1. COMMONWEALTH v. S. RICARDO CHARLES Copy cite
   Massachusetts Superior Court September 12, 2025 No. 22-206
   Not cited

   SUPERIOR COURT COMMONWEALTH v s. RICARDO CHARLES Docket: 22-206 Dates: August 18, 2025 Present: Peter B. Krupp County: NORFOLK Keywords: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AND STATEMENTS FROM AUTOMOBILE STOP, EXIT ORDER

2. The COOK FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND, INC. v. FROZEN 4 LLC & Another. Copy cite
   Massachusetts Appeals Court March 28, 2025 No. 23-P-1479
   Not cited Unpublished

   NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to M.A.C. Rule 23.0, as appearing in 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1017 (2020) (formerly known as rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 [2009]), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore

3. Winthrop Corp. v. Lowenthal Copy cite
   558 N.E.2d 1138 Massachusetts Appeals Court August 28, 1990 Nos. 88-P-781 & 88-P-782
   Cited by 36

   Smith, J. Frank Lowenthal entered into a contract with Winthrop Corporation (Winthrop) whereby he agreed to write a computer program for that company. The contract called for arbitration of “any disagreement . . . with regard to any matter connected . . . [with

4. Commonwealth v. Alexander Dejesus Dominguez Ortiz. Copy cite
   Massachusetts Appeals Court April 8, 2025 No. 24-P-0067
   Not cited Unpublished

   NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to M.A.C. Rule 23.0, as appearing in 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1017 (2020) (formerly known as rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 [2009]), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore

5. GCP NEWTON GP, LLC, & Others v. COMMONWEALTH DEVELOPMENT LLC, Trustee Copy cite
   Massachusetts Appeals Court April 8, 2025 No. 24-P-469
   Not cited

   APPEALS COURT GCP NEWTON GP, LLC,[1] & others[2] vs. COMMONWEALTH DEVELOPMENT LLC, trustee[3] Docket: 24-P-469 Dates: March 11, 2025 – April 8, 2025 Present: Desmond, Ditkoff, & Englander, JJ. County: Middlesex Keywords: Practice, Civil

6. Porter v. Board of Appeal of Boston Copy cite
   Massachusetts Appeals Court January 18, 2024 No. AC 22-P-974
   Not cited

   NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial

7. Commonwealth v. Sibinich Copy cite
   598 N.E.2d 673 Massachusetts Appeals Court September 3, 1992 No. 91-P-1304
   Cited by 9

   Gillerman, J. In March of 1982, the defendant was found guilty of assault with intent to murder, armed robbery, assault and battery by means of a deadly weapon, and assault in a dwelling with the intent to commit a felony. An assault and battery conviction was

8. Commonwealth v. Cornish Copy cite
   547 N.E.2d 948 Massachusetts Appeals Court December 27, 1989 No. 89-P-533
   Cited by 8

   Perretta, J. After the jury returned verdicts of guilty on indictments charging the defendant with possession of marijuana and trafficking in cocaine, 1 the defendant brought a motion under Mass.R.Crim.P. 25(b)(2), 378 Mass. 896 (1979), renewing his requests

9. Alexander v. Berman Copy cite
   560 N.E.2d 1295 Massachusetts Appeals Court October 25, 1990 No. 89-P-714
   Cited by 13

   Ireland, J. This case involves a dispute between a seller and a broker over a commission on the sale of a business. Effective beginning in March, 1985, G. L. c. 259, § 7, requires that a business brokerage commission agreement be set out in writing, and signed

10. Whelihan v. Markowski Copy cite
    638 N.E.2d 927 Massachusetts Appeals Court August 25, 1994 No. 92-P-1679
    Cited by 15

    37 Mass. App. Ct. 209 (1994) 638 N.E.2d 927 TRACY WHELIHAN vs. EUGENE MARKOWSKI & another. [1] No. 92-P-1679. Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Hampden. December 6, 1993. August 25, 1994. Present: BROWN, PERRETTA, & JACOBS, JJ. Thomas M. Elcock

11. Cefalu v. Globe Newspaper Co. Copy cite
    391 N.E.2d 935 Massachusetts Appeals Court July 11, 1979
    Cited by 32

    Kass, J. In connection with stories which it published on April 23,1973, and on September 29,1974, The Boston Globe twice published a photograph of persons lined up to collect unemployment benefits at the Hurley Building. 1 That picture included the plaintiff

12. Commonwealth v. Shawn Pacheco. Copy cite
    Massachusetts Appeals Court April 29, 2025 No. 24-P-0665
    Not cited Unpublished

    NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to M.A.C. Rule 23.0, as appearing in 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1017 (2020) (formerly known as rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 [2009]), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore

13. Commonwealth v. Preston Copy cite
    413 N.E.2d 749 Massachusetts Appeals Court December 11, 1980
    Cited by 8

    Brown, J. The defendant’s appeal is before us on an allegation that the judge erred in finding a “solid default” based on the defendant’s conduct and in denying the defendant’s subsequently filed motion to revoke the sentence imposed. There was no error. The

14. Wood v. Roy Lapidus, Inc. Copy cite
    413 N.E.2d 345 Massachusetts Appeals Court December 8, 1980
    Cited by 37

    Kass, J. Some six months of confinement to a hospital bed following a skiing accident in the winter of 1967 inspired the defendant Roy Lapidus to invent a device which would prevent decubitus ulcers (bed sores). While still abed, Lapidus developed his “Lapidus

15. MAUREEN'S MIRTILLI, LLC v. IDLEWILD ACRES LLC & Another. Copy cite
    Massachusetts Appeals Court July 23, 2025 No. 24-P-0321
    Not cited Unpublished

    NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to M.A.C. Rule 23.0, as appearing in 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1017 (2020) (formerly known as rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 [2009]), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore

16. 25 Greycliff LLC v. Maryanne West. Copy cite
    Massachusetts Appeals Court July 21, 2025 No. 23-P-1106
    Not cited Unpublished

    NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to M.A.C. Rule 23.0, as appearing in 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1017 (2020) (formerly known as rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 [2009]), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore

17. Seery v. Franklin Paint Co. Copy cite
    6 Mass. L. Rptr. 551 Massachusetts Superior Court April 15, 1997 No. 932453
    Cited by 1

    Fabricant, J. Introduction In this toxic tort action, James Seery alleges that he was injured by exposure to vapors from paint solvent made by the defendant, Franklin Paint Company (Franklin). Seeiy alleges that Franklin’s solvent was contaminated with chemicals

18. Jewish Nursing Home Center, Inc. v. Massachussets Commission Against Discrimination Copy cite
    6 Mass. L. Rptr. 555 Massachusetts Superior Court February 19, 1997 No. 9501934B
    Not cited

    Fecteau, J. This matter comes before the court on defendant Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination's (“MCAD”) motion to dismiss. The plaintiff, The Jewish Nursing Home Center (the “Nursing Home”), brings the underlying preliminary injunction and declaratory

19. Roy v. Oinonen Copy cite
    6 Mass. L. Rptr. 558 Massachusetts Superior Court January 14, 1997 No. 9500080
    Not cited

    Sikora, J. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The parties have submitted, and the court has approved, a settlement of the present action. The plaintiffs Kelly Roy and her minor daughter Kassandra A. Norcross have agreed to settle their claims for personal injury

20. Irmina Myszkowska v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Copy cite
    Massachusetts Appeals Court December 1, 2025 No. 24-P-1324
    Not cited Unpublished

    NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to M.A.C. Rule 23.0, as appearing in 97 Mass. App. Ct. 1017 (2020) (formerly known as rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 [2009]), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore

Showing the top 500 cases. Narrow your search or add filters to see more.