TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wyman v. United States

Wyman v. United States, 263 U.S. 14 (1923)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 22, 1923
Docket
No. 140
Judges
McKenna, McReynolds', Brandéis
Citations
263 U.S. 1444 S. Ct. 1068 L. Ed. 1361923 U.S. LEXIS 2710

Opinion — McKenna

Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error was proceeded against by an information for the violation of a section of the National Prohibition Act.

A motion was made to dismiss the information on the ground that the crime charged was an infamous one within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment to the'Constitution of the United States, in that by reason of the statutes of the United States and those of New. York and New Jersey, the court had. power to impose an infamous punishment, namely imprisonment at hard labor and *15 imprisonment at involuntary labor, and that, therefore,. Wyman could not be held to answer for such crime except upon presentment or indictment by a grand jury.

The motion was. denied and after trial plaintiff in error was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 45 days in the Essex County jail, Newark, New Jersey.

To review this conviction and sentence is the pffrpose of this writ of error..

It will be observed that the case is identical in its legal aspects with Brede v. Powers, just decided, ante, 4. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the proceedings, action and judgment are Affirmed.

Me. Justice McReynolds' and Me. Justice Brandéis . concur in the result.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 12026: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Rossini v. United States6 F.2d 350 (8th Cir. 1925)
  2. Michael T. Bonome v. The Bonome Living TrustNo. 3:25-cv-06117 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 27, 2026)

Most recent

  1. Michael T. Bonome v. The Bonome Living TrustNo. 3:25-cv-06117 (W.D. Wash. Jan. 27, 2026)
  2. Rossini v. United States6 F.2d 350 (8th Cir. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list