1. State v. Carondelet Canal & Navigation Co. Copy cite
   56 So. 137 Supreme Court of Louisiana June 25, 1910 No. 18,211
   Cited by 1

   On Rehearing. PER CURIAM. 1 It is ordered that the decree heretofore handed down in this cause be recast and made the final decree of the court, as follows, to wit: It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be annulled, avoided, and reversed,

2. Warren v. Warren Copy cite
   131 N.W. 379 Supreme Court of Minnesota May 19, 1911 No. 17,098— (144.)
   Cited by 5

   Brown, J. This action for divorce was commenced in 1894, and resulted in. judgment on May 28, 1894, dissolving the bonds of matrimony existing between the parties. Before the entry of the judgment the parties, through their counsel, stipulated to the terms of

3. Zackary v. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. Copy cite
   62 Fla. 419 Supreme Court of Florida June 15, 1911
   Cited by 8

   Whitfield, C. J. — This writ of error was taken under the statute to an order granting a new trial in an action at law. The only matter for determination is the alleged error in granting the new trial. A motion for new trial is addressed to the sound judicial

4. Brewer v. Yazoo & M. V. R. Copy cite
   54 So. 987 Supreme Court of Louisiana March 27, 1911 No. 18,431
   Cited by 19

   Statement of the Case. MONROE, J. Plaintiff prays to be decreed the owner (subject to a servitude, in favor of defendant, of a right of way, not to exceed 15 feet in width) of a certain portion of the square of ground, No. 150, in this, city, bounded by Hagan

5. Estate of Hartenbower Copy cite
   168 P. 560 California Supreme Court October 25, 1917 No. L. A. No. 5200.
   Cited by 7

   SHAW, J. This «is an appeal by the residuary legatees, or some of them, under the last will of the decedent from an order distributing a part of the estate 'to Cynthia J. Hartenbower, the widow of said decedent. *401 The fourth clause of the will is as follows

6. Benenato v. McDougall Copy cite
   137 P. 8 California Supreme Court November 25, 1913 No. S.F. No. 6168.
   Cited by 3

   MELVIN, J. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The defendants are architects who were employed by plaintiff to draw plans for the raising and alteration of a certain building of which plaintiff

7. Rivers v. State Copy cite
   155 S.W. 224 Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas March 26, 1913 No. 2372.
   Not cited

   DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge. This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction for carrying on and about the person a pistol. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant asked the following instruction: “You are further instructed

8. Swan v. Lincoln Terminal Co. Copy cite
   170 N.W. 497 Nebraska Supreme Court December 26, 1918 No. 20868
   Not cited

   Morrissey, C. J. Appeal from a judgment of the district' court for Lancaster county in favor of plaintiff, in an action brought under chapter 35 (sections 3551-3696), Rev. St. 1913, as amended hy section 127, ch. 85, Laws 1917, known as “Employers’ Liability

9. Spieler v. Lincoln Traction Co. Copy cite
   171 N.W. 896 Nebraska Supreme Court March 27, 1919 No. 20118
   Cited by 4 Dissent · Dean

   .Dean, J., dissenting separately. It seems that, even though the evidence does conflict, there is sufficient under the rule to sustain the verdict. A few points wifi be noted. Motorman Craig who'drove the car .testified on the part of defendant: “I set the

10. Price v. City of Lincoln Copy cite
    171 N.W. 921 Nebraska Supreme Court March 27, 1919 No. 20208
    Cited by 2

    Dean, J. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin the city of Lincoln from proceeding to collect a paving assessment levied upon certain city real estate owned by them. The suit, was dismissed, and plaintiffs appealed. . The record consists of the pleadings, the court’s

11. Keeler v. Estate of Hiles Copy cite
    172 N.W. 363 Nebraska Supreme Court April 19, 1919 No. 20327
    Not cited

    Sedgwick, J. After the death of James W. Hiles, this appellee presented a claim against his estate for $8,000 upon two checks, which are printed in appellants’ brief in the following form: ‘‘Gothenburg, Neb. Dee. 21, 1914.'Bank of Brady. One day after my death

12. McCandless v. Greusel Copy cite
    172 N.W. 249 Nebraska Supreme Court April 19, 1919 No. 20365
    Cited by 5

    Aldrich, J. In the district court for Lancaster county, plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants in the sum of $3,000 as alleged damages growing out of alleged false representations of the value of certain real estate. Prom this judgment and verdict

13. State ex rel. Thatcher v. District Court of the Sixth Judicial District Copy cite
    149 P. 178 Nevada Supreme Court April 15, 1915 No. 2175
    Cited by 3

    By the Court, McCarran, J.: This is an original proceeding in prohibition. Petitioner hereby seeks to obtain an order of this court prohibiting respondent, the Sixth judicial district court, from proceeding with the trial and determination of an action instituted

14. State v. Salgado Copy cite
    150 P. 764 Nevada Supreme Court July 15, 1915 No. 2129
    Cited by 14 Dissent · McCarran

    McCarran, J., dissenting: I dissent. The instruction, the giving of which is assigned as error, is as follows: "'Irresistible passion,’as used in these instructions, means something more than mere anger or irritation. It means that at the time of the act the

15. In re Bowman Copy cite
    151 P. 517 Nevada Supreme Court July 15, 1915 No. 2192
    Cited by 4

    By the Court, Norcross, C. J.: This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. It is alleged on behalf of petitioners that they are in the custody of the sheriff of Elko County upon a commitment issued by the justice of the peace of Elko township pursuant

16. Ward v. Pittsburg Silver Peak Gold Mining Co. Copy cite
    148 P. 345 Nevada Supreme Court October 15, 1915 No. 2120
    Cited by 11 Dissent · Norcross

    Norcross, C. J., dissenting: While the question is not altogether free from doubt, nevertheless, when a liberal construction is applied to the provisions of the statute governing appeals (Rev. Laws, 5358), the facts disclosed by the certificate of the trial

17. City of Reno v. Stoddard Copy cite
    167 P. 317 Nevada Supreme Court July 15, 1917 No. 2293
    Cited by 5 Dissent · McCarran

    McCarran, C. J., dissenting: I dissent. „ The question presented here is one which turns entirely upon a construction of statutes. Subdivision 3 of section 10 of article 12 of the charter of the city of Reno, as amended in 1915, in dealing with the powers and

18. Washoe County Bank v. Campbell Copy cite
    168 P. 643 Nevada Supreme Court October 15, 1917 No. 2020
    Cited by 5

    By the Court, McCarran, C. J.: The respondents were the lessees of Mrs. L. E. Alexander Shannon. The premises leased were known as the Alexander Ranch, situated in Washoe County. Some time after the making of the lease, the lessor made an assignment to the

19. Talbot v. Mack Copy cite
    169 P. 25 Nevada Supreme Court October 15, 1917 No. 2295
    Cited by 18

    On Petition for Rehearing Per Curiam: Rehearing denied.

20. De Remer v. Anderson Copy cite
    169 P. 737 Nevada Supreme Court January 15, 1918 No. 2227
    Cited by 11 Dissent · Coleman

    Coleman, J., dissenting: I dissent. The agreement entered into between the parties described in detail the entire tract of land leased' to appellant, and gave him an option or right to purchase “all or any part of the land herein leased which lies south of

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.