-
384 U.S. 436 Supreme Court June 13, 1966 No. 759
In No. 759, Miranda v. Arizona, the police arrested the defendant and took him to a special interrogation room where they secured a confession. In No. 760, Vignera v.
Miranda v. Arizona. On March 13, 1963, petitioner, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested at his home and taken in custody to a Phoenix police station. He was there identified by the complaining witness.
One of the officers testified that he read this paragraph to Miranda. Apparently, however, he did not do so until after Miranda had confessed orally.
-
396 U.S. 868 Supreme Court October 13, 1969 No. 314
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
-
382 U.S. 925 Supreme Court November 22, 1965 No. 419
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. The case is transferred to the appellate docket.
-
823 P.2d 1278 Arizona Supreme Court January 21, 1992 Nos. SB-91-0045-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 88-0557, 89-1272 and 90-0090
On August 30, 1991, the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) filed a report recommending that Respondent Jesse Rodriguez Miranda be suspended from the practice of law for 3 months and thereafter be placed
We have jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to rule 53(e), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
rules enumerated in rules 42 and 51, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.
-
859 P.2d 1335 Arizona Supreme Court September 23, 1993 Nos. SB-93-0037-D; Comm. No. 92-0303Not cited
MIRANDA, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of seven months, effective as of January 1, 1993, for conduct in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer, as disclosed
MIRANDA shall pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $316.55. EXHIBIT A Before the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona Comm. No. 92-0303 In the Matter of JESSE R.
MIRANDA, a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, RESPONDENT. DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION REPORT [Filed May 12, 1993.]
-
41 F.3d 1513 Ninth Circuit November 9, 1994 No. 94-15055Not cited Unpublished
Floyd Miranda OWEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jeff HOOD, Grant Wood, Attorney General State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-15055. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 at 473-74 (1966). We distinguish, however, between a defendant's merely commenting on the interrogation and the necessary express indication of his desire to call a halt to the questioning.
to comply with Arizona statutes.