United States v. Bishop
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen E. BISHOP, F/D/B/A Ray’s Leisure Time Shop, Defendant-Appellant, and Mary Ann Bishop; West Virginia Bureau of Employment Programs; West Virginia Department of Tax and Revenue, Defendants
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Stephen E. Bishop appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for a hearing and granting the government’s motion to set aside a satisfaction of judgment that was allegedly entered by mistake. Bishop contends that the district court should have held a hearing and allowed him to present evidence as to the scope of the agreement. He also contends that the court erred in determining that the agreement settled some, rather than all, of the government’s claims against him. Having previously granted Bishop’s uncontested motion to submit on briefs, we have reviewed the briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Bishop, No. CA-96-2057-5 (S.D.W.Va. July 9,1999 & Mar. 3, 2000).
AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.