Rich v. Dotson
James D. RICH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Stephen DOTSON, Respondent-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
James D. Rich seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
See Rich v. Dotson, No. CA-00-658 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2001). We deny Rich’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion to compel. We also deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.