-
1 Md. 160 Court of Appeals of Maryland October 15, 1749 No. Lib. E. J. No. 11. fol. 560Not cited
THIS was an action of replevin for two negro boys named Lewis and Sampson, and two negro girls named Kate and Phcebe. Plea property. At the trial of this cause at the Assises, the Jury found by their special verdict, that Benjamin Parrott, of Talbot County, deceased
-
4 H. & McH. 487 Court of Appeals of Maryland May 15, 1748Not cited
MAY TERM, 1748. The Provincial Court gave judgment on the specie al verdict for the plaintiff.
-
1 Md. 158 Court of Appeals of Maryland May 15, 1748Not cited
EJECTMENT for a tract of land called Workington Park, in Saint Mary’s County. *159 At the trial of this cause at the Assises held in September, 1747, for Saint Mary’s County, it appeared from the warrant of resurvey in this cause, on which the defence was taken
-
1 Md. 157 Court of Appeals of Maryland September 15, 1744Not cited
IN this case the special bail surrendered the principal (in Prince George’s County) before one of the Justices of the Provincial Court, in discharge of himself as bail, and the principal was committed by the Justice to the custody of the sheriff of the County.
-
1 Md. 157 Court of Appeals of Maryland September 15, 1745 No. Lib. E. J. No. 9. fol. 473Not cited
EJECTMENT for a tract of land called Jasper Lott9 lying in §>iieen Anne’s County. At the trial of the cause, the Jury found by their special verdict, That Major John Hawkins was seised in fee of the land in question, and devised them to Michael Turbutt, and to
-
1 Md. 158 Court of Appeals of Maryland October 15, 1747Not cited
EJECTMENT for a tract of land called Trueman’s Hunting Quarter, lying in Saint Mary’s County. At the trial of this cause at Saint Mary’s Assises in September, 1747, the plaintiff, by Henry Darnall send Jeremiah Chase, his attornies, to prove the issue on his part
-
1 Md. 159 Court of Appeals of Maryland October 15, 1749
THIS vías an action of trespass for breaking the plaintiff’s close, and expelling and amoving him from the possession thereof. The defendant pleaded that he was put in possession of the land by a writ of habere facias posses sionem., executed in due form of law
-
1 Md. 153 Court of Appeals of Maryland April 15, 1744Not cited
Tins was an indebitatus assumpsit in the Provincial Court, referring to an account of particulars, some whereof can never alone support an indebitatus assumpsit The evidence to support the action below, being principally the oath of the plaintiff himself under