Hinton v. Sifford
Charles E. HINTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amy M. SIFFORD; Richard W. Jacobsen, Jr.; Patrick M. Martin; Ramona Masterton, Defendants-Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Charles E. Hinton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
See Hinton v. Sifford, No. CA-00-541-1-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.