. The offense is murder (Art. 802c Vernon’s Ann.P.C.) ; the punishment, 5 years. Appellant’s amended motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal was given on October 14, 1965. Reversal is sought upon three grounds. The first

20. Brian v. State Copy cite
    406 S.W.2d 912 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas May 18, 1966 No. 39648
    Cited by 1

    OPINION DICE, Commissioner. This is an appeal from the entry of a judgment nunc pro tunc. On July 27, 1962, appellant was convicted in the 128th Judicial District Court of Orange County, in Cause #6480, of the offense of burglary. Trial was before the court

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.