In No. 759, Miranda v. Arizona, the police arrested the defendant and took him to a special interrogation room where they secured a confession. In No. 760, Vignera v.

Miranda v. Arizona. On March 13, 1963, petitioner, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested at his home and taken in custody to a Phoenix police station. He was there identified by the complaining witness.

One of the officers testified that he read this paragraph to Miranda. Apparently, however, he did not do so until after Miranda had confessed orally.

Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Sup. Ct. Ariz. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. The case is transferred to the appellate docket.

On August 30, 1991, the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) filed a report recommending that Respondent Jesse Rodriguez Miranda be suspended from the practice of law for 3 months and thereafter be placed

We have jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to rule 53(e), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

rules enumerated in rules 42 and 51, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

MIRANDA, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of seven months, effective as of January 1, 1993, for conduct in violation of his duties and obligations as a lawyer, as disclosed

MIRANDA shall pay the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $316.55. EXHIBIT A Before the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona Comm. No. 92-0303 In the Matter of JESSE R.

MIRANDA, a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, RESPONDENT. DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION REPORT [Filed May 12, 1993.]